Blackpill Women are NOT attracted to men with best genes

[HueHueBr]

Even babies know how to differentiate good genes from bad genes:

Scientific Blackpill

The Scientific Blackpill is about understanding the nature of human social and sexual behavior with a particular focus on evolutionary psychological perspectives...

incels.wiki

Saying that preferences are shaped by culture shows that you are a bluetard.

 

[HappilySingle]

Even babies know how to differentiate good genes from bad genes:

Scientific Blackpill

The Scientific Blackpill is about understanding the nature of human social and sexual behavior with a particular focus on evolutionary psychological perspectives...

incels.wiki

Saying that preferences are shaped by culture shows that you are a bluetard.

But are babies racist?

 

[HueHueBr]

But are babies racist?

Babies are clear proof that beauty is objective and independent of the culture or eyes of the beholder. Ugly will be ugly wherever it goes.

If you think beauty is subjective, you are bluetard.

 

[rubber-duckie]

We don't live in the savanna. We live in cities and suburbs where everyone travels on paved roads and have their gazes glued to screens. Good-looking people are the ones best suited to the current environment.

but think about the number 6-feet in terms of height? why is "6-feet tall" such a desirable trait especially when filtering on online dating? if measurement systems never existed, we could reasonably conclude the #6 would not be such a status marker as it is today.


which suggest to me, that culture is part of attraction, and not just strictly biology

 

[Smallus Dickus]

I have perfect palatal development, yet women don't register me as sexually attractive.

Like I said SOME parents fucked development of their children. It seems that no matter what, you were fucked from the beginning. It doesn't mean that you have bad genes. It means you are not sexually attractive, natural selection is not the same as sexual selection. Let's say some natural disaster happens, and city/province/country is cut out from the world, and people becomes fucking apes - who has bigger chances of survival, someone with NW0 or completely bald? There's no difference! And who has bigger chance manlet or tallfag? Probably manlet since he needs less resources to survive. Does it mean that being short is advantage? No. Well it was in this situation but in different one(where he has to fight with tallfag for example) would be not an advantage. I will repeat that's why diversity is important, now we have 7 bilion humans that's quite a number, but when it comes to single population it needs different genes because even if population is "perfect" for enviromnent it's living now, conditions can change. Then population needs flexibility to survive. Not to mention that in modern society you needs men to have something to protect, because without it they don't invest in work(why should they, if men can live on bare minimum), but I'm talking from purely biological standpoint. Just because something is attractive to opposite sex doesn't mean everything else is not needed. Of course when it comes to quality of life genes can have huge impact of it.

 

[Rassimov]

but think about the number 6-feet in terms of height? why is "6-feet tall" such a desirable trait especially when filtering on online dating? if measurement systems never existed, we could reasonably conclude the #6 would not be such a status marker as it is today.


which suggest to me, that culture is part of attraction, and not just strictly biology

This. When american twitter thots roast men who's height starts with 5': the number 6 becomes the marker of acceptability, naturally as it's simply rounded and neat; in Europe that starts with 180cm; which is exactly 5ft 10.87 inches when converted, JFL if you don't believe in the power of social consturcts at this point.

Like I said SOME parents fucked development of their children. It seems that no matter what, you were fucked from the beginning. It doesn't mean that you have bad genes. It means you are not sexually attractive, natural selection is not the same as sexual selection. Let's say some natural disaster happens, and city/province/country is cut out from the world, and people becomes fucking apes - who has bigger chances of survival, someone with NW0 or completely bald? There's no difference! And who has bigger chance manlet or tallfag? Probably manlet since he needs less resources to survive. Does it mean that being short is advantage? No. Well it was in this situation but in different one(where he has to fight with tallfag for example) would be not an advantage. I will repeat that's why diversity is important, now we have 7 bilion humans that's quite a number, but when it comes to single population it needs different genes because even if population is "perfect" for enviromnent it's living now, conditions can change. Then population needs flexibility to survive. Not to mention that in modern society you needs men to have something to protect, because without it they don't invest in work(why should they, if men can live on bare minimum), but I'm talking from purely biological standpoint. Just because something is attractive to opposite sex doesn't mean everything else is not needed. Of course when it comes to quality of life genes can have huge impact of it.

You're either missing or proving my original thesis; if women's "sexual selection" preferences then stem from a variety of external influences other than pure biological determinism; then they are indeed culturally and socially influenced which can also be explained why noodles in america still prefer white Chadlites over Changs or any other ethicity for that matter.

 

[SUPERCEL]

Agreed with the part "women are easily influenced by their peers and media"

But I think they would pick a generic white Chad over that chinese model.

 

[Ropemaxx]

Both probably

 

[TheReaper]

What would make a perfectly healthy Curry manlet signal less reproductive health than a light eyed Nordcuck lanklet?

height

 

[wide_eyed_optimism_]

Mt Everest IQ

 

[M12Comic]

Actually girls prefer white males because they are socially superior and seen like so

If China or India were the rulers of the world instead of caucasians, girl would preferer indians or chinese males

 

[Deleted member 6214]

Actually girls prefer white males because they are socially superior and seen like so

If China or India were the rulers of the world instead of caucasians, girl would preferer indians or chinese males