Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Women are NOT attracted to men with best genes

R

Rassimov

Banned
-
Joined
Jul 29, 2018
Posts
1,490
Congratulations, this massive cope incels dogmatically spread is now being co-opted by "blackpilled" women who justify their insane preferences on supposedly "natural" biological grounds. Unless we are talking about severe deformities or diseases; What would make a perfectly healthy Curry manlet signal less reproductive health than a light eyed Nordcuck lanklet? Hollywood. Female mating preferences are not narrowly fixated in hard-wired biology, but to a great extent culturally influenced and can be socially engineered. Keep in mind that women are so easily influenced by external factors they will literally dump a guy just because her friends' circle told her that he is ugly.

For those who insist with your reductionist theory; If it really boils down to pure raw genetic quality which brings her to lust after one type only, then I invite you to ask yourself who would have slayed on a college campus more?; this chiseled low-bf model with a jawline that cuts diamonds and the cheekbones of the Gods:
Chang


or generic Chadlite next door?
Chandler
 
Both probably
 
What's up with your jb cousin? I want update ngl
 
js guy in 1st pic is an ugly mofo, the guy from friends mog him hard
 
Heh I think it's a combination of both really.
 
> asian

> good genes
 
Actually girls prefer white males because they are socially superior and seen like so

If China or India were the rulers of the world instead of caucasians, girl would preferer indians or chinese males
 
mostly correct

in our modern world, a mating preference does not even need to be related to some type of genetic advantage.

A blue-eyed, symmetrically beautiful faced stud, with a full head of hair, is useless in the savanna. He serves no practical use, he is just pretty.

So, women might be attracted to facial harmony or a prominent jawbone or a deep voice or blue eyes in a partner.

But these traits do not necessarily give men any relevant genetic advantage of survival, in fact, they can often be detrimental.
 
JFL at OP not even understanding what good genes are. Being white is also a good gene.
 
Congratulations, this massive cope incels dogmatically spread is now being co-opted by "blackpilled" women who justify their insane preferences on supposedly "natural" biological grounds. Unless we are talking about severe deformities or diseases; What would make a perfectly healthy Curry manlet signal less reproductive health than a light eyed Nordcuck lanklet? Hollywood. Female mating preferences are not narrowly fixated in hard-wired biology, but to a great extent culturally influenced and can be socially engineered. Keep in mind that women are so easily influenced by external factors they will literally dump a guy just because her friends' circle told her that he is ugly.

For those who insist with your reductionist theory; If it really boils down to pure raw genetic quality which brings her to lust after one type only, then I invite you to ask yourself who would have slayed on a college campus more?; this chiseled low-bf model with a jawline that cuts diamonds and the cheekbones of the Gods:
View attachment 172668

or generic Chadlite next door?
View attachment 172670

The ricecel looks creepy and weird. Too sharp. The white guy will slay more.
 
There is no such things as best genes. It depends on environment. In one environment tall people can have advantage, in other environment(maybe lacking in food for example) shorter people have advantage. Of course there are few shitty genes, resulting in genetic diseases, but there are extremely rare like hemophilia. Even most disease that people thinks are 'genetic' are in reality dependent on more that one gene, also genes are more like blueprints, even more important is gene expression(epigenetic), ie: in different environment the same gene can be expressed differently and have different results. One thing is blueprint, the other is engineer who builds based on it. It's easy to understand, even if you have Chad genes you can look like shit if you have not enough nutrition in your childhood(not as tall as you should be, shitty teeth, shitty bones etc)
More important is genetic diversity, that's why I laugh on some sci-fi of fantasy books/movies where 100 or so people create new colony. Without genetic diversity one setback could easily wipeout whole population
 
For those who insist with your reductionist theory; If it really boils down to pure raw genetic quality which brings her to lust after one type only, then I invite you to ask yourself who would have slayed on a college campus more?; this chiseled low-bf model with a jawline that cuts diamonds and the cheekbones of the Gods:
View attachment 172668

or generic Chadlite next door?
View attachment 172670
what? the white guy obviously has better genes lol, no jawline for ur flat mongoloid face
 
js guy in 1st pic is an ugly mofo, the guy from friends mog him hard
what? the white guy obviously has better genes lol, no jawline for ur flat mongoloid face

By what metric? The asian has chielsed features, wide face, low hairline, thicker eyebrows, sharper cheekbones, chielsed jawline. Objectively he mogs Chandler.
 
By what metric? The asian has chielsed features, wide face, low hairline, thicker eyebrows, sharp cheekbones, sharper jawline.
his monolid eyes just ruins it for me (noracis), plus his expression is annoying
that eye can ruin even the most perfect bone structure
overall second guy is better looking imo
There is no such things as best genes. It depends on environment. In one environment tall people can have advantage, in other environment(maybe lacking in food for example) shorter people have advantage. Of course there are few shitty genes, resulting in genetic diseases, but there are extremely rare like hemophilia. Even most disease that people thinks are 'genetic' are in reality dependent on more that one gene, also genes are more like blueprints, even more important is gene expression(epigenetic), ie: in different environment the same gene can be expressed differently and have different results. One thing is blueprint, the other is engineer who builds based on it. It's easy to understand, even if you have Chad genes you can look like shit if you have not enough nutrition in your childhood(not as tall as you should be, shitty teeth, shitty bones etc)
More important is genetic diversity, that's why I laugh on some sci-fi of fantasy books/movies where 100 or so people create new colony. Without genetic diversity one setback could easily wipeout whole population
in a world where survival is no longer an issue, and good looking people are treated better and have more opportunities in every aspect, while being ugly gets you shit on, a good genetic is obviously the one that grants good face and frame and maybe charisma and low inhibness (not sure if these traits are genetic)

id rather have chad looks even if I was born with an ilness where id be sickly all the time and die before 30
rather than be a healthy normie / incel that lives 80 years, thats how important good looks is
 
Last edited:
By what metric? The asian has chielsed features, wide face, low hairline, thicker eyebrows, sharper cheekbones, chielsed jawline. Objectively he mogs Chandler.
white guys upper third and nose mogs him
 
his monolid eyes just ruins it for me (noracis), plus his expression is annoying
that eye can ruin even the most perfect bone structure
overall second guy is better looking imo

From a eugenicist pov, from which the blackpill tries to reason hypergamy, the white guys eye area cannot be explained as evolutionary more advanced than the asians one. You're proving my point; our tastes are culturally influenced. Just have generic movie looks theory.
 
Also receding jaws are developed most of the time due to poor posture.
 
What? White dude wins cause white = better genes than asian. Its quite obvious.
 
useless in the savanna
We don't live in the savanna. We live in cities and suburbs where everyone travels on paved roads and have their gazes glued to screens. Good-looking people are the ones best suited to the current environment.
 
> asian

> good genes
99.9% of foids will take a low-tier normie white boy over the highest tier giga-Chang. So I’m definitely the trashiest of trash genes.
 
Actually girls prefer white males because they are socially superior and seen like so

If China or India were the rulers of the world instead of caucasians, girl would preferer indians or chinese males
China is essentially the secondary ruler of the world behind the US. I love China and will have a place there one day.
 
There is no such things as best genes. It depends on environment. In one environment tall people can have advantage, in other environment(maybe lacking in food for example) shorter people have advantage. Of course there are few shitty genes, resulting in genetic diseases, but there are extremely rare like hemophilia. Even most disease that people thinks are 'genetic' are in reality dependent on more that one gene, also genes are more like blueprints, even more important is gene expression(epigenetic), ie: in different environment the same gene can be expressed differently and have different results. One thing is blueprint, the other is engineer who builds based on it. It's easy to understand, even if you have Chad genes you can look like shit if you have not enough nutrition in your childhood(not as tall as you should be, shitty teeth, shitty bones etc)
More important is genetic diversity, that's why I laugh on some sci-fi of fantasy books/movies where 100 or so people create new colony. Without genetic diversity one setback could easily wipeout whole population
If what you mean by environment is only mouth breathing then I can agree with you. Otherwise it's a cope.
 
