Idk but rn I have a 99 overall average in my math class so lol
Serious Why do white people have a higher IQ than black people?
D
I think this "lunar" and "solar" thing can be seen when you compare Spinoza ideas with Kantian ones.
Keep in mind that i don't believe Jews are "evil" by nature. They are simply in a state of decadence and this decadence shows in a certain way that's different from Europeans, many of whom are also in a state of decadence but after a completely different fashion. For instance, Europeans seem to have a tendency towards rationalism and the kind of intellectual cul-de-sac represented by Cartesianism with Kant being the final stage, the solution to which, that offered by the existentialists and people like Nietzsche being worse than the disease in my opinion.
Basically, you can be decadent but in a "solar" way which explains what happened between the Renaissance and the Enlightenment, which was a reprise of the kind of "aryan" deviation the Greeks and Romans had sunk into, where as Jews seems to have brought back a kind of Babylonian decadence, which is a uniquely feminine kind of decadence.
Last edited:
I'm half black half white and my IQ is godlike, riddle me that
D
Bating. Anyway, why are a lot of Indians, Jews, Arabs, etc smart if the "Nordics are smarter because the stupid ones were justly punished for their laziness by starving and freezing in the winter and didn't pass on their genes" thing is correct?
Because it's not correct.
Caste determines what you are, not race. The ignorance regarding the existence of natural castes is one of the biggest problems with the way moderns are attempting to understand society and cultures.
The error of Nordicism is to conflate race with caste. Joseph Arthur de Gobineau, who is the father of Nordicism, was a nobleman who ascribed aristocratic traits to his own race, and the deficiencies of the peasantry were for him an indication the peasants belonged to a different race. Now anyone who has met a redneck knows that to have white or Nordic blood doesn't mean one ceases to be a peasant if that's their natural inclination, but that's the problem with this kind of thinking.
For the record, modern leftists make the same exact error except in their case they mistake race with class. If Nordicism is an aristocratic form of racism, leftists are engaging in a kind of Marxist racialism, so that to be "white" is to be privileged even if we are talking about some poor guy living in the streets or, more pertinently to this forum, a white incel.
Basically, the caste system of India wasn't just some arbitrary social structure but was created to conform to what they perceived to be a natural divisions among human beings. Some people are BORN to be thinkers, warriors or peasants. That's what people today don't get. Most ancient cultures did understand this however, and they build their societies to conform to this understanding. What happened though is that certain groups became identified with a specific caste because certain societies allowed certain castes to be locked to heredity. This was the case with India, and given the nature of heredity over time one gets the illusion caste and race went together.
This is the case for the Parsi for instance, who originally were a religious class but eventually transformed itself into an ethnic group. The same goes for the Jews, but notice how the moment the latter got a real country, suddenly from an ethnic identity that reflected the values associated with the religious and intellectual class of a society, the ethnic stock became more varied so that Isreal now has warriors and peasants and not just intellectuals like Jews in the west.
BTW, following what i just said, let me point out that one issue with blacks is that their social situation, their poverty and social dysfunction, tends to select in favor of "warrior" traits and against intellectual ones, not in the sense they changed as a race but that to thrive in the kind of environment they have created you have to be a soldier and not a thinker.
By this i don't mean there's misunderstood Einsteins hiding away in the homes of black families, since i specified black intellectuality differs from that of European intellectuallity (first being dynamic and vital, second being static and cerebral), but there are still contemplative black individuals who however are crushed and suppressed by an environment that selects mostly for fighting prowess.
Europeans too have something similar going on, since the excessive admiration European culture has for warrior values made sure anyone of a contemplative temperament gets shafted by society, even in the absence of any harsh economic conditions. To be a "man" in western society is to be a warrior. Thinkers are scorned and derided, where as with Jews the opposite is true which shows how certain traits in an ethnic group are brought to the fore without the necessity to assume the race itself has been altered.
Actually, to think of it, it's likely that the "warrior" ethos of blacks in America was inspired by the warrior ethos of white society back in the 19th century. Especially in the south it's likely blacks developed a kind of fighting and "honor" culture because that was the example whites provided them at the time.
By this i don't mean there's misunderstood Einsteins hiding away in the homes of black families, since i specified black intellectuality differs from that of European intellectuallity (first being dynamic and vital, second being static and cerebral), but there are still contemplative black individuals who however are crushed and suppressed by an environment that selects mostly for fighting prowess.
Europeans too have something similar going on, since the excessive admiration European culture has for warrior values made sure anyone of a contemplative temperament gets shafted by society, even in the absence of any harsh economic conditions. To be a "man" in western society is to be a warrior. Thinkers are scorned and derided, where as with Jews the opposite is true which shows how certain traits in an ethnic group are brought to the fore without the necessity to assume the race itself has been altered.
Actually, to think of it, it's likely that the "warrior" ethos of blacks in America was inspired by the warrior ethos of white society back in the 19th century. Especially in the south it's likely blacks developed a kind of fighting and "honor" culture because that was the example whites provided them at the time.
Last edited:
because colonisation and slavery 
R
Ecanomic freedom is correlated with iq would make sense if it was ecanomic freedom.
W
Evolution.
B
IQ has no effect on the propensity towards crime. That's a socio-economic status problem. There are high IQ criminals at the top of every food chain who never get caught, irrespective of ethnicity.
High IQ.
Last edited:
Also CIA bitches put lead in black people water too. Every black people area tends to have shitty water not coincidence
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
