MarquisDeSade
Mephistopheles
★★★★★
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2021
- Posts
- 15,859
So, by now you all have heard of female neoliberals or Marxists chant economic socialism for the last few decades, I'm about to tell you why it's all bullshit.
There's a few bullshit players in our story here but mostly we'll focus on the so called female economic or political socialists.
Women or females are basically hypergamous sexual capitalists meaning they're all about socially climbing up society in terms of maximizing their ability of pro-creating and reproducing with the top 20% of the male population. So riddle me this, how is a creature that is sexually capitalist suppose to support and facilitate economic socialism across all segments of society which presumably means all males within it? Protip: They can't and they won't, that's an impossibility.
Because the female biological psychology is sexually capitalist or hypergamous they've already written the bottom 80% of men off concerning sexual interaction, you're telling me these same creatures that does all of that wants to make the socio-economic playing field more equal or equitable for the same men they already sexually write off? Yeah, I'm going to call bullshit on all of that. Truth be told with the uterus already being sexually capitalist there is a sort of sexual eugenics always at play with the female reproductive biological psychology. In fact, the only way female's social or economic version of socialism could ever work would be to have the bottom 80℅ of men being sexually celibate permanently not seeking sex or reproductive opportunity anywhere, you would have to essentially destroy the bottom 80% of men's entire sexual drive and libido just to get the kind of feminist utopic economic vision of socialism they collectively have in mind. I mean, how can you have an economically socialist or communist system where human sexuality is in constant social competition and entirely capitalist based? A mind blowing paradox and contradiction if there ever was one.
What's interesting to note is that while many great writers have wrote hundreds of books or volumes on the economic social psychological motivations within society less than half have discussed the inclinations of human sexuality being the primary impetus of all social economic psychological interactions. In fact, I would argue that all theories regarding social economic psychological interactions within society without discussing human sexuality is meaningless or vague full of errors. How can you discuss human nature without discussing the very behavioral social component of it reproducing itself?
And since the primary component of female sexuality is capitalist or socially eugenics based, how can you create a socialist economic environment that includes social equity for all including the same men that are primarily cut off from the reproductive breeding gene pool? Again, quite the mental conundrum. Another reason economic socialism fails besides its rational inadequacies or logical failures is entirely because of human sexuality and while females are sexually eugenic or capitalist the top 20% of men don't want to change things either because for a long time in civilization's history they've enjoyed a sexual monopoly in having primary access to a majority of breeding age females and it is only logical to say they don't want to get rid of that primary sexual monopoly of theirs with women anytime soon.
Of course, concerning this modern neo-liberal guise of economic socialism, is it any surprise that it is one that is entirely feminine in nature? You'll always hear about women's rights, women's opportunities, and women's protections under law, but what is really interesting about this entirely feminine modern neo-liberal economic socialism you never hear anything about social equity for men especially the bottom 80℅ of the male general population, that my friends is no bug or error whatsoever, that's an intentional feature of its whole design.
There's a few bullshit players in our story here but mostly we'll focus on the so called female economic or political socialists.
Women or females are basically hypergamous sexual capitalists meaning they're all about socially climbing up society in terms of maximizing their ability of pro-creating and reproducing with the top 20% of the male population. So riddle me this, how is a creature that is sexually capitalist suppose to support and facilitate economic socialism across all segments of society which presumably means all males within it? Protip: They can't and they won't, that's an impossibility.
Because the female biological psychology is sexually capitalist or hypergamous they've already written the bottom 80% of men off concerning sexual interaction, you're telling me these same creatures that does all of that wants to make the socio-economic playing field more equal or equitable for the same men they already sexually write off? Yeah, I'm going to call bullshit on all of that. Truth be told with the uterus already being sexually capitalist there is a sort of sexual eugenics always at play with the female reproductive biological psychology. In fact, the only way female's social or economic version of socialism could ever work would be to have the bottom 80℅ of men being sexually celibate permanently not seeking sex or reproductive opportunity anywhere, you would have to essentially destroy the bottom 80% of men's entire sexual drive and libido just to get the kind of feminist utopic economic vision of socialism they collectively have in mind. I mean, how can you have an economically socialist or communist system where human sexuality is in constant social competition and entirely capitalist based? A mind blowing paradox and contradiction if there ever was one.
What's interesting to note is that while many great writers have wrote hundreds of books or volumes on the economic social psychological motivations within society less than half have discussed the inclinations of human sexuality being the primary impetus of all social economic psychological interactions. In fact, I would argue that all theories regarding social economic psychological interactions within society without discussing human sexuality is meaningless or vague full of errors. How can you discuss human nature without discussing the very behavioral social component of it reproducing itself?
And since the primary component of female sexuality is capitalist or socially eugenics based, how can you create a socialist economic environment that includes social equity for all including the same men that are primarily cut off from the reproductive breeding gene pool? Again, quite the mental conundrum. Another reason economic socialism fails besides its rational inadequacies or logical failures is entirely because of human sexuality and while females are sexually eugenic or capitalist the top 20% of men don't want to change things either because for a long time in civilization's history they've enjoyed a sexual monopoly in having primary access to a majority of breeding age females and it is only logical to say they don't want to get rid of that primary sexual monopoly of theirs with women anytime soon.
Of course, concerning this modern neo-liberal guise of economic socialism, is it any surprise that it is one that is entirely feminine in nature? You'll always hear about women's rights, women's opportunities, and women's protections under law, but what is really interesting about this entirely feminine modern neo-liberal economic socialism you never hear anything about social equity for men especially the bottom 80℅ of the male general population, that my friends is no bug or error whatsoever, that's an intentional feature of its whole design.
Last edited: