This goes against what some people say here but I wanted to make a dedicated thread on this issue.
Before you ask, I would be surprised if IT touches this thread. Even if they do, they will take the bad statements I put here out of context and farm updoots. They certainly want to frame us as monoliths that all think rape is justified in all cases, when the truth is far more nuanced. Good segway into the meat of this thread.
Much like I explained with the penis pill, opinions on the forum about rape are on a spectrum. On one extreme are the people who say rape is bad in all situations, on the other are those who say the concept of consent is complete horse shit and mass rape should be normalised.
I am towards the former, but I am not someone who agrees with the notion completely that "all rape is unjustified". MOST rape is, but not all.
In my view, rape is only justified if ALL of the following criteria are met:
1) Consensual sex is not available to the rapist. (They are not attractive enough for relationships, and hiring escorts is impossible)
2) The rapist acted out of complete impulsivity. (Whoring out means more likely to be impulsive.)
3) The rapist uses appropriate protection. (Not necessary if both are virgins, she'll get an abortion if a pregnancy occurs)
If the rape does not meet all of the above, it is unjustified. How many times do you hear something from the above? Probably not often.
Will this give an excuse for women to whore out? No. If a woman whores herself out on the street, she is asking to be raped. In fact women should not whore out, as it removes the defence of impulsivity in my eyes.
Then, there is the issue of being raped by a faggot.
I've already described what I've thought about faggots before. But, in short: Women think of us the same way we think of faggots. Anything women on IT say about us, we say about faggots. There is a reason why this community is homophobic, and trust me, that is not necessarily a bad thing.
Rape by faggots fails criterion 1 as they have the ability to gain consensual sex easily. Literally 1 hour on Grindr or similar will get them access to as much cock/rearends as they want (as least that's what they have said). They live life on easy mode on this front.
Finally, there is the difference between love (friendship, caring, etc.), and lust (sex). If your desire for love is stronger than lust, you are less likely to believe rape is justified. If lust is stronger, you are more likely to see women as things to use for sex, and rape is more justifiable.
Women also feel love and lust. Ever wonder why women stick around with bad boys sometimes? They don't have much love for them, but they do have a lot of lust. This is why we say "If Chad rapes a woman, she will not report it." or similar.
Thank you for reading this, and IT, if you do screenshot this, please ensure that you do not take my statements out of context please. I will be debunking the points you make against this.
Before you ask, I would be surprised if IT touches this thread. Even if they do, they will take the bad statements I put here out of context and farm updoots. They certainly want to frame us as monoliths that all think rape is justified in all cases, when the truth is far more nuanced. Good segway into the meat of this thread.
Much like I explained with the penis pill, opinions on the forum about rape are on a spectrum. On one extreme are the people who say rape is bad in all situations, on the other are those who say the concept of consent is complete horse shit and mass rape should be normalised.
I am towards the former, but I am not someone who agrees with the notion completely that "all rape is unjustified". MOST rape is, but not all.
In my view, rape is only justified if ALL of the following criteria are met:
1) Consensual sex is not available to the rapist. (They are not attractive enough for relationships, and hiring escorts is impossible)
2) The rapist acted out of complete impulsivity. (Whoring out means more likely to be impulsive.)
3) The rapist uses appropriate protection. (Not necessary if both are virgins, she'll get an abortion if a pregnancy occurs)
If the rape does not meet all of the above, it is unjustified. How many times do you hear something from the above? Probably not often.
Will this give an excuse for women to whore out? No. If a woman whores herself out on the street, she is asking to be raped. In fact women should not whore out, as it removes the defence of impulsivity in my eyes.
Then, there is the issue of being raped by a faggot.
I've already described what I've thought about faggots before. But, in short: Women think of us the same way we think of faggots. Anything women on IT say about us, we say about faggots. There is a reason why this community is homophobic, and trust me, that is not necessarily a bad thing.
Rape by faggots fails criterion 1 as they have the ability to gain consensual sex easily. Literally 1 hour on Grindr or similar will get them access to as much cock/rearends as they want (as least that's what they have said). They live life on easy mode on this front.
Finally, there is the difference between love (friendship, caring, etc.), and lust (sex). If your desire for love is stronger than lust, you are less likely to believe rape is justified. If lust is stronger, you are more likely to see women as things to use for sex, and rape is more justifiable.
Women also feel love and lust. Ever wonder why women stick around with bad boys sometimes? They don't have much love for them, but they do have a lot of lust. This is why we say "If Chad rapes a woman, she will not report it." or similar.
Thank you for reading this, and IT, if you do screenshot this, please ensure that you do not take my statements out of context please. I will be debunking the points you make against this.
Last edited:
