Theory Why you shouldn't support socialism as an incel

[Izayacel]

I support Capitalism in theory "Work hard and you will succeed", i agree that everyone being equal is impossible.

But in reality all that matters in capitalism is to be born rich.

 

[ElTruecel]

Holy shit you're right for once. Except capitalism came first and liberalism to defend capitalism came second.

No they both come from the enlightenment I think you’re specifically talking about neoliberalism

 

[mlcurrycel]

Socialists hate incels.

I'm a sexual socialist. A virgin wife for every man, guaranteed. Do you call that hating incels?

 

[TouhouMathcel]

Ethically? Yes. We are the social lumpenproletariat. Normies are the social proletariat. Incels are like the homeless, but for relationships and sex.

I mean that incels (social lumpenproletariat) and normies (actual proletariat) are kinda enemies, so socialists must choose the side anyway, right?

 

[NihilisticSoul]

Ouch, that's actually a tough and legitimate question unlike the ones that SFcels give me. I think apartments should be spacious for the sanity of foids. There needs to be an inner ring and outer ring to prevent access to outer doors and windows. Sounds cruel but we must end hypergamy by any means necessary.

I mean like urban design, do you prefer older buildings or skyscrapers?

I like this type of futuristic cities

 

[mlcurrycel]

Agreed. "Socialism" is just another name for fraud.

You think it's okay for Chad to have all the sex because was born lucky?

 

[mlcurrycel]

I mean that incels (social lumpenproletariat) and normies (actual proletariat) are kinda enemies, so socialists must choose the side anyway, right?

Nigga what? Marxists believe lumpenproletariat is easier for the capitalists to brainwash as well as recruit into gangs, police, and army if socialistshavr too much power. But Marxists don't actually hate lumpenproletariat, they want the best for them too. Like a retarded little brother.

 

[mlcurrycel]

I mean like urban design, do you prefer older buildings or skyscrapers?

I like this type of futuristic cities

Shit looks cool, I want my descendants to be awed.

 

[TouhouMathcel]

Nigga what? Marxists believe lumpenproletariat is easier for the capitalists to brainwash as well as recruit into gangs, police, and army if socialistshavr too much power. But Marxists don't actually hate lumpenproletariat, they want the best for them too. Like a retarded little brother.

Being retarded little brother sounds not so fun

 

[mlcurrycel]

I agree in principle. The free market allows one to get ahead with more than just looks, since looks are only one element of a myriad of things that are valued by society. Thereby unattractive men can offer their hard work and intelligence to make up for what they lack in looks, and if they go far enough they can even win over women this way. And indeed, this system worked in the old days, with many examples of truecels getting rich from sheer brilliance, and countless subhuman men who attained sex and marriage through exchange of money.

However, because it's subject to human nature, capitalism is still largely favorable to normalfags. Since good looks and being NT allows people to gain favor and build bigger networks which is essential to making a lot of money. This is less the case in a truly free market like in the Wild West, but in an environment like the current one where billionaires and corporations lobby the government to do their bidding, and there is simultaneously heavy regulation and resource concentration, networking and popularity becomes much more crucial than providing value to the market. But arguably the paradigm since the 1930s has shifted away from capitalism and towards a techno-industrialist corporatocracy.


Leftism is just a vague idea of equality that can be interpreted in many ways. One can believe in equality for their own group but inequality for others. Hence there is no such thing as a truly socialist or capitalist economy anyway, most take elements from both.

Blaming corporatocracy instead of capitalism is like calling the USSR not real socialism. It's not persuasive, is it?

Capitalism inherently centralises arounda few winners, and those winners centralise the government intheir favour. Look at Rockerfeller and Carnegie.

 

[mlcurrycel]

Being retarded little brother sounds not so fun

Everyone is equal when Marxists win. Under Androcentric Marxism Rodgerism, every man no matter how ugly will have a virgin wife and lookism will be banned, short men will get HGH and ugly truecels will get corrective surgery. As we get more developed, genetic engineering will abolish ugliness forever.

 

[mlcurrycel]

True this guy talks a lot about it:



It does but the problem is that it's in the best interest of the industrial capitalists for women to work and for families and communities to be fragmented. Just consider how much profit is gained from a divorce. First the couple pays for a divorce lawyer, counseling, filing through the government, then the two separate couples must pay for their own house/apartment, car, utilities, groceries, etc. Then they both must work and pay for a babysitter and later the school system takes over the babysitting by collecting property taxes, and then the divorced couple pays dating apps/matchmaking service to find a new partner, and contraception for hookups, and so on. There's just too much money to be made for (((capitalists))) not to support it.

