Theory Women are autosexuals

[Lonly ghost]

Women are autosexuals and that's why they are lesbians.

Women are sexually attracted to themselves first. Other women remind them of themselves, that's why women are attracted to other women.

When women watch heterosexual porn or read erotica , they are not attracted to the man at all , they are attracted to the woman because they see themselves as the woman and the center of attention.

When women watch porn or read erotica , they like to imagine themselves as the woman . They focus on the woman , not on the man.

Women get aroused while looking at a woman or imagining the woman , they do not focus on the man.

This is why women are mostly " sexually attracted" to fictional men , because they are not attracted to most men in real life .

Conclusion, women are attracted to themselves. Women are lesbians because other women remind them of themselves.

Women are "attracted" to fictional men and chads because they are not most men.

 

[Ibrahim997]

Sexy as cars

 

[Nithingr]

Not even sewer worthy, it's basically true. They are attracted to chads because it validates them. Think Patrick Bateman looking in the mirror while having sex. Every foid is like that. Chad is a tool, an accessory. She doesn't truly value him, only for what he provides her, even if that is only his validation.

 

[Hoodpreet]

Sexy as cars

Honestly he probably does have higher SMV than me

 

[Hoodpreet]

Not even sewer worthy, it's basically true. They are attracted to chads because it validates them. Think Patrick Bateman looking in the mirror while having sex. Every foid is like that. Chad is a tool, an accessory. She doesn't truly value him, only for what he provides her, even if that is only his validation.

I think this is exaggerated tbf. The truth to lesbianpill is that women find most women more attractive than they do most men, but I don’t think it’s a matter of their sexuality being completely meta-based and them not even being physically attracted to Chads.

The Notorious SLAV has made quite a few threads on the topic of female-on-male rape and how surprisingly common it is. There’s no “validation” in rape, as it’s a forced/coerced activity, so I find it highly unlikely women would be doing this if they had no true attraction to the top % of men

 

[Caichan]

Honestly he probably does have higher SMV than me

JB cars showed their headlights to him

 

[Hoodpreet]

JB cars showed their headlights to him

Brutality. @NIGGER BOJANGLES would be so jealous

 

[Lonly ghost]

I think this is exaggerated tbf. The truth to lesbianpill is that women find most women more attractive than they do most men, but I don’t think it’s a matter of their sexuality being completely meta-based and them not even being physically attracted to Chads.

The Notorious SLAV has made quite a few threads on the topic of female-on-male rape and how surprisingly common it is. There’s no “validation” in rape, as it’s a forced/coerced activity, so I find it highly unlikely women would be doing this if they had no true attraction to the top % of men

Women rape with the intention to harm and humiliate their victims ,not because of attraction.

When women rape small kids . They are not doing this for sexual pleasure.

They are doing this to dominate and harm someone, both physically and mentally.

Dickpill says that women prefer bigger size for sexual pleasure.

Then , why do women rape kids ? Because they want to harm them , not because of attraction or for sexual pleasure. But literally to harm and humiliate them.

 

[Hoodpreet]

Women rape with the intention to harm their victims ,not because of attraction.

When women rape small kids . They are not doing this for sexual pleasure.

They are doing this to dominate and harm someone, both physically and mentally.

Dickpill says that women prefer bigger size for sexual pleasure.

Then , why do women rape kids ? Because they want to harm them , not because of attraction or for sexual pleasure. But literally to harm them.

I’m pretty sure most victims of female-on-male sexual crimes are not kids. Also, a lot of CSA cases involving female perpetrators are some teenage Chad fucking his teacher, so those don’t count. I’m specifically talking abt when they force themselves.

And heterosexual sex isn’t even a penetrative act for the man, it’s penetrative for the woman, so the idea that foids would force kids to stick their cocks in their pussies as a sadism thing seems a bit far-fetched.

In general this whole exaggerated version of the lesbianpill reads like a psyop to me. The WomenAreNotIntoMen subsoyddit posts it a lot, and I don’t find it surprising at all that said subcuckit is also troon central

 

[Hoodpreet]

Dickpill says that women prefer bigger size for sexual pleasure.

Dickpill denial is next level copium I’m ngl

 

[Lonly ghost]

I’m pretty sure most victims of female-on-male sexual crimes are not kids. Also, a lot of CSA cases involving female perpetrators are some teenage Chad fucking his teacher, so those don’t count. I’m specifically talking abt when they force themselves.

And heterosexual sex isn’t even a penetrative act for the man, it’s penetrative for the woman, so the idea that foids would force kids to stick their cocks in their pussies as a sadism thing seems a bit far-fetched.

In general this whole exaggerated version of the lesbianpill reads like a psyop to me. The WomenAreNotIntoMen subsoyddit posts it a lot, and I don’t find it surprising at all that said subcuckit is also troon central

Using an object to penetrate someone is also considered rape .

Women can use an object or a stick to penetrate a victim . This should definitely be counted as rape.

 

[Hoodpreet]

Using an object to penetrate someone is also considered rape .

Women can use an object or a stick to penetrate a victim . This should definitely counted as rape.

It is counted but I’m pretty sure it’s a minority of cases

 

[Nithingr]

The Notorious SLAV has made quite a few threads on the topic of female-on-male rape and how surprisingly common it is. There’s no “validation” in rape, as it’s a forced/coerced activity, so I find it highly unlikely women would be doing this if they had no true attraction to the top % of men

I'll check that out.

