Among feminists there is a disagreement on whether or not porn is good. Typically radical feminists are against it, citing the inability to consent to sex that's negotiated by money, the objectification of women's bodies, the abuse many women face in a supposedly exploitative porn industry, etc. On the other hand, 'liberal' feminists (as the radical feminists call them) support porn and view it as ultimately empowering, a good way to blow off steam and easily meet people's needs. I have even seen 'liberal' feminists argue that porn consumption makes people more egalitarian, while radical feminists argue it makes men misogynistic.
Analyzing this divide through a blackpill lens, the 'liberal' feminists seem to make more sense insomuch as the hidden agenda is to pacify beta men by getting them addicted to porn. This is essentially psychological castration because once betas qwell their sexual needs through voluntary consumption of pornographic material they're left passive, less willing to hound women for sex, and less inclined to violence. If the secret motive of 'liberal' feminists is to encourage over-consumption of porn for its castrating effect on men, then why would radical feminists be against pornography? What is their hidden agenda? First let us dispense with the conventional notions radical feminists use to obscure their objectives. It has nothing to do with the sex industry. Radical feminists are against porn in every form you could conceive. If a 10-year-old boy drew a stick figure with long hair and breasts, radical feminists would view it as diseased. Imagine a context in which a radical feminist approved of porn, but do not try too hard or you will hurt yourself. They are also not anti-porn because porn makes men misbehave. In fact it is the opposite. Consider the increase in 'bad behavior' if porn were to be outlawed. What manner of undesirable and sexless man would be attempting to court these women, and how aggressive would they be? It may then seem that radical feminists are simply stupid to advocate for things that will turn out badly for women, but for those of us who are familiar with Woman, we know she is acquainted with infinitely more subtle and clever trickery.
Much like the communist bemoans the horrors of capitalism, but seems to take pleasure seeing its dysfunction and even encourages it, or the incel who copes by saying that by 2020 90% of men will be incel but yet endorses Tinder precisely for that reason, the radical feminist seeks to make the conditions of the world (and even her own conditions) so burdensome and intolerable that revolution is inevitable. They want to impoverish, frustrate and alienate men so that upon the response of men they can be cast as violent brutes, making whatever actions taken against them righteous and justified.
Analyzing this divide through a blackpill lens, the 'liberal' feminists seem to make more sense insomuch as the hidden agenda is to pacify beta men by getting them addicted to porn. This is essentially psychological castration because once betas qwell their sexual needs through voluntary consumption of pornographic material they're left passive, less willing to hound women for sex, and less inclined to violence. If the secret motive of 'liberal' feminists is to encourage over-consumption of porn for its castrating effect on men, then why would radical feminists be against pornography? What is their hidden agenda? First let us dispense with the conventional notions radical feminists use to obscure their objectives. It has nothing to do with the sex industry. Radical feminists are against porn in every form you could conceive. If a 10-year-old boy drew a stick figure with long hair and breasts, radical feminists would view it as diseased. Imagine a context in which a radical feminist approved of porn, but do not try too hard or you will hurt yourself. They are also not anti-porn because porn makes men misbehave. In fact it is the opposite. Consider the increase in 'bad behavior' if porn were to be outlawed. What manner of undesirable and sexless man would be attempting to court these women, and how aggressive would they be? It may then seem that radical feminists are simply stupid to advocate for things that will turn out badly for women, but for those of us who are familiar with Woman, we know she is acquainted with infinitely more subtle and clever trickery.
Much like the communist bemoans the horrors of capitalism, but seems to take pleasure seeing its dysfunction and even encourages it, or the incel who copes by saying that by 2020 90% of men will be incel but yet endorses Tinder precisely for that reason, the radical feminist seeks to make the conditions of the world (and even her own conditions) so burdensome and intolerable that revolution is inevitable. They want to impoverish, frustrate and alienate men so that upon the response of men they can be cast as violent brutes, making whatever actions taken against them righteous and justified.
Last edited:
