Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Why fair skinned pajeets are delusional

Because they didn't decend from Proto-Indo-Iranians
True, thats the deifnition of aryan, as only iranian and indo aryan people used that term historically. Ofc copers are gonna cope now
 
True, thats the deifnition of aryan, as only iranian and indo aryan people used that term historically. Ofc copers are gonna cope now
No

Aryan has roots in the Steppe/Yamnaya culture, therefore it applies to Europeans as well.
 
No

Aryan has roots in the Steppe/Yamnaya culture, therefore it applies to Europeans as well.
to my knowledge, while ofc the etymology of "aryan" is indo european and originates from the yamnaya culture, it was only used as an ethnonym by the indo-iranians. to my knowledge, no slav, greek etc ever used that term to describe their own ethnic group. it developed in the eastward migrations
 
Correct

Dude, I explained

The word Aryan has roots in the Steppe/Yamnaya, and therefore it has connotations to Europeans
Proto-Indo-Iranians =/= Proto-Indo-European
 
Tbh east europeans have as much an inferiority complex as some indians, nonsense like "slavo-aryans" while the actual nazis viewed them as subhumans kek
Slavs are Aryans/White

And dude, I really can't bring myself to believe what people say about the Nazis & holocaust/genocide, theres plenty of reasons to be suspicious of it
Both Russian and German are Aryan
Correct
Only Russians are
Hypocritical statement, since if Germans aren't "Aryan" neither are Russians, since you said only a specific group used it.
Kek some nordicist would react to this with "its bekoz they were barbaric mongolian horde unlike civilized germans:soy::soy::soy:" but yea they btfo germany completely
Who cares? Real Aryan Russians raped Muh Aryan Germans in WW2. Slavs mogg
Dude, Germany fought a two front war

Also, a lot of the Soviet army wasn't even Russian or Slavic

What a facetious statement
 
Slavs are Aryans/White

And dude, I really can't bring myself to believe what people say about the Nazis & holocaust/genocide, theres plenty of reasons to be suspicious of it

Correct

Hypocritical statement, since if Germans aren't "Aryan" neither are Russians, since you said only a specific group used it.


Dude, Germany fought a two front war

Also, a lot of the Soviet army wasn't even Russian or Slavic

What a facetious statement
A. theres plenty of historical evidence showing nazi officials viewed slavs as subhuman, even if a full scale genocide of them was never done. And in regards to the holocaust i truly have nothing to comment. I have nothing against you personally man, you seem like a nice guy, but this historical revisionism is nonsense. In regards to aryans - like i said neither german nor russians are aryans, literally only iranians and northern indians kek.
I am well aware nazi germany was fighting a two front war, but i do think most of the victory comes down to the ussr and not west. also nazis gettign defeated by armenians georgians and tuvans somehow make their claims of racial supeirority even dumber
 
Hypocritical statement, since if Germans aren't "Aryan" neither are Russians, since you said only a specific group used it.
Proto-Indo-Iranians (Aryan) homeland was literally in Russia

Also, a lot of the Soviet army wasn't even Russian or Slavic
I know they were Central Asian. Central Asians used to be Iranian (Aryan) before Turkic expansion.

So basically both Russians and Central Asians are more Aryan than Germans
Dude, Germany fought a two front war
Still Russians mogged


@joocel52
 
Proto-Indo-Iranians (Aryan) homeland was literally in Russia


I know they were Central Asian. Central Asians used to be Iranian (Aryan) before Turkic expansion.

So basically both Russians and Central Asians are more Aryan than Germans

Still Russians mogged


@joocel52
brocel, that is all historically true. tajikistan and afghanistan are still aryan, and the pamiri people are an especielly ancient sort of iranians - and yamanya culture is a bit more the west though like ukriane. genetically russians and central asians ahve a lot of iranian blood due to scythians and such - but again culturally the slavs and turkic people ahve not used aryan as an ethnonym
 
but again culturally the slavs and turkic people ahve not used aryan as an ethnonym
True, but their ancestors might have.

And idk what's with this Aryan coping. Aryans didn't even have a superior culture jfl
 
True, but their ancestors might have.

And idk what's with this Aryan coping. Aryans didn't even have a superior culture jfl
its all bec of daddy hitler. the closest thing to aryan "culture" today is either the kalash in pakistan or some turkic tribe in siberia, but i dont see the nazicels here obsessing with them kek
 
lot of the Soviet army wasn't even Russian or Slavic
:feelsseriously:
1732029282307


1732029331120







1732029116956
1732029125452
 

Attachments

  • 1732029302432.png
    1732029302432.png
    26.6 KB · Views: 10
Last edited:
The ones that raped Germans were Central Asians
could be, but saying that most of Soviet army weren't russian/ukranian/belarus, cmon. This is why all of these kavkaz and central asians spit and piss onto memorials.
 
Proto-Indo-Iranians =/= Proto-Indo-European
Well, without the PIE, PII wouldn't have existed
to my knowledge, while ofc the etymology of "aryan" is indo european and originates from the yamnaya culture, it was only used as an ethnonym by the indo-iranians. to my knowledge, no slav, greek etc ever used that term to describe their own ethnic group. it developed in the eastward migrations
Doesn't matter, because of the roots of it are Yamnaya/Aryan
brocel, that is all historically true. tajikistan and afghanistan are still aryan, and the pamiri people are an especielly ancient sort of iranians - and yamanya culture is a bit more the west though like ukriane. genetically russians and central asians ahve a lot of iranian blood due to scythians and such - but again culturally the slavs and turkic people ahve not used aryan as an ethnonym
No it's not jfl

Afghanistan & those regions are not "muh aryan"
A. theres plenty of historical evidence showing nazi officials viewed slavs as subhuman, even if a full scale genocide of them was never done. And in regards to the holocaust i truly have nothing to comment. I have nothing against you personally man, you seem like a nice guy, but this historical revisionism is nonsense. In regards to aryans - like i said neither german nor russians are aryans, literally only iranians and northern indians kek.
I am well aware nazi germany was fighting a two front war, but i do think most of the victory comes down to the ussr and not west. also nazis gettign defeated by armenians georgians and tuvans somehow make their claims of racial supeirority even dumber
Dude, imagine thinking it did happen on here of all spaces jfl

Theres plenty of evidence to believe the numbers were at least fraud to some degree
Proto-Indo-Iranians (Aryan) homeland was literally in Russia
Because they broke off from the Yamnaya
I know they were Central Asian. Central Asians used to be Iranian (Aryan) before Turkic expansion.

So basically both Russians and Central Asians are more Aryan than Germans
Central Asians are not, they got turned into HAPAs by mixing, it's called history buddy read it
its all bec of daddy hitler. the closest thing to aryan "culture" today is either the kalash in pakistan or some turkic tribe in siberia, but i dont see the nazicels here obsessing with them kek
Aryans dont exist anymore buddy, therefore they are not "Aryan" at all
 
Well, without the PIE, PII wouldn't have existed
Without apes humans wouldn't have existed. Now chimps are humans?

That's exactly your logic btw :feelsseriously:
 
Well, without the PIE, PII wouldn't have existed

Doesn't matter, because of the roots of it are Yamnaya/Aryan
arabs are not akkadian right? both are semetic but one is arab and one is akkadian, bec they have diffrenet ethnonyms and languages despite shared origin.
Afghanistan & those regions are not "muh aryan"
no arguement here on your behalf, the only arguement ebing your dislike of them.
Dude, imagine thinking it did happen on here of all spaces jfl

Theres plenty of evidence to believe the numbers were at least fraud to some degree
imagine beliving in national socialism. this site is a place for incels - i am an incel. that the numbers are overrated i might accept, but that its a fraud - no. again implying anyone who isnt a naitonal socialist is some kinda leftist soyboy...
Because they broke off from the Yamnaya

Central Asians are not, they got turned into HAPAs by mixing, it's called history buddy read it
tajiks, pamiris, the various sort of afghans...
Aryans dont exist anymore buddy, therefore they are not "Aryan" at all

i said "closest thing".
 
Central Asians are not, they got turned into HAPAs by mixing, it's called history buddy read it
Tajiks are still Iranian. Rest of them aren't though, but their ancestors were Iranian. Aryan is a cultural marker

Aryans dont exist anymore buddy, therefore they are not "Aryan" at all
Indo-Iranian are Aryans. They do even today. Proto-Indo-Iranians don't exist not Indo-Iranian

 
Without apes humans wouldn't have existed. Now chimps are humans?

That's exactly your logic btw :feelsseriously:
Tangent, and irrelevant

This is about language & culture

FYI, also look at who is the closest to Yamnaya/Steppe distance wise:

1727546859877


@joocel52

Smallest number=closest to Whites
 
Tangent, and irrelevant

This is about language & culture

FYI, also look at who is the closest to Yamnaya/Steppe distance wise:

View attachment 1325351

@joocel52

Smallest number=closest to Whites
Hans Chinese would have been closer to Proto-Turks than Anatolians. Now are Hans Chinese Turks?

Proto-Indo-Iranians were genetically white, true. But modern Europeans aren't descendants of them.
 
Tangent, and irrelevant

This is about language & culture

FYI, also look at who is the closest to Yamnaya/Steppe distance wise:

View attachment 1325351

@joocel52

Smallest number=closest to Whites
never claimed that iranians or north indians are pure yamanaya, merely that they are the only groups to use the word aryan, and thus they are aryan. in regards to this chart, i agree with it - it seems that specifically in norhtern europe the native population was small and undeveloped, so yamnaya ancestry is more singificant. doesnt change the fact that they never used the title aryan, which is an ehtnonym of indo-iranian peoples alone. ALSO TAJIKS STILL ARE SUPER CLOSE
 
could be, but saying that most of Soviet army weren't russian/ukranian/belarus, cmon. This is why all of these kavkaz and central asians spit and piss onto memorials.
I see
 
Tajiks are still Iranian. Rest of them aren't though, but their ancestors were Iranian. Aryan is a cultural marker
No, it also has a genetic basis to it somewhat
arabs are not akkadian right? both are semetic but one is arab and one is akkadian, bec they have diffrenet ethnonyms and languages despite shared origin.
Tangent
no arguement here on your behalf, the only arguement ebing your dislike of them.
No? I was just potting out how it was an inaccurate statement, since culturally & genetically they are quite different

You're just using a typical Redditor arguing manner here
imagine beliving in national socialism. this site is a place for incels - i am an incel.
How is this relevant? Inceldom is a monolith, and we have people here of all views & beliefs

I'm not even a full NS, I just agree with certain principles of it.

Also this is ad hom
that the numbers are overrated i might accept, but that its a fraud - no.
It was very overstated, actual numbers were likely around 230k
 
No, it also has a genetic basis to it somewhat
i doubt that the scythians and king cyrus knew about genetics - it was a cultural and ethnic title
how so?
No? I was just potting out how it was an inaccurate statement, since culturally & genetically they are quite different

You're just using a typical Redditor arguing manner here
i will clarify what i mean - the afghans are descended from people who actually called themselves aryans, unlike lets say germans or irish people.
How is this relevant? Inceldom is a monolith, and we have people here of all views & beliefs

I'm not even a full NS, I just agree with certain principles of it.
than i have a full right to disagree with it completely, you seemed to imply me disagreeing is a proof im some soboy ot smthing
Also this is ad hom

It was very overstated, actual numbers were likely around 230k
again, i dont wanna argur about that man, but ill just say that i often feel like even if youd know its six million youd still not mind, bec people who have naitonal socialist views dont tend to view jews in any sympathy
 
its all bec of daddy hitler. the closest thing to aryan "culture" today is either the kalash in pakistan or some turkic tribe in siberia, but i dont see the nazicels here obsessing with them kek
Maybe they'll stop if they learn Aryans had cow piss drinking and bathing rituals along with their heavy cow veneration culture :feelskek:
 
Maybe they'll stop if they learn Aryans had cow piss drinking and bathing rituals along with their heavy cow veneration culture :feelskek:
:lul: Lmfao man. OG aryans were literally steppe niggers like kazakhs, at least when they settle in india they made some cool buildings along with the aforementiomed cow piss rituals kek
 
:lul: Lmfao man. OG aryans were literally steppe niggers like kazakhs, at least when they settle in india they made some cool buildings along with the aforementiomed cow piss rituals kek
The only reason they are even trying to claim muh Aryan is because of initial misattribution of it entire Proto-Indo-European instead of just Proto-Indo-Iranian.

Buddhists called themselves Aryan. 4 Noble Truths are literally called Arya Satya

Even blackest Sri Lankans did, but not a single European in history :feelskek:
 
i doubt that the scythians and king cyrus knew about genetics - it was a cultural and ethnic title
What I meant was this:

Indo-Europeans expanded into the region which is how PII exists

And ofc, the closest linked groups to these, based on genetic distance & haplogroups are modern Europeans:

Image 5


Image 6


And for the Scythians:

BVfCLBB



View: https://x.com/nrken19/status/1558455262264152064

It was off topic & not related
i will clarify what i mean - the afghans are descended from people who actually called themselves aryans, unlike lets say germans or irish people.
Well, Afghans have been diluted genetically from that original population, whereas Irish & Germans are direct descendants from a group which
than i have a full right to disagree with it completely, you seemed to imply me disagreeing is a proof im some soboy ot smthing
Ofc you do
again, i dont wanna argur about that man, but ill just say that i often feel like even if youd know its six million youd still not mind, bec people who have naitonal socialist views dont tend to view jews in any sympathy
Because most of them don't deserve it jfl
:lul: Lmfao man. OG aryans were literally steppe niggers like kazakhs, at least when they settle in india they made some cool buildings along with the aforementiomed cow piss rituals kek
Dude, like I said modern Kazakhs are genetically drifted, it's common fact
 
:lul: Lmfao man. OG aryans were literally steppe niggers like kazakhs, at least when they settle in india they made some cool buildings along with the aforementiomed cow piss rituals kek
ALSO TAJIKS STILL ARE SUPER CLOSE
Modern Central Asians have nothing to do with the original inhabitants of the region:


mtDNA of ancient central Asians​

An interesting new paper confirms the anthropological and archaeological picture of a westward spread of Caucasoids in Central Asia in early prehistoric times, followed by the spread of Mongoloids in the opposite direction during the 1st millennium BC. The Caucasoid-Mongoloid hybrid population resulting from these interactions is similar in terms of mtDNA with present-day Central Asians with some noted differences (e.g., presence of additional West Eurasian haplogroups). In the ancient samples, West Eurasian haplogroups H, HV, I, T*, T1, U*, U1, U5, U5a1 and W were represented:
  • HV sequences have matches in the Central Mediterranean region
  • H sequences are split between the common Cambridge Reference Sequence (CRS) found in many populations, and two other sequences found in the Central Mediterranean and the Caucasus
  • The I sequence is present in a modern Central Asian and also in individuals from the Caucasus
  • The W sequence is widespread in West Eurasia
  • T* sequences are widespread in Europe, the Near East and the Central Mediterranean region
  • T1 is widespread in West Eurasia, but also found sporadically in East Eurasia
  • The U1a sequences are found in Turks, Armenians and Caucasians
  • The U5a sequence has been found in an Egyptian
  • The U5a1 sequence is frequent in the Caucasus and present in Europe, while a different U5a1 was reported previously in Mongolia
The East Eurasian haplogroups belong to A*, M*, M4 and G2:
  • The M* sequence was observed in an Indian individual
  • The M4 sequence has not been previously reported
  • The G2 sequence is found in present-day China and Central Asia
  • One A sequence is found in present-day Central Asians and Indians, while the other two have a motif found in a modern Chukchi
Most (78%) of the sequences are of West Eurasian (Caucasoid) origin, but before the 7th c. BC, East Eurasian (Mongoloid) sequences are absent, although they could be present up to 20.6% (p<0.05).
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 May 7;271(1542):941-7.

Unravelling migrations in the steppe: mitochondrial DNA sequences from ancient central Asians.

Lalueza-Fox C et al.

This study helps to clarify the debate on the Western and Eastern genetic influences in Central Asia. Thirty-six skeletal remains from Kazakhstan (Central Asia), excavated from different sites dating between the fifteenth century BC to the fifth century AD, have been analysed for the hypervariable control region (HVR-I) and haplogroup diagnostic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the mitochondrial DNA genome. Standard authentication criteria for ancient DNA studies, including multiple extractions, cloning of PCR products and independent replication, have been followed. The distribution of east and west Eurasian lineages through time in the region is concordant with the available archaeological information: prior to the thirteenth-seventh century BC, all Kazakh samples belong to European lineages; while later an arrival of east Eurasian sequences that coexisted with the previous west Eurasian genetic substratum can be detected. The presence of an ancient genetic substratum of European origin in West Asia may be related to the discovery of ancient mummies with European features in Xinjiang and to the existence of an extinct Indo-European language, Tocharian. This study demonstrates the usefulness of the ancient DNA in unravelling complex patterns of past human migrations so as to help decipher the origin of present-day admixed populations.

Like I said, they're genetically shifted from the original inhabitants
 
What I meant was this:

Indo-Europeans expanded into the region which is how PII exists

And ofc, the closest linked groups to these, based on genetic distance & haplogroups are modern Europeans:

View attachment 1325376

View attachment 1325377

And for the Scythians:

View attachment 1325379


View: https://x.com/nrken19/status/1558455262264152064

never denied yamnaya and pii are european looking - but merely again, that only pii and groups derived from them are known to call themselves aryans, and that the genetic similarity between pii and europeans is bec europeans are descended from yamnaya culture, albeit western migrations and arent as mixed as indians and central aisans.
It was off topic & not related
i have given it as an example to clarify why we cant call all indo european people aryans, just like we cant call all semites arabs.
Well, Afghans have been diluted genetically from that original population, whereas Irish & Germans are direct descendants from a group which
they are both descended from PIE but diffrenet branches, and the diluted afghans, unlike irishmen, are of the branch that once reffered to itself as aryan.
Ofc you do
thanks! free speech on this site is important as its one of the only places where we can express our suffering and thoughts openly
Because most of them don't deserve it jfl
:feelsseriously:
Dude, like I said modern Kazakhs are genetically drifted, it's common fact
agreed - but they are diluted forms of PII, something germans arent. also i meant more that their traditional lifestyle is far more similar to pre indo europeans than nay modern european is
 
look at that chart you sent bro
Yeah, it shows they have been shifted

If they actually were close, they'd be closer than an Irishman ffs
never denied yamnaya and pii are european looking - but merely again, that only pii and groups derived from them are known to call themselves aryans, and that the genetic similarity between pii and europeans is bec europeans are descended from yamnaya culture, albeit western migrations and arent as mixed as indians and central aisans.
Ofc

Therefore, the closest direct modern descendants, who are closest to it, are modern Europeans
they are both descended from PIE but diffrenet branches, and the diluted afghans, unlike irishmen, are of the branch that once reffered to itself as aryan.
And those descendants are diluted & lost most cultural elements of it
thanks! free speech on this site is important as its one of the only places where we can express our suffering and thoughts openly
Ofc, I just dislike SJW-tier users
 

Similar threads

tandoorichickencel
Replies
24
Views
497
DarkStar
DarkStar
E
Replies
31
Views
361
Diddy
Diddy

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top