Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Why some people say that sand smv is better than rice and curry smv

Mohamedömar

Mohamedömar

The Next Jihadi
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 4, 2025
Posts
6,755
Online time
5d 6h
I saw some people say that sand smv is better than rice and curry smv, why? why some brown and arab people in europe and usa have better chances than asians and indians?
 
In the vast majority of cases this boils down to "grass is greener" reasoning. If someone says this, chances are they're asian or indian and see their race as being the most disadvantaged. Ultimately it comes down to a lot of people here seeing themselves are the ultimate "truecel" and the less like them you are, the "less incel" you are.

This logic sometimes leads to some insanely delusional takes, like some slavs say that 5'6 indians get slavic women easier than the average slav. :feelskek:
 
Sandniggers can fill the thugmaxx niche in jewrope due to lack of niggers. Rice and currycels are just invisible.
 
I said that "just be sand is law" in another thread but I wasn't being serious.

In Nordic countries I would describe MENA SMV as being mostly neutral, though slightly less neutral than native Nordics of course. For Indians, Asians, South Americans and so on it is more divisive, their SMV is viewed either positively or negatively (but always less positively than natives of course). Sub-Saharan Africans (fresh from Africa, not people of Sub-Saharan African descent) tend to have poor SMV in Nordic countries, even though some hags here love to do sex tourism in Africa.

The reason MENA people have a neutral SMV in Nordic countries is because Nordics are highly ignorant about MENA countries (the reason for this is because MENA countries lack both soft power and hard power in the Nordics, compared to other countries). Nordics are highly ignorant about everything really, they just think that they know things about India, Asia and South America even though they don't. Thugmaxxing is the only way to have positive SMV as a MENA in Nordic countries. The only way to have negative SMV as a MENA in the Nordics is to be a stereotypical Jew. Being extremely religious or nationalistic for your home country won't effect your SMV at all.

As for dating and marrying Nordics in general, what you have to remember is that Nordics will never actually respect and engage with any outside culture, and that's even if they say they will. The reason for this is because Nordics don't think they have a culture, even though they do, so they can't even comprehend what a culture is. The best thing you'll get out of a Nordic is something like kebabpizza, AKA the pinnacle of Nordic cultural insensitivity. As for Nordic "culture" itself, all I have to say is that you should be grateful that you haven't had to witness it.

It should go without saying, but my observations here are of course generally only relevant to non-Westerners with good stats. I only brought up Nordic countries, because I have no idea how things play out for ethnics in other Western countries.
 
Last edited:
In the vast majority of cases this boils down to "grass is greener" reasoning. If someone says this, chances are they're asian or indian and see their race as being the most disadvantaged. Ultimately it comes down to a lot of people here seeing themselves are the ultimate "truecel" and the less like them you are, the "less incel" you are.

This logic sometimes leads to some insanely delusional takes, like some slavs say that 5'6 indians get slavic women easier than the average slav. :feelskek:
mmmm got you
 
Because sands are atleast successful at mateguarding their foids, plus sandniggers are objectively not as ugly as curries and chinks due to caucasoid bonestructure. Also, the main cause of inceldom in regards to sandniggers is the cultural failo rather than a genetic one
 
Because sands are atleast successful at mateguarding their foids, plus sandniggers are objectively not as ugly as curries and chinks due to caucasoid bonestructure. Also, the main cause of inceldom in regards to sandniggers is the cultural failo rather than a genetic one
I am arab and at the same time my genetics are very very bad and made me sub5 incel
 
I agree sands do but Indians are the lowest smv race but what helps them is their women also are some of the lowest smv. Asian females on ok Cupid do even better than white women while Asian males have exceptionally low smv also SMV depends as an Arab if you're fairer or not.
 
curries and ricecels are some of the most docile most high inhib humans on this planet. They’ll go to the bathroom all over themselves if a foid should ever touch them. Sands are usually the opposite I think that’s one factor.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

SewerPolarKoala
Replies
10
Views
415
SewerPolarKoala
SewerPolarKoala
SlayerSlayer
Replies
3
Views
527
SmhChan
SmhChan
Mohamedömar
Replies
46
Views
1K
Mohamedömar
Mohamedömar
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
5
Views
904
LeFrenchCel
LeFrenchCel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top