there is actual research on this phenomenon. Whenever they encounter data that contradicts their preconceived notions of women, they create insane excuses to explain away these things.
Examples would be:
- data that shows female violence level is equal or worse than mens
- data that shows female sexuality rivals mens
- data that shows female attraction to violence, rape, children, animals and more
I can give two examples that were discovered on this forum.
1. Meredith Chivers (?) discovered that women are aroused by lesbian porn as well as animal porn. She then defended this by literally saying that vagina arousal does somehow not correspond to actual arousal in women. At the same time, courts use penile-swelling detecting devices to establish whether an offender is aroused by pedophilic stimuli or not.
2. In another paper they subjected women to a false-lie detector test. When women thought they couldn't get away with lying, their self-reported sexual partner count doubled. This study was replicated years later, and this time the numbers got even worse. Again, they had to add that this does not imply women are equally as sexual as men bla bla.
Quote from findings on female attraction to lesbian and animal porn:
"The women in the study, on the other hand, didn't react as predictably. While they reported feeling aroused in the ways you might expect (straight women were turned on by men, lesbians by women), measurements of their vaginal blood flow showed that they were physically aroused by all the forms of coupling they saw — even the bonobos.”
"There's the possibility that genital response for women is not necessarily imbued with meaning about her sexual interests," says Chivers. She also emphasized that her findings do not imply women harbor a latent desire for lesbian sex or bestiality."
lists.ibiblio.org
Quote from finding on female self-reported partner count doubling when they thought they couldn't lie:
"This pattern should be interpreted cautiously because the overall interaction between participants sex and testing condition was not significant."
The thread: https://incels.is/threads/womens-partner-count-doubled-when-they-thought-they-were-hooked-up-to-a-lie-detector.209222/ The Study it refers to: https://www.amherst.edu/media/view/239672/original/Alexander+%26+Fisher+%282003%29.pdf The Articles linked in the thread: a) Article about...
incels.is
Additional information on how researchers having a negative bias towards pro-male and anti-female findings, and a positive bias towards anti-male and pro-female findings:
It's OK to be male
www.emilkirkegaard.com
Analysis finds that across the board, there is pro-female bias in society. - research findings that report favorably on male traits are viewed as less credible - research that reports unfavorably on women is viewed as less credible - pro-female bias is deliberately misconstrued as being harmful...
incels.is
I took this from a Reddit post. Men without any power or privilege (most men) are deffinitely victims of a lot of bullshit. Something society likes to ignore. There is a lot of research where the authors admit that they expected to find evidence of discrimination against women, but instead...
incels.is
Its continuing popularity is no surprise to Lee Jussim, a social psychologist at Rutgers, who has surveyed the research literature. His analysis shows that studies reporting bias against female scientists tend to have much smaller samples (typically fewer than 200 subjects) than the studies that...
incels.is
