I'm pretty sure if the child is prepubescent the act will simply make them uncomfortable.
Sex is generally uncomfortable for any foid if there's no foreplay/arousal
However although I know it's pretty widely accepted that early sexual experiences usually lead to depression
Normies "widely accept" a bunch of lies and bullshit. They skew "science" studies to suit preconceived notions and goals.
and shit like that after the child has grown, I will say I don't know whether that is because of society or a natural reaction and I really don't feel like searching this shit up, and since I don't think society is changing anytime soon when it comes to this issue, for now it's the same result.
Basically the negativity surrounding it are big factors that would fuck up psychology, the necessary secrecy/guilt
That of course skews any possible study you could do on inherent factors divorced from those social-induced ramifications
women think having sex with non chad men is disgusting
the younger the woman is the more disgusting she finds it actually
This seems like a cope to me TBH.
I think women get more disgusted by sub-Chad men as the go foreward in life and become more twisted/entitled by society.
You can have outliers who are the reverse and become less entitled in time (humble gentlewomen) but they are the exception to the norm.
I'm pretty sure it's quite accurate to say 10~ yo girls wouldn't want their uncle anywhere near them.
On average yes but there's no universal rule, attraction is always circumstantial.
She might legit feel different if she really likes his personality but then normies would condemn that as 'grooming'.
PEOPLE WHO THINK LIKE THIS ARE FEMINISTS EVEN IF THEY DON'T KNOW IT.
I don't know if I'd even term it feminism at this point because their alarmism is actually bad for the foid population in the long term.
It's basically a bunch of ancient foids so concerned with their SMV that they demonize anyone who dares not prioritize roasties as sex objects.
I'd struggle to call that "feminism" when it's like the female version of Cronus eating Zeus. More like "pseudo-feminism".
The young virginal foids these roasties are denying happiness are more "female" than the roasties who via microchimerism have become hermaphrodites by being 90% chad cum after thousand-mile carousel rides.
So it is basically the less feminine waging war against the more feminine... can we really call that "feminism" ?
Feminism should be about the greater good for foids long-term and "feminism" is not.
It's kind of like how alleged "Liberalism" these days is actually fascism in disguise, and "Democrats" are subverting the voting system w/ duplicate votes and voter intimidation.
It's actually pseudo-liberals, pseudo-democrats and pseudo-feminists who are the enemy here.
Legit feminists, legit liberals and legit democrats were ousted a long time ago from the groups which bear these names now.