im tired
RageFuel why do we engineer and analyze something natural that should take care of itself?
What is it we're engineering and analyzing?
Love should take care of itself? What does that mean?
because that's what rejects do
or if you aren't too fucked up, then it's because of people successfully running their strategy based on cliquey bullshit, it creates a literal wall that needs a counter-strategy so you can scale it and get in
or if you aren't too fucked up, then it's because of people successfully running their strategy based on cliquey bullshit, it creates a literal wall that needs a counter-strategy so you can scale it and get in
Other people can easily get into relationships while we can't even do the most basic shit.
Humans were never meant to be this self aware. We are meant to work ourselves into the ground and not have enough time to learn about the true nature of things. Incels are the true enlightened ones.
Things are not happening naturally for us because the rules of nature is survival of the fittest and we are not the fittest. There is someone for everyone is a pure lie. This is not happening in nature. This might only happen in a forced monogamous human society though and it happened in history almost everywhere. Because men was the one that women had to depend on. Women had no value and contributed nothing to society and could not survive without a men. Women were just for breeding but this has changed rapidly in recent years.
In very basic terms being the fittest requires is physical and non physical power and chad looks. Unless we eliminate chad (with any kind of way, there are no ethics or morals in nature), or create different competition areas where we are at the top but chad is not, we don't have any chance.
However humans are civilized so we have other rules on top of nature itself so it is very reasonable to expect that the governments must provide us escorts/wives as a service just like taxes are used for abortions of foids in many countries.
In very basic terms being the fittest requires is physical and non physical power and chad looks. Unless we eliminate chad (with any kind of way, there are no ethics or morals in nature), or create different competition areas where we are at the top but chad is not, we don't have any chance.
However humans are civilized so we have other rules on top of nature itself so it is very reasonable to expect that the governments must provide us escorts/wives as a service just like taxes are used for abortions of foids in many countries.
Last edited:
I feel so much the same! The world is too cruel to actually know all this shit. I wish I was an animal.
Why is that something that's supposed to take care of itself?
Yes, if you notice other people's relationships you will see that it started randomly and they didn't have to go to insane lengths to get a gf.
Nature is a beast. Men tame beasts and did have nature tamed and chained. Cucks and Feminazis let the beast of nature get unchained and now we are in the situation we are in.
Yeah, non-incels have it that way for them, but I don't think that's a part of nature. It's a part of culture. There's no rule that says it's supposed to take care of itself.
this is not the same thing however.
survival of the fittest is a term meant to describe capability, not good characteristics (genetics).
the fittest is a term meant for anyone who manages to survive and reproduce.
so this does not seem like a natural process. in nature its not the biggest gorilla that wins, but the gorilla that wins fights. but somehow humans are even more simplistic than animals when it comes to attraction. you are defeated before setting a foot in the battlefield
because it is not natural to us, besides getting rejected. And there are cucks who are still bluepilled, our analyzing may help more incels see that we are right and give us more power in resisting the evil foids.
Similar threads
Blackpill
The Guardian goes full teenlovepill - "The big idea: why we should take teenage love more seriously"
- WorthlessSlavicShit
- Inceldom Discussion
SlayerSlayer
Users who are viewing this thread