 

[Hoodpreet]

I'll check that out.

Here’s two:

Except for one single detail, this rape study is a gold standard of what such studies should be like

Said detail being that it doesn't break down how common the various tactics are in each perpetrator/victim gender combinations. It shows that well over half of the victimized men report female perpetrators with them, taking missing data into account, being about thrice as common for male victims...

incels.is

"Approximately 17% of heterosexual women have sexually coerced a man sometime during their lifetime."

An Examination of Sexual Coercion Perpetrated by Women This study surveys studies which measured female perpetration. The authors found 32 such studies, predominantly, but not entirely, heterosexual, with a cumulative sample of 22,632 women and calculated weighted means with the results of...

incels.is

 

[Nithingr]

I think this is exaggerated tbf

This thread used to be in sewers (or I misread the subforum) either way I was having fun with my answer, hence why I said:

Not even sewer worthy

So oops

Here’s two:

Thanks

 

[The Notorious SLAV]

The Notorious SLAV has made quite a few threads on the topic of female-on-male rape and how surprisingly common it is. There’s no “validation” in rape, as it’s a forced/coerced activity, so I find it highly unlikely women would be doing this if they had no true attraction to the top % of men

Truth.

Women rape with the intention to harm and humiliate their victims ,not because of attraction.

When women rape small kids . They are not doing this for sexual pleasure.

They are doing this to dominate and harm someone, both physically and mentally.

Dickpill says that women prefer bigger size for sexual pleasure.

Then , why do women rape kids ? Because they want to harm them , not because of attraction or for sexual pleasure. But literally to harm and humiliate them.

Nah, not really. When asked, both men and women pretty consistently choose sexual arousal as their most common reason for sexually pressuring or forcing someone.

Pretty recently I found this study mentioning it:

The most frequently endorsed reason for perpetrating sexual violence was “feeling really horny,” although feeling “good” or being drunk/high were also common reasons noted by aggressors. Afterward, many said they felt guilty or ashamed and were worried about the other person’s feelings. Fear of getting caught was universally absent.

"Findings suggest that 60% of sexual assault, 40% of attempted rape, 42% of rape, and 67% of coercive sex were perpetrated against a romantic partner"

Lots of broken personality detectors going around I see:feelsjuice:. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370816567_Event_Characteristics_of_Sexual_Violence_Perpetration_Against_Romantic_Partners_Versus_Non-Romantic_Partners I got reminded of this when reading a @Misogynist Vegeta thread...

incels.is

And there's also this one, showing that young women are much more likely to choose both sexual arousal and power as reasons for it than older women, though the former obviously still dominates:

For all respondents combined, the most chosen motive category was sexual arousal (95%), followed by relationship (49%), and then by power (18%) with 50% choosing two or more motive categories. Providing conceptual support for the Millennial shift, significantly more Millennial women than Gen X women chose motives of sexual arousal and power as reasons for perpetrating sexual aggression. An important finding for the relationship motive is that substantial numbers of both men and women engaged in sexual aggression because they felt that having sex would make the person like them.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224499.2024.2321319

Here’s two:

Thanks

Also this one got put in Must-Read and is from at least some of the co-authors of that intergenerational study I linked above:

The most brutal rape study just dropped, Chads pretty much have mind control powers and women are the ones using physical force to rape

Title:feelsjuice:. Remember the two studies on rape tactics I've talked about a few times here, which show that the most common sexual coercion/rape tactics are seduction and emotional manipulation, and that it is those tactics that men are much more likely to use than women, while both genders...

incels.is

 

[ANTAGONIST]

I’m pretty sure most victims of female-on-male sexual crimes are not kids. Also, a lot of CSA cases involving female perpetrators are some teenage Chad fucking his teacher, so those don’t count. I’m specifically talking abt when they force themselves.

And heterosexual sex isn’t even a penetrative act for the man, it’s penetrative for the woman, so the idea that foids would force kids to stick their cocks in their pussies as a sadism thing seems a bit far-fetched.

In general this whole exaggerated version of the lesbianpill reads like a psyop to me. The WomenAreNotIntoMen subsoyddit posts it a lot, and I don’t find it surprising at all that said subcuckit is also troon central

He just says things even when they don't make sense to push a narrative. He seems to hail from the same cult as @Morro

 

[Nithingr]

Only replied cos I thought this was in Sewers

 

[Lonly ghost]

I thought this was in Sewers I'm getting cooked over something I don't even believe

Are posts like this supposed to be in sewers ?

I will keep that in mind the next time I post something like this.

 

[Nithingr]

Are posts like this supposed to be in sewers ?

I will keep that in mind the next time I post something like this.

No, they belong here or ID. It's a very speculative theory, given how most blackpill science largely relies on empirical data. You still put in more effort than the average lounge post.

But as Hoodpreet and WorthlessSlav have done, people are going to contend with your opinion, especially with evidence-based arguments. If you believe in your theory, that will help you develop it and seek out evidence for your claims.

If you posted this in the sewers, you would not get thoughtful critiques like they have given. However, upon those same lines, I was responding thoughtlessly because I mistook here for Sewers, and consequently am not able to defend what I said, though I'm expected to.