It's whiteknighting because it's jumping to defend foids.
Lmao people like you are a fuckin cancer prancing around on your high horse acting all self righteous you sound like a typical TRIGGERED white knight reddit soy cuck
Still can't tell if these guys are legitimately unable to comprehend the definition of pedophilia, or whether being intellectually dishonest is genuinely intended as a method to change minds.
If any, I'd be defending 13.yo, not males or females in particular. It is not whiteknighting because I'm arguing for a common sense moral stance that kids at that age aren't properly equipped to have sexual relations with adults, especially 20 years older than them. If any, moralfag is the only insult that you could try to use.
Either way, he's a long-standing member of the community. As are the others. It's an issue that will continue to come up.
Its white knighting because you're defending waaaamyn that don't give a fuck about you what you think you're gknna cash in your REESPUCTING waaamynz points to get pussy lol and I'm a black pilled user brah I'm not out here tryna fuck 13 year olds because i aint catching a case from you moralfag white knights
I don't think wanting a relationship with a sexually developed young girl is immoral by any means, but if you had just presented your moral case and debated like the other guy did, I'd have respected you more. What you did instead was insulting, shaming other incels for their sexual preferences (natural ones, mind you), and spread bluepilled status-quo based opinions (it's natural for a younger guy to lust after JBs but it's not after a certain arbitrary age anymore - @RageAgainstTDL 's thread proves you're wrong on that with scientific data).
Strawman.
Another strawman. Like I said in the OP, no one is obliged to feel attraction for JBs, inceldom/the blackpill aren't dependent on it. But when you come here to shame and mischaracterize incels who feel attracted to sexually developed underage girls as "pedos", as well as whiteknighting, then I have a problem.
That sounds like some improvement from the shit you were spouting before. Good.
I've never seen him until recently. I don't know what you're talking about. Perhaps you know something I don't, but to me he's a complete no namer
Haha go back to reddit you cuck because you're out here taking shit to the extreme no one said "its over because you didn't fuck a 1st grader" you cucks triggered and take things to an extreme and say your done and try to end on your pseudo self RIGHTEOUS note lol fuck off back to your soylent and letting Jamaal fuck your wife. Im not saying I fuck kids i just hate fucking cucks like you
We aren't here to cater to normies and cucks, and this thread isn't breaking any rules nor contains anything illegal.
Failing to effectively wreck a thread after being out-debated, and then requesting someone else to come in and clean up your mess.
What do you think would happen if cuckedshaman or and other youtuber with a big enough audience or any msm outlet start using threads like this to claim that this forum is full of pedos? do you seriously think there wouldn't be enough backlash from the normies to get the host to drop us? it'll be incels.me all over again.
Nothing that couldn't already happen anyway. The .me domain didn't kick the forum because of incels saying JBs are hot.
no one was out debated. My concerns are legit, even sites in the deep web have been dealt with whenever pedos were involved. We can keep arguing in a chat if you want. I really enjoy stuff like this.
True, but pro free speech advocates have enough political power to balance that, pedos is a different issue, almost literally no one backs that.
outsiders can also attack the forum for "misogyny", "racism", "homophobia"... the list is endless. who cares about appeasing them, really?
Elab?
It's all about negative emotions and lookism. Notice @Mik_TFL 's comments whenever he talks about older people approaching younger people. It's all a pre-conceived scenario full of lookism-based prejudice, "the old foid with her pussy full of herpes forcing it onto a young teenager", "and old 30 yo coercing a young girl", etc.
Your sister should learn how to clean a house, knit, take care of children, and most of all, she should learn about the joys of motherhood. She doesn't need math or anything they teach at a school. 15-20 is the right age for marriage. I think it's ok for a 30-year-old to marry a 15-year-old girl as long as he's financially stable and treats her well.
I don't have this impression judging by my empirical experience around teenagers. For example, when I was at the nudist beach in Germany, the naked JB there, with whom I talked (I didn't make a move on her or anything, just talked about swimming, playing ball, etc) clearly showed disinterest in me, just like an 18, 25, or 30 yo foid would do. I fail to see how I would be able to manipulate her.
I don't do any of that. I'm a manchild. I still feel like I'm 14. The only difference is, I look 30.
In a heartbeat. If I could get a pretty girl by those means and don't get into trouble I'd do it without any doubt.
If you're committing crimes, yeah, mods must act. Inciting crimes ("go ER!") is a crime, saying JBs are hot is not. Not even in the most cucked countries there are.
My problem has more to do with the asymmetric nature of the relationship mentally speaking. Making a reference to other of your threads, a 30 y.o with 12 or 15 years of mental retardation could conceivably date a 15 y.o without that asymmetry being problematic, but such would be an extremely rare case. A 14 y.o still has his/her innocence (or at least most have) while a 30 y.o doesn't. More problems arise if someone ends up pregnant or a widow, a 14 y.o isn't ready to become a parent and enter the workforce, it is a waste of potential. We all failed to experience teenage love, the exploring of each other's bodies and loosing each other's innocence, I think it is important for teenagers to experience that. A 30 y.o can't give them that. The mind of a 13-14 y.o really is different to the one of a 30 y.o. And just to clarify, I'm not claiming moral superiority here, after all I've confessed to being a murderer in other posts, as someone who knows what it's like to lose your innocence at 13, it was a mistake, the world of adults and the one of kids shouldn't be mixed in those ways.
It is an entertaining thread after all
Tbh
This.
Let they stay a bit to lose discussions and then ban them
I strongly agree, If they want to dissuade minors from engaging in sexual acts with adults then, punishing the minor along the adult should be enforced,. While I wouldn't agree with this method at least it's consistent and far better than just punishing the adult and claiming the minor is 100% innocent.
Giga IQ. The poll I promoted showed that the vast majority of users agree that agecucking is a form of whiteknighting, and whiteknighting is already against the rules. I don't know why the moderation rejected my thread on the suggestions section about agecucking being added to the things that are against the rules. It would be just adding 2 and 2 together, really.
