Red Shambhala
Death to America
★★
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2017
- Posts
- 2,566
One of the most out-of-touch redpills is the idea that women are stupid, and lack both agency as well as the mental capacities to follow such agency.
Male bravado and male hubris have resulted in men greatly underestimating women and greatly overestimating their own intelligence. As a result, many incels cannot even finish college or find a job or maybe not even high-school, while women effortlessly pass college, find a job, workout, eat healthy, care about their weight, find sex, Chads, then a husband and use the system for their advantage. The smart ones are even smart enough to realize that women must have each other's back if they want to succeed. Still, some NEET incels whose attention span and whose perseverance aren't even developed enough to finish reading their precious Bible, complete any long-term project/hobby, get their fat ass up and do something other than to blame the Jews for their diabetes, believe to be geniuses who know how the world works and can easily outsmart all these foids.
Men are so full of themselves, so full of toxic masculinity, that they cannot even imagine that women have agency and use the system for their advantage. At "best"(?), men imagine that other men - Jewish men, rich men, liberal men, beta men - are behind it all. In their hubris and their folly, they do not even see how women are playing them.
One of the ACTUAL blackpills incels refuse to swallow is that women are cunning, smart and must not be underestimated. And that many men, incels and normies alike, are actually pretty stupid. Women have agency. For example, wanting to compete for a minority of dominant high-status Chad while basically demonizing - if not even outright criminalizing - the sexual desires of low-status men is a form of agency. And women are pretty good at slowly but steadily achieving this outcome where low-status men do not even dare to look at them anymore. (A few incels beating their chest online while dropping out of society aren't an actual threat but just used to further their agenda.)
Women can profit both from left-wing as well as from right-wing feminists. Right-wing feminists do not believe that women have agency, and if you don't have agency, you're not held responsible for your bad actions. The real punishment then falls on the "actual" perpetrators which are, yawns, always men, of course: Jewish men, conservative men, patriarchal men, beta men ... but definitely men! Being underestimated can also be very useful because people don't see how much of a threat you are. German chancellor Angela Merkel, for instance, was long underestimated before she destroyed one male politician in her party (and then in other parties) after another until she became chancellor for 15 years.
Edit:
Further reading: Hanna Rosin - The End of Men: And the Rise of Women
Male bravado and male hubris have resulted in men greatly underestimating women and greatly overestimating their own intelligence. As a result, many incels cannot even finish college or find a job or maybe not even high-school, while women effortlessly pass college, find a job, workout, eat healthy, care about their weight, find sex, Chads, then a husband and use the system for their advantage. The smart ones are even smart enough to realize that women must have each other's back if they want to succeed. Still, some NEET incels whose attention span and whose perseverance aren't even developed enough to finish reading their precious Bible, complete any long-term project/hobby, get their fat ass up and do something other than to blame the Jews for their diabetes, believe to be geniuses who know how the world works and can easily outsmart all these foids.
Men are so full of themselves, so full of toxic masculinity, that they cannot even imagine that women have agency and use the system for their advantage. At "best"(?), men imagine that other men - Jewish men, rich men, liberal men, beta men - are behind it all. In their hubris and their folly, they do not even see how women are playing them.
One of the ACTUAL blackpills incels refuse to swallow is that women are cunning, smart and must not be underestimated. And that many men, incels and normies alike, are actually pretty stupid. Women have agency. For example, wanting to compete for a minority of dominant high-status Chad while basically demonizing - if not even outright criminalizing - the sexual desires of low-status men is a form of agency. And women are pretty good at slowly but steadily achieving this outcome where low-status men do not even dare to look at them anymore. (A few incels beating their chest online while dropping out of society aren't an actual threat but just used to further their agenda.)
Women can profit both from left-wing as well as from right-wing feminists. Right-wing feminists do not believe that women have agency, and if you don't have agency, you're not held responsible for your bad actions. The real punishment then falls on the "actual" perpetrators which are, yawns, always men, of course: Jewish men, conservative men, patriarchal men, beta men ... but definitely men! Being underestimated can also be very useful because people don't see how much of a threat you are. German chancellor Angela Merkel, for instance, was long underestimated before she destroyed one male politician in her party (and then in other parties) after another until she became chancellor for 15 years.
Edit:
Further reading: Hanna Rosin - The End of Men: And the Rise of Women
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_End_of_MenIn the text, she theorizes that women have won the gender war, having "pulled decisively ahead [of men] by almost every measure." Rosin uses the shift in the American economy as one of her main sources. Here, jobs which traditionally held male-led jobs are now lost in the face of the recession and recovery of said economy. Rosin also cites rising college graduation rates, steady employment, and an increased presence in male-dominated fields such as politics and business.
Rosin's analysis of the shift in gender roles within American society lead to questioning the validity of this shift. She states that women find themselves confident and capable in their new roles. She also claims that their presence may be a key to shifting the culture of the workplace as their presence there becomes more established and widespread.