Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Why Radical Feminists Oppose Porn

  • Thread starter Deleted member 20056
  • Start date
Much like the communist bemoans the horrors of capitalism, but seems to take pleasure seeing its dysfunction and even encourages it, or the incel who copes by saying that by 2020 90% of men will be incel but yet endorses Tinder precisely for that reason,

I suppose there are ideas that are so strong that the only way to convince people who believe in them that they are wrong, is to let them go through with it, and see by themselves that it doesn't work.

Women have been oppressed for so long that men have forgotten why. Or rather, they used to think it was God's will. As men stopped believing in God, they were not quite sure why women should not be free.

Men need to set women free so they can see by themselves what kind of shitshow happens then.
 
Last edited:
I get the feeling youre giving foids way too much credit if youre saying that they willfully engage in accelerationism...
In general, women do not live conscious lives. Radical feminists are considerably more intelligent and reflective than 'liberal feminists', but most radical feminists still do not even have the self-awareness to realize that they're not attracted to 'good personalities' or whatever the fuck. These hidden agendas I have referred to are not hidden only to who they impact, but also largely to the women who are possessed by them. Though radical feminists may at least realize that a porn ban is accelerationism.
Big takeaway is: foids under no circumstance want a male revolution of any sort.
I disagree that some foids, particularly radical feminists, would not want a 'male' revolution (the more immediate and violent kind of revolution) despite the fact that it's against their own interests. There are plenty of embittered foids with a knack for destruction who want to see the civilization around them torn down. However, I did not say it would be a 'male' revolution, and it is not what I had in mind. It would be a psychological revolution first and foremost, the violence comes later, and it's institutional.
Also, what else are foids supposed to do to get anywhere in life? Work for it? When theyre easily outperformed by men in every regard and every oportunity with the same ressources? Id try my hand at being a manipulative bitch as well, even if Id make a bad one, they have no other chance.
This is why women have evolved their capacity for social and political manipulation. They're impotent and not very bright.
 
In general, women do not live conscious lives. Radical feminists are considerably more intelligent and reflective than 'liberal feminists', but most radical feminists still do not even have the self-awareness to realize that they're not attracted to 'good personalities' or whatever the fuck. These hidden agendas I have referred to are not hidden only to who they impact, but also largely to the women who are possessed by them. Though radical feminists may at least realize that a porn ban is accelerationism.

Yeah, misunderstood you then, its not very clever to make out foids as complete idiots, theyre not braindead after all, they probably realize that they´re playing with fire but arent capable of imagining serious consequences, just as you said, lack consciousness compared to men.

I disagree that some foids, particularly radical feminists, would not want a 'male' revolution (the more immediate and violent kind of revolution) despite the fact that it's against their own interests. There are plenty of embittered foids with a knack for destruction who want to see the civilization around them torn down. However, I did not say it would be a 'male' revolution, and it is not what I had in mind. It would be a psychological revolution first and foremost, the violence comes later, and it's institutional.

Meant it as a psychological revolution as well, only with men being at the forefront and defining the narrative, in that way, a revolution would be fueled by a feeling of restoring civilization and conservative/traditional ideals. Rad feminists wouldnt get any destruction, even if I find it plausible that they actually want that, so I still dont think they are behind such an "uprising", just a power play for them.
Also, interesting that you bring up institutional violence at a later point, never thought about it that way, was too much influenced by "day of the rope" like imagery, but could very well see such things happen, tend to underestimate peoples stake in vengeance fantasies in contrast to "simple" rage.
 
Basically, women want a monopoly on sex, and porn is a threat to that, as it is technically an alternative to sex (even if it is extremely diluted).
 
They are tirrified that porn replaces them because their only use is sex
 
It should be clear at this point, with porn not contributing to a significant increase in violent crime, that the bulk of this modern feminist opposition to porn is to curtail male behaviours regardless of how much actual harm they inflict upon foids. At best they're misguided and downright malicious at worst. I believe porn, among other things, has had more of a negative, placating effect on men and this is why I think opposing it or at least wishing to limit consumption on these grounds is more of a sound position for men.

Arguments to the tune of foids wishing to maintain the "sex cartel" are relevant, but I don't see porn as being a huge threat to foids at least at this juncture. Perhaps in the future if male/foid interactions continue to decline.
 
Don't listen to what feminists say about anything, they are legitimately insane.
You want to know how feminists feel about porn? Look at how they feel about prostitution. What country is it that made prostitution legal - but only for the prostitute? Being a john seeking the service out is still illegal.
THAT is how feminists feel about porn. If they had their way, they would make consumption of porn illegal but the production of it legal.
 
they want all pornsites deleted but then replaces with 1 national/global porn site where you need a 2 week photo facial verification process to see if you can look at the porn or be blocked off the site, I.E. if you’d already be able to have sex with a girl anyways:feelsthink::feelsthink::feelsthink:
 
I think actual violent porn is bad but violent porn goes both ways.
 
Porn is a weapon. When jews invaded this city (forgot the name) they captured the broadcasting services and played porn all day everyday on TV. If porn was a good thing why would a people coming to conquer you play porn on your national TV if it was a good thing?

It happened in Iran when the Shah was installed by the British. The govt played porn in theaters, but I'm not sure if it was played on national TV, though it wouldn't be implausible.

It corrupted entire generations.
 
Based and TVpilled.
Porn is a weapon and corrupts entire generations of men , who so happen to be its biggest consumers. In the stone age men would only see maybe 4 or 5 10/10 stacy's in their entire life - now if you browse a porn site or even watch standard TV for a few minutes you see hundreds of 10/10 stacies! Mens brains werent wired to see that many aesthetic foids that frequently. Its causing sensory overstimulation and destroying our dopamine receptors sensitivity leading to men who are docile and feminine who are easily controlled by foids and jooz jfl
It happened in Iran when the Shah was installed by the British. The govt played porn in theaters, but I'm not sure if it was played on national TV, though it wouldn't be implausible.

It corrupted entire generations.
 
Blaming porn for inceldom? Typical nofapper bullshit
 
I have participated in GC chats on reddit and stuff and tbh, I’m of a mind to agree with the radfems. Not on every issue they present. But definitely on pornography. It’s kind of disgusting.
 
High IQ
What would radfem repression of males even look like in real life though? Ultra strict anti rape nanny state?
 
Radical feminists hate porn because they hate male sexuality. They want every man who isn't a Chad to be an eunuch not allowed even to masturbate.
 
High IQ
What would radfem repression of males even look like in real life though? Ultra strict anti rape nanny state?
Women negotiate all their power socially, and feminism as a whole is basically society wide nagging. Punishment for not taking heed of the nagging would be institutionalized. Although I do not want to give the sense that I believe it's certain that women would be able to do any of this fully, I'm only explaining why they agitate towards it and not what the result will be.
 
Women negotiate all their power socially, and feminism as a whole is basically society wide nagging. Punishment for not taking heed of the nagging would be institutionalized. Although I do not want to give the sense that I believe it's certain that women would be able to do any of this fully, I'm only explaining why they agitate towards it and not what the result will be.
Makes sense.
 

Similar threads

XDFLAMEBOY
Replies
12
Views
544
XDFLAMEBOY
XDFLAMEBOY
Seahorsecel
Replies
6
Views
213
faded
faded
Seahorsecel
Replies
4
Views
273
Buried Alive 2.0
Buried Alive 2.0
MisfitPerson
Replies
15
Views
346
Spooky_Heejin
Spooky_Heejin
A
Replies
7
Views
400
SociallyStupid
S

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top