Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Hypocrisy Why Jeremy Meeks being an ‘extreme example’ doesn’t disprove the blackpill in any way

ColdLightOfDay

ColdLightOfDay

Serge’s alt.
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 18, 2018
Posts
5,702
IT and other fellow minded denialists often use the excuse that the case of Jeremy Meeks should be discounted because he is an ‘extreme example’ of how looks can positively affect your life, and thus is not reflective of the general human experience when it comes to the importance of looks and their baring on life opportunities and general quality of life.

Because Meeks is extremely good looking, it makes sense that his advantages should also come in the extreme, someone who is moderately good looking will likely experience moderate advantages and
someone who is moderately ugly should thus likely experience moderate disadvantages.

But what about someone who is extremely ugly? (This is what an incel is) Why can they not accept that those who are ugly to the extent that Meeks is good looking will have at least as much to lose by being that ugly than he has to gain by being that good looking?

It makes absolutely no sense that the dynamic should only work one way and it is irrefutable testament to the wilful ignorance of IT that they continue to see it as so.
 
If there ever was beta uprising (in lego start wars) meeks should become first target.
 
If there ever was beta uprising (in lego start wars) meeks should become first target.

I would target cucks first, i only envy Chad, do not hate him.
 
Bullseye. The blackpill doesn't have outliers. It's the same thing as when people say "I know an ugly guy that has a girlfriend..." well show us proof of his face to see how ugly he REALLY is.

At Meeks' case they say that it's an extreme example but remember that when someone says that they're ugly they say "beauty is in the eye of the beholder sweaty!!!!". They are retardmaxxing.
 
Shit's exponential. The life of a 9/10 guy is exponentially better than the one of a 7/10 guy, the life of this 7/10 guy is exponentially better than the one of a 5/10 normie, which is in turn exponentially better than the one of a 3/10 incel.

It's like the amount of experience that it takes to go from level 98 to 99 in an RPG, compare to the amount it takes to go from level 5 to 6 for example.
 
Immanuel Kant IQ
 
If there ever was beta uprising (in lego start wars) meeks should become first target.
Too many girls at first to worry about Jeremy Meeks lol
 
If there ever was beta uprising (in lego start wars) meeks should become first target.
This tbh

He goes from being a criminal, literal threat to society who did not give a fuck about the law and mugshots of him garners him fame and fortune then proceeds to virtue signal about foid's rights and all this other political Bullshit when if he were a sub5male he would probably rape foids to his last days and end up dead in some random ditch from whatever shithole he came from.
 
I would target cucks first, i only envy Chad, do not hate him.
Let's not be hypocrites. If we were chad we would do the same thing. Cucks and their betabuxxing are much worse.
 
Let's not be hypocrites. If we were chad we would do the same thing. Cucks and their betabuxxing are much worse.

and that's why i said i'd kill cucks and not meeks.
 

Similar threads

lyrootics
Replies
2
Views
424
Low_iq_king5
Low_iq_king5
Mixedcel59
Replies
8
Views
925
ogercel
ogercel
S
Replies
64
Views
1K
ColderManTruce
ColderManTruce
Cryo
Replies
11
Views
505
cripplecel
cripplecel
FoidsEnshittifyAll
Replies
189
Views
4K
The Notorious SLAV
The Notorious SLAV

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top