This is why a degree of socialism, but a kind that aims for national integrity rather than social equality, is necessary to prevent the proliferation of women's rights and other cancers of modernity. Think of for example, nationalization of a bank by a right-wing government, to insure the bank acts in the national interest. Once that sort of system is in place, capitalism can function well within it.

You are right about divorce.

 

[mlcurrycel]

Yeah pretty much. Government itself is a form of socialism, but the government reflects the values of the people, and our values are fucked.

Government is the military arm of the economic elite, not socialism. Socialism is government by the poor for the purpose of abolishing poverty.

Incels are genetically poor.

 

[mlcurrycel]

Yea one that was ran by Jews & Anglos. We kick those 2 groups out, separate by race, bring back the family unit, slow down the exponential growth of technology, the problem gets solved. Well it’s more complicated but these are the basics

There's no difference between you and me.

 

[mlcurrycel]

The Jooos definitely have something to do with that but I think the main reason is that both Jewish and non-Jewish capitalists share the same interests.

The Jooos want a weak, diverse, and unstable society because usually when a community feels strong and homogeneous they seek to get rid of those they perceive as foreigners (i.e. the Jooos). Also if society is weak the strong bonds that the Jooos can historically form between each other in their small community are worth twice as much, because you're a strong group in a weak world.

The capitalists want all of those same things simply because when a community can't get together it's easier to exploit it. Plus it's highly unlikely that a diverse and heterogeneous community can act as one because people generally don't trust what they perceive as "diverse", it's human nature. That's why companies are obsessed with all this diversity bullshit. They don't give a fuck about blacks, fags, trannies etc. They just don't want people to realize they might have a common interest in join forces against the ruling class.

Leaked internal documents from an Amazon-owned company revealed that the company uses a "diversity index" in which the threat of unionization is "higher" at stores with "lower diversity".

Hindus were united and we never hurt the Jews. That's a hole in your argument

 

[AnilBashir]

It doesn't matter what you support as an incel because your oppinion is literally worthless.

High IQ post

 

[mlcurrycel]

Those at the top benefit off capitalism but aren't capitalism. They're the kike.

Retard

 

[mlcurrycel]

Capitalism is just evolving to what the Jews are pushing. The Jews also want communism if possible. As long as it gives them power.

What power do the apex capitalists not already have?

 

[mlcurrycel]

Most rich people in the world already come from wealthy families tho.
They didn't do anything to deserve this, except being lucky enough to be born in the right family.

They're WealthChads and I hate them

 

[mlcurrycel]

Which is exactly why socialism shouldn't exist. If it does then normies lose nothing in the genetic lottery.

Retarded. Politics by spite - how are you better than BLM? We must abolish Lookism.

 

[mlcurrycel]

Look at Venezuela. Socialism always leads to a small amount of people in power enjoying the luxuries of wealth etc... And anyone who's not in the government being poor and starving. It's about power. These people are sick. They can't just be content being rich, they have to have more and above all else they wish to inflict pain upon others.

Nigga ... Venezuela is a capitalist country with a welfare state, not Cuba or North Korea

 

[deleted fren]

Retarded. Politics by spite - how are you better than BLM? We must abolish Lookism.

The only thing that matters is sending a message.

 

[mlcurrycel]

Look at Venezuela. Socialism always leads to a small amount of people in power enjoying the luxuries of wealth etc... And anyone who's not in the government being poor and starving. It's about power. These people are sick. They can't just be content being rich, they have to have more and above all else they wish to inflict pain upon others.

The billionaires have pedophile parties and infinite cocaine. They can't get any richer. What are you talking about?

 

[mlcurrycel]

@Izayacel Chad's looks are genetic wealth. Marxists Rodgerists will distribute the genetic wealth.

 

[Izayacel]

@Izayacel Chad's looks are genetic wealth. Marxists Rodgerists will distribute the genetic wealth.

You either evolve / move Forward with your Genetics or you Get Left Out in the dust

 

[Macrocephalus]

Hindus were united and we never hurt the Jews. That's a hole in your argument

Don't know about that but it's usually been the case in Europe.
It's not just Jews btw. When a society is homogeneous whenever there's a issues you can blame "others". In European society usually those "others" were Jewish, because they were the only minority. In a multiethnic society there's no "others" because there isn't one clearly predominant group

 

[oakhaigh]

But should socialists support incels?

they hate us like most normies do