The white guy is not a chadlite.... Hes a normie. I dont even see how hes a high tier one.
 
Girls are attracted to beauty. If you appear to be handsome it doesn't matter to them if you have a heart disease for instance, they'll fuck you anyways
 
We don't live in the savanna. We live in cities and suburbs where everyone travels on paved roads and have their gazes glued to screens. Good-looking people are the ones best suited to the current environment.

Not true. It takes a while for female sexual selection to "catch up" to modern civilization. Most of their instincts were built up during the 10s of 1000s of years humans spent as hunter gatherers. Being tall serves little purpose in the modern world, for example. It would have served a great purpose in the savannah (being able to see a greater distance could have meant the difference between life and death).
 
Not true. It takes a while for female sexual selection to "catch up" to modern civilization. Most of their instincts were built up during the 10s of 1000s of years humans spent as hunter gatherers. Being tall serves little purpose in the modern world, for example. It would have served a great purpose in the savannah (being able to see a greater distance could have meant the difference between life and death).
Being tall gives you a halo effect that is very useful in the modern world.
 
Actually girls prefer white males because they are socially superior and seen like so

If China or India were the rulers of the world instead of caucasians, girl would preferer indians or chinese males
Giga cope.
 
Being tall gives you a halo effect that is very useful in the modern world.

Thats a shallow statement. The halo effect exists because women find tall men attractive. And women find tall men attractive because of the instincts built up over a long period of time when being taller (regardless of absolute height btw) had a survival advantage.
 
Thats a shallow statement. The halo effect exists because women find tall men attractive. And women find tall men attractive because of the instincts built up over a long period of time when being taller (regardless of absolute height btw) had a survival advantage.

Exactly. God the retard ure arguing with .. some incels are just so damn fucking stupid FOR FUCK SAKE, READ SOM BASIC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY FOLKS
 
If what you mean by environment is only mouth breathing then I can agree with you. Otherwise it's a cope.

Cope cope cope srope. I'm just talking about biology, if you have potential to be tall but have no food(and of course best if it's quality food, with nutritious values) in your childhood you will not be as tall as you can be. Is this cope? It's a fucking atomic blackpill. Next time you will tell it's cope that after Friday there's Saturday, it's just fucking biological facts, I thought that blackpill is rejecting all lies, and just focus on pure facts. And facts are that some people(some of them even here on this forum) were neglected by parents, and their quality of life is worse that it could be. Mouthbreathing is just one thing, proper nutrition is another, another one is proper care for teeth(as bad teeth affect your whole body), proper socialisation is another one, and there's tons more.
If parents don't care about their children, giving him shit food and not care about his health he can end up as incel even if he had potential to be taller, look better and have better health both physical and mental. Fact is that just part of equation are genes per se, their expression is just as important, if not even more. You can call it cope, and don't agree with research


11cm taller on average in just one generation

“This is usually thought to be due to better food and health care in the new country,” said Prof Bogin.
“But also, because the emotional stress that limited growth in the old country has been lifted – and there is emotional stimulus for bigger body size in the new country.”

I'm pretty sure that most people on this forum had shit parents. Of course some people were always beyond any redemptions, some people for example would be always turbomanlets no matter what, but imagine now, you are 11 cm taller(unless you are tall already). That would be massive improvement of life quality, for some maybe it would be enough to leave incel territory at least not be laugh at in work, school etc. Not to mention if parents cared about teeth, there would be no such thing as under/overbite, same with bones and better frame. Sometimes just few milimeters of bone is all what it change you from incel to normie, that's not a cope that's a fucking nuclear blackpill - some of people here could be normies or even chadlites, if parents really cared about them.
 
We don't live in the savanna. We live in cities and suburbs where everyone travels on paved roads and have their gazes glued to screens. Good-looking people are the ones best suited to the current environment.
this. common sense.
 
Thats a shallow statement. The halo effect exists because women find tall men attractive. And women find tall men attractive because of the instincts built up over a long period of time when being taller (regardless of absolute height btw) had a survival advantage.
It doesn't matter where the halo effect came from, just that it's here and makes being tall an evolutionary advantage right now, in the present.
 
Yes they are, just wait a few months, I'm sure Jeremy Meeks will get a Novel Prize, a Fields medal or something. He has such great genes he must have a stellar IQ.
 
It doesn't matter where the halo effect came from, just that it's here and makes being tall an evolutionary advantage right now, in the present.

Youve got it upside down. Female sexual selection is programmed by evolution, not the other way around.
 
Youve got it upside down. Female sexual selection is programmed by evolution, not the other way around.
Being tall gave a physical advantage in the past, resulting in a halo effect that gave it yet another advantage that has outlasted its progenitor. How is that so hard to understand?
 
Congratulations, this massive cope incels dogmatically spread is now being co-opted by "blackpilled" women who justify their insane preferences on supposedly "natural" biological grounds. Unless we are talking about severe deformities or diseases; What would make a perfectly healthy Curry manlet signal less reproductive health than a light eyed Nordcuck lanklet? Hollywood. Female mating preferences are not narrowly fixated in hard-wired biology, but to a great extent culturally influenced and can be socially engineered. Keep in mind that women are so easily influenced by external factors they will literally dump a guy just because her friends' circle told her that he is ugly.

For those who insist with your reductionist theory; If it really boils down to pure raw genetic quality which brings her to lust after one type only, then I invite you to ask yourself who would have slayed on a college campus more?; this chiseled low-bf model with a jawline that cuts diamonds and the cheekbones of the Gods:
View attachment 172668

or generic Chadlite next door?
View attachment 172670

You can think of different races as different species. In a natural world with homogeneous countries, top would slay in Asia and bottom wouldn't do so well in a white country (unless tallfag). It does boil down to genetics once you factor in racial diversity and the interracial preferences that have fucked everything up.
 
mostly correct

in our modern world, a mating preference does not even need to be related to some type of genetic advantage.

A blue-eyed, symmetrically beautiful faced stud, with a full head of hair, is useless in the savanna. He serves no practical use, he is just pretty.

So, women might be attracted to facial harmony or a prominent jawbone or a deep voice or blue eyes in a partner.

But these traits do not necessarily give men any relevant genetic advantage of survival, in fact, they can often be detrimental.

I've always said appeal to nature is a double edged sword.
 
Girls are attracted to beauty. If you appear to be handsome it doesn't matter to them if you have a heart disease for instance, they'll fuck you anyways
 
High IQ. Women are not doing any kind of eugenics, only the genes responsible for your looks matter. If you look good and tall, you can have a shitty heart that will kill you at 22 like Zyzz and women will still flock to you. It's not about health and best genes, it's about looks.

Not to mention how most foids only reproduce old and with betabuxxes nowadays, there are no benefits to women sexual liberation whatsoever, not even that.
 
OP is on cope over drive mode lately with his posts.
 
I've said it before numerous times. Women need to be replaced by something better. They can no longer have the responsibility of genetic selection and child birth anymore. They have shown they are unable to wield it properly.
Being tall gives you a halo effect that is very useful in the modern world.
Halo effect because of the aforementioned female preference.
 

Similar threads

WhiteAryan
Replies
62
Views
2K
GermanManlet
GermanManlet
WeirdPanda
Replies
42
Views
552
mylifebelike5'7
M
Nordicel94
Replies
14
Views
1K
Alinyaung
Alinyaung
PersonaPimp
Replies
9
Views
930
Genetics_subhuman
Genetics_subhuman

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top