Regardless of your philosophy/religion, let’s look at a scenario from a naturalist/atheistic perspective, since a lot of fellow BPers hold that view.
Inb4 someone DNRs and says life is worth living in this naturalist scenario: regardless of how enjoyable life is for the genetically gifted men (and all women), there will be suffering. However, if you die or never existed, not only is there no suffering, but not even desire for anything. Life for Chad is like drinking water, but death is like never having been thirsty at all. For us? Life is like suffering thirst in a desert with no hope for water.
Back to my main point: when someone dies, their suffering ends, since they just stop existing. So, instead of wishing for your enemies to die and escape suffering, don’t you want the people who’ve wronged you to spend the rest of their lives paying off student loans and credit cards, and being stuck in traffic? If anything, a rational person would want themselves to die, not their enemies. In that case, you’d never suffer again while they would have to continue to exist in this shithole of a world, albeit with less suffering than we’ve had to endure. So, wishing someone you hate to die doesn’t make sense; it’s like wishing someone who’s wronged you to get an all-expenses-paid vacation and win the lottery.
This is also why terrorism and going postal, regardless of whether there is a “cause” or ideology, will always be cringemaxxed. Not only will nothing change (in fact, terrorism always turns people off to your ideas), but you will have sacrificed whatever small freedom you had just to rot in jail until you die. At least before, you could have had enjoyable copes or roped. Now, here you are with no quality-of-life while the foids, Chads, normies, or whoever hurt you get to enjoy nonexistence, even if they didn’t have the strength/imtelligence to rope, themselves.
Inb4 someone DNRs and says life is worth living in this naturalist scenario: regardless of how enjoyable life is for the genetically gifted men (and all women), there will be suffering. However, if you die or never existed, not only is there no suffering, but not even desire for anything. Life for Chad is like drinking water, but death is like never having been thirsty at all. For us? Life is like suffering thirst in a desert with no hope for water.
Back to my main point: when someone dies, their suffering ends, since they just stop existing. So, instead of wishing for your enemies to die and escape suffering, don’t you want the people who’ve wronged you to spend the rest of their lives paying off student loans and credit cards, and being stuck in traffic? If anything, a rational person would want themselves to die, not their enemies. In that case, you’d never suffer again while they would have to continue to exist in this shithole of a world, albeit with less suffering than we’ve had to endure. So, wishing someone you hate to die doesn’t make sense; it’s like wishing someone who’s wronged you to get an all-expenses-paid vacation and win the lottery.
This is also why terrorism and going postal, regardless of whether there is a “cause” or ideology, will always be cringemaxxed. Not only will nothing change (in fact, terrorism always turns people off to your ideas), but you will have sacrificed whatever small freedom you had just to rot in jail until you die. At least before, you could have had enjoyable copes or roped. Now, here you are with no quality-of-life while the foids, Chads, normies, or whoever hurt you get to enjoy nonexistence, even if they didn’t have the strength/imtelligence to rope, themselves.
