Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

TeeHee Women are largely responsible for the spread of bad genes

Stupid Clown

Stupid Clown

Bianca Devins got what she deserved
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 29, 2022
Posts
31,987
I've heard a lot of talk from pseudo science spreading simps about how women being picky is creating better genetics. They always forget to mention the fact that women themselves can carry inferior genetics. Hence why we get videos like this, although it's definitely an extreme case




The majority of modern women are actively pushing dysgenics. How? Well, it's simple. Most American women are overweight and obese

A mother’s obesity in pregnancy can affect her child’s development years down the road, according to researchers who found lagging motor skills in preschoolers and lower IQ in middle childhood for boys whose mothers were severely overweight while pregnant. A team of epidemiologists, nutritionists, and environmental health researchers at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health and the University of Texas at Austin and found that the differences are comparable to the impact of lead exposure in early childhood. The findings are published in BMC Pediatrics(link is external and opens in a new window).
Seeing as how the majority of women are overweight and a good percentage obese, it's easy to assume that in combination with women gaining weight while being pregnant, the IQ of their male offspring is being significantly affected in a negative fashion

There's another means which women are pushing dysgenics too. That is having children when they're older. Past 30 women's eggs start going bad which means certain genetic errors are more likely. This is one of the most common causes of autism. I myself have a rare condition known as klinefelter's because my mom had me when she was 40.

And finally, let's not forget it's ugly women who are far more likely to have a partner than ugly men. Thus far more likely to spread their nasty genes


Researchers analyzed the results of 11,056 interviews in Spain to assess which factors most predicted a person's ability to find a partner for marriage.

Their study found in numerous parameters and analyses that male attractiveness had a massive effect on a man's ability to find a partner, to find a partner with a university degree, or to find a partner with a higher educational level.

However, in all areas of study, no major effects were seen for women based on their attractiveness. Female physical attractiveness generally played little or no role, however being unattractive presented a slight penalty to the likelihood of forming a couple among women of working-class origin, with the researchers noting this effect was much weaker among women of this social class then the one found among corresponding males of this class.


Women having sons be like

1000006851
 
Eugenics for thee but not for me :feelskek:
As long sub5 holes keep breeding, incels will continue to exist.
 
Researchers analyzed the results of 11,056 interviews in Spain to assess which factors most predicted a person's ability to find a partner for marriage.

Their study found in numerous parameters and analyses that male attractiveness had a massive effect on a man's ability to find a partner, to find a partner with a university degree, or to find a partner with a higher educational level.

However, in all areas of study, no major effects were seen for women based on their attractiveness. Female physical attractiveness generally played little or no role, however being unattractive presented a slight penalty to the likelihood of forming a couple among women of working-class origin, with the researchers noting this effect was much weaker among women of this social class then the one found among corresponding males of this class

Spanish foids with their hypergamy again, why doesnt it surprise me? Worst part is they think they are settling all the time :lul:
 
It's like when short women say they pick tall men because they don't want short kids, then they should get an egg donation from a tall woman because they still risk having short kids due to their own genes. It's so odd that they don't consider how their own genes will affect their kids
 
Eugenics for thee but not for me :feelskek:
As long sub5 holes keep breeding, incels will continue to exist.
:yes: :yes: :yes:

It's like when short women say they pick tall men because they don't want short kids, then they should get an egg donation from a tall woman because they still risk having short kids due to their own genes. It's so odd that they don't consider how their own genes will affect their kids
They're completely ignorant. They live in a fantasy world where women are angels who are incapable of anything negative. Doesn't help that anyone who points out the obvious is censored
 
Eugenics for thee but not for me :feelskek:
As long sub5 holes keep breeding, incels will continue to exist.
They’ll exist even if sub 5 women stopped breeding because of how diverse Human genes are, Chads can end up with kids that are ugly and short if they have a ancestor with bad traits or if they get the worst possible combination from the mother and father.
 
It doesnt even make sense cause women and men have different look standards, most men want a feminime looking wife who is quite short with good feminime features. The problem with that is when they have a son and the son looks 1:1 like his mom with maybe just his dads hair colour (this is about me) and he gets all the bad features from his mom and you created a sub5.
 
It doesnt even make sense cause women and men have different look standards, most men want a feminime looking wife who is quite short with good feminime features. The problem with that is when they have a son and the son looks 1:1 like his mom with maybe just his dads hair colour (this is about me) and he gets all the bad features from his mom and you created a sub5.
Ngl sometimes this can be fixed by having multiple kids, you’d probably get at least one Chad son if you had 5 kids.
 
Bluepillers must forget or be blind to the fact that foids are hypergamous. Probably the latter. So, the bottom tier foids or 'femcels' are usually hitting way above their bracket. It's just that fakeup really inflates both their egos and looks.
 
Then you still have 4 non chads and most likely a sub 5 or 2
Idk I’ve seen a lot of families where chads and stacy have kids and the kids end up being either ugly or average instead of chad/stacy tier.

I think it’s generally because Women and Men have different traits that make them attractive, Women short and petite, if you give a Man a short build they’re incel tier tho.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top