Now that there are so few wars, famines, and diseases to cull the weaker members of the population, the rationale seems to be in place for the ruling classes to either actively or passively eliminate those men who contribute nothing to the production of genetically superior offspring.
Actively eliminating incels (and perhaps even low-tier normies) could be done under the guise of combatting terrorism. I mean, at this point most of the population seems to think we're all radicalized extremist nutcases who deserve to be rounded up in re-education/concentration camps and taught a harsh lesson or two about "muh wonderful wamen". From there it's only a small distance to advocating wholesale extermination of, say, sub-five men.
Passively eliminating us is even easier to justify, in a way. It merely means allowing the status quo and current developments to continue getting worse and worse for average or below-average males. Implementing strict laissez-faire on the sexual marketplace as it exists today will certainly give rise to a "Chad takes all" hellscape, thereby causing many desperate men to rope. And if the suicide rates among the undesirables aren't high enough after that, that's easy to fix too. Just make employment harder to get and maintain for ugly men (HR departments are full of useful idiots willing to do the dirty work); make popular and viable copes either illegal or impossibly expensive; systematically undermine and destroy communities where outcast men band together.
I'm not saying any of this will happen on a grand society-wide scale. But as I said earlier, the rationale is already in place, the means are obvious to anyone with more than three functional braincells, and the incentives are on the rise. Let's just say, then, that I wouldn't be comfortable betting against something like this happening in the near future.
Actively eliminating incels (and perhaps even low-tier normies) could be done under the guise of combatting terrorism. I mean, at this point most of the population seems to think we're all radicalized extremist nutcases who deserve to be rounded up in re-education/concentration camps and taught a harsh lesson or two about "muh wonderful wamen". From there it's only a small distance to advocating wholesale extermination of, say, sub-five men.
Passively eliminating us is even easier to justify, in a way. It merely means allowing the status quo and current developments to continue getting worse and worse for average or below-average males. Implementing strict laissez-faire on the sexual marketplace as it exists today will certainly give rise to a "Chad takes all" hellscape, thereby causing many desperate men to rope. And if the suicide rates among the undesirables aren't high enough after that, that's easy to fix too. Just make employment harder to get and maintain for ugly men (HR departments are full of useful idiots willing to do the dirty work); make popular and viable copes either illegal or impossibly expensive; systematically undermine and destroy communities where outcast men band together.
I'm not saying any of this will happen on a grand society-wide scale. But as I said earlier, the rationale is already in place, the means are obvious to anyone with more than three functional braincells, and the incentives are on the rise. Let's just say, then, that I wouldn't be comfortable betting against something like this happening in the near future.
Last edited:
