Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Why does soyciety say that men have it better now in some aspects

Kamanbert

Kamanbert

Wizcelled
★★
Joined
Apr 13, 2024
Posts
4,130
Personaly i dont feel like it's true at all. We are supposedly freer to be this or that, not having to adapt to those horrible narrow "patriarcal norms" but this is just the theory progressive morons pull out of their asses cause in practice, through a set of factors they completely ignore (factors not necessarily tied to feminism but no less important) the world never was the caricature they make it out to be.

1000014644

1000014645


The fact that this chubby, homely looking guy also known for his eating and drinking habits (Babe Ruth) was a revered national hero in the domain of sports of all things really says a lot.

According to progressives and their distorted worldview, the epitome of patriarchy/toxic masculinity would be some assholish gym dudebro checking out his muscles in the mirror and yet the biggest athletic icon for men throughout the still "patriarchal" USA was some guy that could've been a poster child for today's fat acceptance. The biggest irony being that many women would now reject this guy for being out of shape.

There was no other time in history where men were expected to perform as they are now — physically, emotionally, profesionally, socially — to the point of abject sadism. What the fuck are those progressives talking about ?

One thing progressives love to do is taking things at face-value, ie blaming patriarchy as a vector of social norms and rules, but ignoring or omitting on purpose that those norms and rules could be navigated with much more grace than modern injunctions, a grace that progressives neo-liberal and postmodern psychosocial wiring is completely bereft of ; more often than not they're actually more authoritarian and inhumane than any norm-controlling society of the past, because those societies had the merit of making their intentions clear and their goals were, in the end, prosocial, unlike the current war of all against all in the name of total "liberty".
 
Last edited:
I think this "relief from patriarchal norms" only applies to trannies and faggots. We all know that heterosexual men are still expected to be this or that, but under a much more external/sadistic scrutiny.
 
"The patriarchy hurts men" is the trojan horse they use to push feminism and progressivism. Progressivism and feminism largely benefit women. For example, women are the primary group that benefit from dei and affirmative action.

They don't a shit about men. It's only when men start leaning right that they start trying to push this narrative that feminism and progressivism are good for men too.
 
I think this "relief from patriarchal norms" only applies to trannies and faggots. We all know that heterosexual men are still expected to be this or that, but under a much more external/sadistic scrutiny.
The progressives telling you about how toxic masculinity prevents men from sharing their feelings will mock men venting about not being able to get a girlfriend. :feelskek:

You're right. You're only allowed to be vulnerable when you're a literal faggot who isn't seen as sexual competition or a threat.
 
"The patriarchy hurts men" is the trojan horse they use to push feminism and progressivism. Progressivism and feminism largely benefit women. For example, women are the primary group that benefit from dei and affirmative action.

They don't a shit about men. It's only when men start leaning right that they start trying to push this narrative that feminism and progressivism are good for men too.
:yes: I hate this cliche bullshit mantra
 
The progressives telling you about how toxic masculinity prevents men from sharing their feelings will mock men venting about not being able to get a girlfriend. :feelskek:

You're right. You're only allowed to be vulnerable when you're a literal faggot who isn't seen as sexual competition or a threat.
I've been thrown to the wolves by progressive foids (i assume cause they were students from a liberal uni) in public for showing sensitivity when i was feeling down in the dumps.

I also remember my feminist cousin calling a man a bitch for being emotional on tv (he had lost some cooking contest). My feminist sister also wouldn't hesitate to act like that. It's just all so full of shit. Feminism = sadism.

I agree, this "being emotionaly vulnerable" bullshit only applies to fags or in specific situations. Like doing so when the right spotlights are there. This soyciety is so fake and evil.
 
Last edited:
I've been thrown to the wolves by progressive foids (i assume cause they were students from a liberal uni) in public for showing sensitivity when i was feeling down in the dumps.

I also remember my feminist cousin calling a man a bitch for being emotional on tv (he had lost some cooking contest). My feminist sister also wouldn't hesitate to act like that. It's just all so full of shit. Feminism = sadism.
They only care about themselves and the social validation they can get from virtue signaling for faggots and other creatures. Actions speak louder than words. If they were actually genuinely concerned with peoples well-being then they would extend that care towards people they're not directly told to care about by the media and "influencers."

"I also remember my feminist cousin calling a man a bitch for being emotional on tv (he had lost some cooking contest). My feminist sister also wouldn't hesitate to act like that. It's just all so full of shit. Feminism = sadism."
It's amazing the sheer disdain women hold towards emotional sub attractive men.
 
They only care about themselves and the social validation they can get from virtue signaling for faggots and other creatures. Actions speak louder than words. If they were actually genuinely concerned with peoples well-being then they would extend that care towards people they're not directly told to care about by the media and "influencers."

"I also remember my feminist cousin calling a man a bitch for being emotional on tv (he had lost some cooking contest). My feminist sister also wouldn't hesitate to act like that. It's just all so full of shit. Feminism = sadism."
It's amazing the sheer disdain women hold towards emotional sub attractive men.

:yes::yes::yes: Everything is so upside down. I have to ignore it somehow. I could muster the deserved hate during my 20's but now pushing 32 i'm just too weak for it :feelskek:
 

Similar threads

Clavicus Vile
Replies
26
Views
592
ndltn
ndltn
LonelyATM
Replies
8
Views
538
Gaelic-Truecel
Gaelic-Truecel
RealSchizo
Replies
1
Views
439
BricABrac
BricABrac
RobertGarnicasAPedo
Replies
6
Views
407
INVERTER
INVERTER
AutismKing
Replies
18
Views
871
Anonymoutron
A

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top