Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Why fair skinned pajeets are delusional

Yeah, it shows they have been shifted

If they actually were close, they'd be closer than an Irishman ffs

Ofc

Therefore, the closest direct modern descendants, who are closest to it, are modern Europeans

And those descendants are diluted & lost most cultural elements of it
i feel like our disagreement is a semantical issue. you equate aryan to whoever is related to PII. I equate aryans to PII and cultures originating from it, such as iran or northern india, as those actually use that word. Can i ask you what cultural elements the modern german has from PIE? tbh hindus have about 10 times more indo european cultural legacy as they still have some temples for the vedic deities in india... ofc you claimed jews created christcuckery to weaken rome, so idk
Ofc, I just dislike SJW-tier users
that much i agree with
 
i feel like our disagreement is a semantical issue. you equate aryan to whoever is related to PII. I equate aryans to PII and cultures originating from it, such as iran or northern india, as those actually use that word. Can i ask you what cultural elements the modern german has from PIE? tbh hindus have about 10 times more indo european cultural legacy as they still have some temples for the vedic deities in india... ofc you claimed jews created christcuckery to weaken rome, so idk

that much i agree with
The point is, the people who propagated the culture were White, the modern one isn't even a direct following or continuation, it's mixed with abo beliefs, and some of the closest people to the original group which are the origins of PII & all that.

And yes, Christianity is clearly Jewish in origin, idk how anyone can deny that
 
The point is, the people who propagated the culture were White, the modern one isn't even a direct following or continuation, it's mixed with abo beliefs, and some of the closest people to the original group which are the origins of PII & all that.

And yes, Christianity is clearly Jewish in origin, idk how anyone can deny that
jewish in origin - yes. nefecial to the roman jews - definitely no. Hindus stil lworship surya, the last europeans to worship Indo european gods were balts. its an unfortunate turn of event doe. also european pagan beliefs were obviousely influenced by outside groups too, especielly in greece and italy
 
jewish in origin - yes. nefecial to the roman jews - definitely no
I'll show what I have later

And my point was, the original Aryans were White and/or the closest modern population is Whites. Therefore, Whites can utilize the term
 
I'll show what I have later

And my point was, the original Aryans were White and/or the closest modern population is Whites. Therefore, Whites can utilize the term
Feel free to show me your arguements in regard to the benefist chrsitianity had to the j0000000z. I will just add (and this is to have a comparsion) that what you are saying is akin to this "the original babylonians were near eastern. among closest modern populations are kurds, iraqi jews and assyrians. therefore all these 3 groups can utilize the term".
 
Feel free to show me your arguements in regard to the benefist chrsitianity had to the j0000000z.
Sure, I will in the other thread

Sorry for the fact that Judaism is responsible for a lot of issues, I genuinely cannot believe we have JQ deniers here
I will just add (and this is to have a comparsion) that what you are saying is akin to this "the original babylonians were near eastern. among closest modern populations are kurds, iraqi jews and assyrians. therefore all these 3 groups can utilize the term".
No, it doesn't work like that
 
Sure, I will in the other thread

Sorry for the fact that Judaism is responsible for a lot of issues, I genuinely cannot believe we have JQ deniers here
the talmud says bad things about pagans, it says even worse things about christians. I deny it bec very simply, its nonsense, especielly with christianity, which became very antisemitic very quickly
No, it doesn't work like that
If only i could understand why
 
the talmud says bad things about pagans, it says even worse things about christians. I deny it bec very simply, its nonsense, especielly with christianity, which became very antisemitic very quickly
It's controlled opposition, simple as that

Not hard to see why
If only i could understand why
Dude, it's simple

-The propagators of the term were White
-Modern White populations are the closest
-Hence, we have a right to use this
 
It's controlled opposition, simple as that
how is it effective, if the aforementioned opposition takes away the rather ocassionally privelaged rights jews had in the roman empire, gives a rleigious basis for hating them, makes them seperate from any class and army administration (jews served in positions in places like alexandria, and to my suprise diaspora jews served in the roman army oftne - non of that afterwards).
Not hard to see why

Dude, it's simple

-The propagators of the term were White
-Modern White populations are the closest
-Hence, we have a right to use this
than i can call myself canaanite, babylonian, phoenician, etc.
 
It's controlled opposition, simple as that
lest your pure minds should appear to share in the customs of a people so utterly depraved. ... Therefore, this irregularity must be corrected, in order that we may no more have any thing in common with those parricides and the murderers of our Lord. ... no single point in common with the perjury of the Jews."
- constantine the faggot
truly controlled opossition
 
Nah, not really I'd say
and why? if it is bec i am half russian jew, than maybe. my dad however, has a full right to do it - genetic studies prove it
 
and why? if it is bec i am half russian jew, than maybe. my dad however, has a full right to do it - genetic studies prove it
That's what I kinda meant yes, and you were just running in circles with your arguing there jfl

Aryan is a term originally invented & used by White people, though ofc using European makes more sense in the modern day & age

I just say it is ours, because of Pajeet copers such as @anandkonda
 
That's what I kinda meant yes, and you were just running in circles with your arguing there jfl

Aryan is a term originally invented & used by White people, though ofc using European makes more sense in the modern day & age

I just say it is ours, because of Pajeet copers such as @anandkonda
1000089246

I was gonna write another arguement but you know ehat just fuck my life man kek
 
View attachment 1325563
I was gonna write another arguement but you know ehat just fuck my life man kek
jfl

The point is, the ones who utilized the term "Aryan" to begin with were of PIE origins, were White/Whitish in genetics & appearance, meaning that it is a "White" term despite what @anandkonda says

Though I do personally think using "European" is better as a racial term, or even "Hyperborean" if we want to be hyperbolic/metaphorical
 
jfl

The point is, the ones who utilized the term "Aryan" to begin with were of PIE origins, were White/Whitish in genetics & appearance, meaning that it is a "White" term despite what @anandkonda says

Though I do personally think using "European" is better as a racial term, or even "Hyperborean" if we want to be hyperbolic/metaphorical
You see, i just view aryan as an ethno-cultural term mostly employed by the eastern branches of indo europeans. European is the best descriptor for white people, like you said. Hyoerborean connotes retarded tiktok edits.
 
You see, i just view aryan as an ethno-cultural term mostly employed by the eastern branches of indo europeans.
Well, it was originated by Whites
European is the best descriptor for white people, like you said
Agreed
. Hyoerborean connotes retarded tiktok edits.
Hyperborean is just hyperbolic/metaphorical
Most people are mixed race anyway
What a facetious statement
 
Aryan is a term originally invented & used by White people,
Yes, whites who were the ancestors of Indo-Iranian. Not modern Europeans
I just say it is ours, because of Pajeet copers such as @
anandkonda
@anandkonda
Bro, you said muh Aryan has a genetic basis to it and not cultural. And I'm the "Pajeet coper" here? :feelskek: First make an argument for that.
meaning that it is a "White" term despite what
Okay it's white term. Even fucking black Sri Lankans called themselves Aryan.

When did ancestors of Swedish, German or British ever EVER call themselves that? If it's supposed to be white term, which European White's ancestors ever call themselves that?

The whole fucking reason why Aryan word was even chosen was because it was misattributed to whole of Proto-Indo-European instead of just Proto-Indo-Iranian. You should also just correct that mistake like modern academics did now

@joocel52
 
Last edited:
I will just add (and this is to have a comparsion) that what you are saying is akin to this "the original babylonians were near eastern. among closest modern populations are kurds, iraqi jews and assyrians. therefore all these 3 groups can utilize the term".
Exactly :lul:
 
Slavs are Europeans jfl

Meanwhile reality:


View attachment 1324953

Albanians are Turkrapebaby scum, but better than a Jeet

Ofc he's a Dravidian
no they aren't . its like Hrithink roshan claiming to be white. Only few in the picture are romans rest of the germanics or white mfs who came to Rome.
 
All that I have to say is: I am an ethinic with light skin.

I also am afraid of niggers.

White women hate me.
They hate you because you're not a white Nordic Chad or a Tyrone with BBC.
 
I mean look at them. They look middle eastern. The blonde haired ones aren't even native. Northern and Southern Italians are almost similar in appearance. The light ones like Georgia meloni is not even native. These mfs must have taken some Vikings back then. Just my observation no proof.
 
Yes, whites who were the ancestors of Indo-Iranian. Not modern Europeans

Bro, you said muh Aryan has a genetic basis to it and not cultural. And I'm the "Pajeet coper" here? :feelskek: First make an argument for that.

Okay it's white term. Even fucking black Sri Lankans called themselves Aryan.

When did ancestors of Swedish, German or British ever EVER call themselves that? If it's supposed to be white term, which European White's ancestors ever call themselves that?

The whole fucking reason why Aryan word was even chosen was because it was misattributed to whole of Proto-Indo-European instead of just Proto-Indo-Iranian. You should also just correct that mistake like modern academics did now

@joocel52
My brothER, he wont ever admit it but the nordicists only use aryan bec daddy hitler used it. The obsses over a failed state that lasted and lost a single war. The issue here is semantics but like i showed with the babylonian example it is dishonest
 
Well, it was originated by Whites
It seems you consider race far mar important than culture. That is not suprising given your views. Thats just not the way historical cultures worked though
 
My brothER, he wont ever admit it but the nordicists only use aryan bec daddy hitler used it. The obsses over a failed state that lasted and lost a single war. The issue here is semantics but like i showed with the babylonian example it is dishonest
True
 

Similar threads

tandoorichickencel
Replies
16
Views
479
turbocuckcel_7000
turbocuckcel_7000
B
Replies
15
Views
413
HeinzKell
HeinzKell
tandoorichickencel
Replies
26
Views
1K
tari147
tari147
E
Replies
31
Views
492
Diddy
Diddy

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top