There is a argument floating around that us being incels is justified to prevent further inceldom from being created, mainly spread by cucks and foids who see their whoredom of the highest calibre as something "righteous" and "for the better good in the end" such as this.
First off hypergamy in the end benefits nobody, we don't need the ultimate genetic specimens to lead humanity as we aren't simple animals in the stone ages anymore.There is no underlying threat of being mauled by a sabertooth tiger when you aren't looking and even if there was, the physically superior male would still be likely to have his guts strewn across a rock.Women don't need brutes to protect them, a incel programmer with a gun in his pocket would serve her in life better than 10 of these chads.The men to advance humanity to what it is now were no chads, they would be incel just like us if they were to live today, but they did more notable thing than fuck some hole for the 50th time that year, they were the ones to be written in the history books, not the men foids drool about.
50 or so years ago most of us would be able to create a family and take care of it without the need for good looks or raw brute strength, humanity didn't rise by simply overpowering all our competition, we did it by using our brains, and during the last 2 centuries humanity experienced some of the most technological advancements ever.
Second, some women may say that they want to dating genetically superior men for the future of their children, but we all know that this is a lie.Women are whores, and they do retain the DNA of all men they have had sex with, which means by their late 30s or later when they maybe DO decide to settle down and have children, their genes are already polluted from riding the cock carousel during their most fertile years and getting knocked up by men of basically every race and making mixed monstrosities.They also tend to murder their children which is telling to how much they care about their motherhood in reality.
UNLESS THE MAN YOU DON'T WANT TO HAVE CHILDREN WITH IS A GROWTH-STUNTED DOWN-SYNDROME-RIDDEN SUBHUMAN, BORN WITH SEVERAL STDs YOU HAVE NO REASON NOT TO BREED WITH HIM.
"and the only men who find it problematic are those with nothing to offer to a woman"
In return for that, what do women have to offer to men other than their used up roast beef every couple of months?They are mentally weak and are prone to believe their emotions over basic human logic.They cannot do physical labor as they're physically weak as well, their bones are able to be snapped like twigs by the average man if he wished to do so.
Remember the earthquakes and subsequent floods in Haiti in 2011(I believe)?Guess what women were doing, that's right, they were whoring themselves out just for a loaf of bread daily, they clearly cannot function in the wild without men.
Third point, why does hypergamy only affect men and not women as well?
Seeing as how women aren't exempt from bad genes and not every female has perfect genes, which is what they believe they do and that the entire fate of their child being a incel or a succesful chad or not depends on the male is pretty hypocritical.Infact, I'd wager that most incels here ARE incels because of their mother's side of the genes, usually resulting in them being manlets.Women shouldn't be allowed to choose who to breed with as they will rather be in a relationship with a man who beats her but is more attractive than the man who would treat her with respect.
First off hypergamy in the end benefits nobody, we don't need the ultimate genetic specimens to lead humanity as we aren't simple animals in the stone ages anymore.There is no underlying threat of being mauled by a sabertooth tiger when you aren't looking and even if there was, the physically superior male would still be likely to have his guts strewn across a rock.Women don't need brutes to protect them, a incel programmer with a gun in his pocket would serve her in life better than 10 of these chads.The men to advance humanity to what it is now were no chads, they would be incel just like us if they were to live today, but they did more notable thing than fuck some hole for the 50th time that year, they were the ones to be written in the history books, not the men foids drool about.
50 or so years ago most of us would be able to create a family and take care of it without the need for good looks or raw brute strength, humanity didn't rise by simply overpowering all our competition, we did it by using our brains, and during the last 2 centuries humanity experienced some of the most technological advancements ever.
Second, some women may say that they want to dating genetically superior men for the future of their children, but we all know that this is a lie.Women are whores, and they do retain the DNA of all men they have had sex with, which means by their late 30s or later when they maybe DO decide to settle down and have children, their genes are already polluted from riding the cock carousel during their most fertile years and getting knocked up by men of basically every race and making mixed monstrosities.They also tend to murder their children which is telling to how much they care about their motherhood in reality.
UNLESS THE MAN YOU DON'T WANT TO HAVE CHILDREN WITH IS A GROWTH-STUNTED DOWN-SYNDROME-RIDDEN SUBHUMAN, BORN WITH SEVERAL STDs YOU HAVE NO REASON NOT TO BREED WITH HIM.
"and the only men who find it problematic are those with nothing to offer to a woman"
In return for that, what do women have to offer to men other than their used up roast beef every couple of months?They are mentally weak and are prone to believe their emotions over basic human logic.They cannot do physical labor as they're physically weak as well, their bones are able to be snapped like twigs by the average man if he wished to do so.
Remember the earthquakes and subsequent floods in Haiti in 2011(I believe)?Guess what women were doing, that's right, they were whoring themselves out just for a loaf of bread daily, they clearly cannot function in the wild without men.
Third point, why does hypergamy only affect men and not women as well?
Seeing as how women aren't exempt from bad genes and not every female has perfect genes, which is what they believe they do and that the entire fate of their child being a incel or a succesful chad or not depends on the male is pretty hypocritical.Infact, I'd wager that most incels here ARE incels because of their mother's side of the genes, usually resulting in them being manlets.Women shouldn't be allowed to choose who to breed with as they will rather be in a relationship with a man who beats her but is more attractive than the man who would treat her with respect.
