No the fuck they aren’t, and you’re literally foid-worshipping and giving their slutdom credit when you make brainmelted fucking comments like this.
Sexual selection ≠ natural selection. Especially in our unnatural as fuck environment. It’s rooted in natural selection, sure, but that doesn’t make them one and the same.
To start, women select for a number of traits in men that correlate with lower intelligence and lower impulse control:
Where is the “eugenics” in this??
Additional examples of this selection for defective/maladjusted men can be seen in women’s widespread hybristophilia (shows in their porn/erotica preferences as well), dark triad traits positively correlating with reproductive success in men, and the prevalence of women in lower-income communities going for thugmaxxers.
We can also talk about the lesbianpill. The evidence is too much to list, so I’ll just provide some basic examples you may already know of:
• Foids are insanely homoerotic (you see this with “straight” women rubbing up on each other in public even if no attractive man is watching, etc.)
• The most popular genre of porn with women is dykeshit (they consume a fuckton of lesbian erotica as well)
• Multiple studies on arousal show that women react more strongly when presented with female than male stimuli
Before you say “lesbian/bisexual = Chadsexual” – yes, I’m aware, we all are. That doesn’t change the fact that being a dyke is not “eugenic.” Preferring to mate with other women over the vast majority of men is literally creating a reproductive bottleneck. This is not “natural selection” in any sense of the word, and not how any species survives.
The last point is foids’ fetishization of animals. This is perhaps the most standout point here.
• Women read erotica about getting fucked by animals – this is literally normie knowledge at this point, to the extent that there are mass memes about it, so I don’t think I need to source this
• Multiple studies on female arousal have found that women are more aroused by videos of BONOBOS having sex than of men fucking women (source)
• The prevalence of woman-fucked-by-dog porn online speaks for itself (“muhh but it’s porn” – it’s real women getting fucked by real dogs)
• A 2011 Italian study on the pornography viewing habits of young adults documented that 16.5% of female pornography consumers reported that they had recently watched pornography involving sex with animals; this corresponded to roughly 10% of the female sample in total, who reported "currently" watching bestiality pornography (source)
Long story short, there’s a less complex, more fun to say, and far more accurate word to describe women than “eugenicists.” Women are whores. It’s really that simple
Sexual selection ≠ natural selection. Especially in our unnatural as fuck environment. It’s rooted in natural selection, sure, but that doesn’t make them one and the same.
To start, women select for a number of traits in men that correlate with lower intelligence and lower impulse control:
Where is the “eugenics” in this??
Additional examples of this selection for defective/maladjusted men can be seen in women’s widespread hybristophilia (shows in their porn/erotica preferences as well), dark triad traits positively correlating with reproductive success in men, and the prevalence of women in lower-income communities going for thugmaxxers.
We can also talk about the lesbianpill. The evidence is too much to list, so I’ll just provide some basic examples you may already know of:
• Foids are insanely homoerotic (you see this with “straight” women rubbing up on each other in public even if no attractive man is watching, etc.)
• The most popular genre of porn with women is dykeshit (they consume a fuckton of lesbian erotica as well)
• Multiple studies on arousal show that women react more strongly when presented with female than male stimuli
Before you say “lesbian/bisexual = Chadsexual” – yes, I’m aware, we all are. That doesn’t change the fact that being a dyke is not “eugenic.” Preferring to mate with other women over the vast majority of men is literally creating a reproductive bottleneck. This is not “natural selection” in any sense of the word, and not how any species survives.
The last point is foids’ fetishization of animals. This is perhaps the most standout point here.
• Women read erotica about getting fucked by animals – this is literally normie knowledge at this point, to the extent that there are mass memes about it, so I don’t think I need to source this
• Multiple studies on female arousal have found that women are more aroused by videos of BONOBOS having sex than of men fucking women (source)
• The prevalence of woman-fucked-by-dog porn online speaks for itself (“muhh but it’s porn” – it’s real women getting fucked by real dogs)
• A 2011 Italian study on the pornography viewing habits of young adults documented that 16.5% of female pornography consumers reported that they had recently watched pornography involving sex with animals; this corresponded to roughly 10% of the female sample in total, who reported "currently" watching bestiality pornography (source)
Long story short, there’s a less complex, more fun to say, and far more accurate word to describe women than “eugenicists.” Women are whores. It’s really that simple
Last edited:
