Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Why does Israel let China own its national industries?

AsiaCel

AsiaCel

shalom goyim
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Posts
30,216
Online time
1d 32m
Geopolitically that doesn't make sense.

2/6 ports built by Chinese, one in operational control by Chinese


Largest food company (milk producer) under Chinese majority ownership


A line constructed by China


One of largest agricultural chemical


"Quiet takeover" of critical infrastructure


There's more companies majority owned or minority owned by Chinese investors.
 
Last edited:
niggas almost got their national insurance company bought out, only the laws stopped it lmao
 
As if they print there own money or own there own stocks...
 
Peter Liberman in his book Does Conquest Pay? The exploitation of occupied industrial societies

Shows how modern, economically developed nation states can compel economic collaboration of foreign companies with sizeable domestic assets in the Industrial and post industrial age through control of centralized financial and administrative institutions backed by the implicit threat of force

Fundamentally, a sovereign nation state can be defined as
a political institution that controls a large territory with well defined borders and has the ability to employ force to break or discipline the individuals and groups living within those borders. Within these borders, in other words, the state has “exclusive supreme command, enabling it within this territory, to overrule the lower administrative echelons as well as disregard private property
By the Great Professor Mearsheimer

Basically, while Chinese companies might have microeconomic control at the firm level, the Israeli state is the "supreme sovereign" of the Israeli Nation, a la Carl Schmitt, with the ability to disregard and overrule private property laws and take back any political or economic authority they delegated, as supreme power inside a sovereign state rests exclusively in it

As Israel rules America (not the country directly, but it's rulers to paraphrase Ron Unz), they do not have to fear American retaliation from engaging with China economically either, so there are no external constraints to their political sovereignty

And they can always take back domestic economic assets owned by foreign companies in an emergency situation (breakdown of diplomatic relations up to war) either by way of confiscation or nationalization of assets like Nasser did in Egypt
 
Last edited:
Peter Liberman in his book Does Conquest Pay? The exploitation of occupied industrial societies

Shows how modern, economically developed nation states can compel economic collaboration of foreign companies with sizeable domestic assets in the Industrial and post industrial age through control of centralized financial and administrative institutions backed by the implicit threat of force

Fundamentally, a sovereign nation state can be defined as

By the Great Professor Mearsheimer

Basically, while Chinese companies might have microeconomic control at the firm level, the Israeli state is the "supreme sovereign" of the Israeli Nation, a la Carl Schmitt, with the ability to disregard and overrule private property laws and take back any political or economic authority they delegated, as supreme power inside a sovereign state rests exclusively in it

As Israel rules America (not the country directly, but it's rulers to paraphrase Ron Unz), they do not have to fear American retaliation from engaging with China economically either, so there are no external constraints to their political sovereignty

And they can always take back domestic economic assets owned by foreign companies in an emergency situation (breakdown of diplomatic relations up to war) either by way of confiscation or nationalization of assets like Nasser did in Egypt
Fair enough. Just like the situation in Netherlands when a Chinese owned company was seized.

I think most countries, if they want to, can seize foreign owned assets (assuming they have nukes or the cost to invade them is high) the guns are in their field after all, but it would take toll significantly in economic and political costs.

Also, is the situation of letting foreign countries own a company's stock, just inviting foreign capital?

How much better is foreign majority ownership VS foreign minority ownership?

Would you say the situation is same for foreign companies in China?

I am not very well versed in economy and business, so yeah.
 
Last edited:
Peter Liberman in his book Does Conquest Pay? The exploitation of occupied industrial societies

Shows how modern, economically developed nation states can compel economic collaboration of foreign companies with sizeable domestic assets in the Industrial and post industrial age through control of centralized financial and administrative institutions backed by the implicit threat of force

Fundamentally, a sovereign nation state can be defined as

By the Great Professor Mearsheimer

Basically, while Chinese companies might have microeconomic control at the firm level, the Israeli state is the "supreme sovereign" of the Israeli Nation, a la Carl Schmitt, with the ability to disregard and overrule private property laws and take back any political or economic authority they delegated, as supreme power inside a sovereign state rests exclusively in it

As Israel rules America (not the country directly, but it's rulers to paraphrase Ron Unz), they do not have to fear American retaliation from engaging with China economically either, so there are no external constraints to their political sovereignty

And they can always take back domestic economic assets owned by foreign companies in an emergency situation (breakdown of diplomatic relations up to war) either by way of confiscation or nationalization of assets like Nasser did in Egypt
I love Mershaimer's book on Israel and the US Foreign Lobby.
 
I love Mershaimer's book on Israel and the US Foreign Lobby.
Does it go into details about Jewish owned banks supporting Jewish supremacy programs? Because if you ignore the international banks and shit, the Jews seem way less powerful.
 
The Chinese government isn't in their pocket. Whatever the effort they can make to take control of these companies, the Chinese can take them back easily. Furthermore, China can move closer to the Muslim countries, which are already allies, and start supplying them more millitary equipment, instead of attacking Israel more directly.
 
The Chinese government isn't in their pocket. Whatever the effort they can make to take control of these companies, the Chinese can take them back easily. Furthermore, China can move closer to the Muslim countries, which are already allies, and start supplying them more millitary equipment, instead of attacking Israel more directly
play both sides of Israel and Palestine so they kill each other
 
play both sides of Israel and Palestine so they kill each other
They do it now, but if they have to make a choice I believe they'd pick Palestine because of other alliances in Middle East (Iran and Pakistan(nor really in Middle East, but close enough)). And they're better allies. USA does bends-over backwards to help Israel while the j00s seek to subjugate America.
 
They do it now, but if they have to make a choice I believe they'd pick Palestine because of other alliances in Middle East (Iran and Pakistan(nor really in Middle East, but close enough)). And they're better allies. USA does bends-over backwards to help Israel while the j00s seek to subjugate America.
To be honest, China has much more to gain from partnership with Israel over Palestine which does not produce much value....well they make natural soaps with their feet so if you're into that sort of thing, maybe they do.

Otherwise Israel serves as a way to get US technologies.
 
I think it’s because in return, the Israelis make a killing off of selling U.S technology and weaponry for the Chinese to make their own cheap copies of. And historically the Chinese and the Jews have always been chummy with one another, they even celebrate Christmas together. Your average chink is just a less creatively-minded kike.
 
Geopolitically that doesn't make sense.

2/6 ports built by Chinese, one in operational control by Chinese


Largest food company (milk producer) under Chinese majority ownership


A line constructed by China


One of largest agricultural chemical


"Quiet takeover" of critical infrastructure


There's more companies majority owned or minority owned by Chinese investors.
China is not an enemy of Israel. China did not even help the Arabs during the Six-Day War or the Yom Kippur War. The Maoists, like the New Left, did not hate Jews. In fact, most of the New Left's ideologues were Jewish.
 
To be honest, China has much more to gain from partnership with Israel over Palestine which does not produce much value....well they make natural soaps with their feet so if you're into that sort of thing, maybe they do.

Otherwise Israel serves as a way to get US technologies.
I just don't see it. Aside from getting US tech, nothing good will come from getting friendly with Israel. China is already good partners with enemies of Israel, has tech of its own now and has been pushing for peace which angered Israel. J00s also won't be able to infiltrate China the way they did USA
 
Peter Liberman in his book Does Conquest Pay? The exploitation of occupied industrial societies

Shows how modern, economically developed nation states can compel economic collaboration of foreign companies with sizeable domestic assets in the Industrial and post industrial age through control of centralized financial and administrative institutions backed by the implicit threat of force

Fundamentally, a sovereign nation state can be defined as

By the Great Professor Mearsheimer

Basically, while Chinese companies might have microeconomic control at the firm level, the Israeli state is the "supreme sovereign" of the Israeli Nation, a la Carl Schmitt, with the ability to disregard and overrule private property laws and take back any political or economic authority they delegated, as supreme power inside a sovereign state rests exclusively in it

As Israel rules America (not the country directly, but it's rulers to paraphrase Ron Unz), they do not have to fear American retaliation from engaging with China economically either, so there are no external constraints to their political sovereignty

And they can always take back domestic economic assets owned by foreign companies in an emergency situation (breakdown of diplomatic relations up to war) either by way of confiscation or nationalization of assets like Nasser did in Egypt
Banned
 

Similar threads

AsiaCel
Replies
35
Views
5K
Emba
Emba
DarkStar
Replies
80
Views
15K
Devoteecel
Devoteecel
E
Replies
35
Views
7K
Qech__
Qech__
Regenerator
Replies
62
Views
10K
ogercel
ogercel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top