The term "moralfag" is popularly used to describe people who:
1) think it's wrong for men above a given arbitrary age to have sex or relationships with women under another given arbitrary age, even if such women are already sexually developed and sexually active
2) think men who download CP from the internet without paying anything for it should be jailed or forcefully intervened by the government in some other way (more often than not considering the nature of the crime depicted in this kind of media suis generis , i.e. the only one whose simple possession in media format should be outlawed)
In the first category aforementioned, the use of the term "moralfag" is utterly misapplied. There's absolutely nothing moral about arbitrarily choosing which men can fuck a sexually mature woman freely and which deserve to get their lives ruined over the same action. The term "agecuck" is much more adequate, because those men are basically cucks for young women. "I will mount guard for you so you can fuck teen Chad without any adult men (category that includes myself) bothering you, m'lady."
In the second category, yeah, it is immoral to enjoy CP, but the fact is that someone who just downloaded media for free from the internet should not be criminalized if we are to use consistent, objective criteria for what should be a crime and what should not (as opposed to using criteria like "they gave attention to it!", "they enjoyed it!", etc - giving attention to things or enjoying things should not be crimes, just apply it universally and you easily see why this is the case). (As argued by me here)
For this second class of so-called "moralfags", there are two terms more suitable: if he wants to criminalize simple possession/watching of all media containing crimes, they're for an authoritarian, intrusive, tyrannical, anti-freedom type of government that heavily controls what people can watch or not on the internet. He could be described as "authoritarian". If they think CP is something suis generis for whatever arbitrary emotional reasons they give to differ it from torture, murder or other crimes, the term for them should be HYPOCRITE.
There's a third common use to the term "moralfag" which is basically "someone who's against little children being actually raped". In this case, the term is pretty much moot because anyone with basic morals and/or empathy is against that, probably most pedophiles included even.
1) think it's wrong for men above a given arbitrary age to have sex or relationships with women under another given arbitrary age, even if such women are already sexually developed and sexually active
2) think men who download CP from the internet without paying anything for it should be jailed or forcefully intervened by the government in some other way (more often than not considering the nature of the crime depicted in this kind of media suis generis , i.e. the only one whose simple possession in media format should be outlawed)
In the first category aforementioned, the use of the term "moralfag" is utterly misapplied. There's absolutely nothing moral about arbitrarily choosing which men can fuck a sexually mature woman freely and which deserve to get their lives ruined over the same action. The term "agecuck" is much more adequate, because those men are basically cucks for young women. "I will mount guard for you so you can fuck teen Chad without any adult men (category that includes myself) bothering you, m'lady."
In the second category, yeah, it is immoral to enjoy CP, but the fact is that someone who just downloaded media for free from the internet should not be criminalized if we are to use consistent, objective criteria for what should be a crime and what should not (as opposed to using criteria like "they gave attention to it!", "they enjoyed it!", etc - giving attention to things or enjoying things should not be crimes, just apply it universally and you easily see why this is the case). (As argued by me here)
For this second class of so-called "moralfags", there are two terms more suitable: if he wants to criminalize simple possession/watching of all media containing crimes, they're for an authoritarian, intrusive, tyrannical, anti-freedom type of government that heavily controls what people can watch or not on the internet. He could be described as "authoritarian". If they think CP is something suis generis for whatever arbitrary emotional reasons they give to differ it from torture, murder or other crimes, the term for them should be HYPOCRITE.
There's a third common use to the term "moralfag" which is basically "someone who's against little children being actually raped". In this case, the term is pretty much moot because anyone with basic morals and/or empathy is against that, probably most pedophiles included even.
Last edited:
