Hitler failed because he attacked the Soviet Union. Had this dumb mule conceded some ground to Molotov in december 1940, he could have stayed friends with the Soviets and finished the UK off before moving on the USA with the help of Japan. Stalin had absolutely no intention of attacking Germany.
Hmm I remember there was a book that exposed stalin’s secret plans of attacking Germany, and that’s why hitler took action.
Yes, it's called Icebreaker by Suvorov. But you're not supposed to take seriously every fringe book peddled on StormFront, are you? Most of the evidence is that Stalin was not preparing an attack on Germany at the time Hitler attacked, and that Stalin genuinely believed in the friendship of Hitler.
Suvorov is pretty much disproved by every regular historian. His theories are fringe as fuck. You can blame anti-nazi bias for that, but be careful not to stray away too much from mainstream historians; I've done that before, and you can get burned by cranks.
Proof? Never heard of the book myself but I’m sure there are many other books than this one.
I've never talked about "blaming yourself", but blaming your genes. Sizeable difference here.
Underage sex is illegal, but that doesn't stop anyone.
Even a UK source admitted that Stalin actually wanted to ally with France and Britain to stop hitler in 1939, but because they didn’t agree, he went to Germany to make a peace.
Yeah no shit... But then the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact happened. Look it up. Stalin gobbled up the Nazis' new intentions of peace. Ribbentrop was so dismayed by Hitler's decision to betray the Soviet Union that he was almost fainting on the 22nd of June 1941, according to Anthony Beevor's Stalingrad.
Btw the book regarding that author is controversial and maybe not convincing (similar to Alfred Kinsey and how the cucks call him “debunked”), but not refuted. There’s still a debate about the topic.
Put yourself in Stalin's place: your worst enemies are fighting viciously and bombing themselves to oblivion. Do you attack them, or wait until they have finished bleeding themselves? If Stalin were to attack Germany, he would have waited until the very end... same way the US intervened in WW1 at the very end... it made no sense for him to attack in 1941.
I agree it might have been a mistake tbh, btw what’s your stance on the holocaust?
It was the worst strategic mistake in the military history of man. It doomed Germany to death. It may even have doomed the West to death. Hitler probably doesn't deserve to bear alone this mistake on his shoulders; after all, his intelligence services had repeatedly told him inaccuracies about the strength of the Soviets. The Soviets had always actually been far stronger than the Germans; they had a vastly superior tank, for instance (the T34). And they had already implemented techniques of mass production. Only their aviation was inferior. So much for Slavic inferiority...
Aspects of it might have been exaggerated by the Allies and the Jews, but you have to be very ignorant of the data to deny that persecution of Jews, including murder, has happened a lot during WW2. If only on the Ostfront...
Move to the middle east, then
One thing that revisionists don’t deny is the einstatprugen or some shit like that, but there’s a lot of questions regarding these “death” camps and shit
Why not turn western society into traditional Christendom and white shariah like it always was before the 1900s
Does it really make sense to blame anything if you don't believe in free will? After all, the decisions of your parents can be traced down to a succession of environmental influences...
JFL at using the nature argument, it’s deluded. In modern society even if you have average genes you’re pretty much screwed due to socially inflated hypergamy.
That's the saddest cope in incel communities and you know it
You used to live in prehistoric times, to be that much informed?
I’m only making possible reasonings of what probably happened...
Yes, but not in the way it's usually thought about. When most people hear about the "singularity", they think about an enchanted future and endless days of bliss, and they tend to be skeptical because it sounds too good to be true. It is too good to be true. My view of this event is more in line with a pure focus on artificial intelligence, AI alignment and AI takeover scenarios (which are surprisingly scientifically solid). I think the best-case scenario is for us to fuse with AI (and lose most of our identity in the process), worst case is ending up killed for our atoms.
Here is how his predictions have fared: http://www.kurzweilai.net/images/How-My-Predictions-Are-Faring.pdf
Depends how you define incel. Most blue pill normies go through long dry spells, get laid once in blue moon with low quality women, then encounters nearing wall foid with baby rabies, get married, then divorced and cycle repeats.
Talking to this forum often feels like a conversation with my teenage self. (I too used to believe in "revolutions", or in feelings of unwarranted superiority over normies). It's frustrating, because reason often has a very limited impact compared to emotions. Though most of the neo-nazis here, for instance, know the chances of success of their ideas are grim, they still want to cling to them to feel meaning, power and belonging in their lives. It's all an ego protection mechanism. Because you're a party-pooper, all arguments fall on deaf ears and you just receive epithets: cuck, jew, idiot...
Oh, indeed. But can you really expect asocial NEETs to get that? They never talk to normies to understand their viewpoint, even on the internet. No point in talking to "brainwashed cucks", right.
