Most Turks have Chinese Yellow River DNA
It's time for Turks to accept their Chinese heritage
View: https://youtu.be/OjNpRbNdR7E
Most Turks have Chinese Yellow River DNA
It's time for Turks to accept their Chinese heritage
View: https://youtu.be/OjNpRbNdR7E
Turkey is in Europe and many of them have white skin so it's only natural they'd accept being European.
the only people that manage to larp as white, yellow, and black
@Diddy remember what i said on twatter
Most Turks who look like Europeans don't actually have Turkish DNA. In fact, they have Slavic, Albanian, Caucasian, Greek, and other influences.
Even the Turkish nationalists of the Young Turks were not Turkish. Enver Pasha was Albanian. Talaat Pasha was Bulgarian, and Ahmed Cemal Pasha was Circassian.
turks get hated too much because they're muslim and almost dominated europe. also modern white nats are estrogenic and progressive and so have strong hatred for conservative culture
I agree, the modern right wing movements are too progressive to die for, there are a bajillion homosexuals among their ranks.
Even most straight people are sleeping around though, we essentially need a reactionary split-off.
Turks
I am an Turk.
Genetically, we are Anatolians.
But I wouldn't consider myself European, and most Turks wouldn't.
Most turks would consider themselves Turkish or Anatolian.
3% of its total land area is in Europe and most don't.
We kicked their teeth in you obtuse blockhead. No idea what history you're referring to.
Any white person soyjacking over Turks is rightfully to be deemed a race traitor, foe of Europe and should be treated accordingly; and the WNs who do at the expense of white Greeks because of 30s national socialist discourse forget to recognise the difference between understanding impersonal mechanisms for national resurrection and the baseline friend-vs.-foe distinction.
Last edited:
It's from usung the coffee machines
Serbian propagandist. keep coping. i think its cringe.
that 3% contains 25% of the population of the entire nation, and contains an massive cultural and economic hub. + Turks are genetically Anatolians and have 98% continuity with them.
The rest of your post is just straight up nationalistic cope. Imagine worshipping Western Europeans lmaooo.
creating some arbitrary criterion on why Anatolians/Turks aren't European. I agree with you, they aren't, but this is just straight up cope man.
Last edited:
Ottoman Serbia - Wikipedia
Ottoman Greece - Wikipedia
Not to mention an majority of Serbian leaders throughout history allied with the Turks to help them vanquish their foes and enemies, so I guess they are race traitors right? The leaders you oh so, worship right?
Your nation has existed for give or take 679 years, so you spent half of your time under Ottoman Rule. Isn't that right?
I don't think i'm european idk who thinks that way
A population cluster on one fringe doesn't change the fact that most of the country is geographically, culturally, and genetically Asian - only a few are even European by ancestry. All of modern European Turkey was also Byzantine territory before the Ottoman conquest, so if you want to be smartass, that wasn't your rightful land in the first place.
Source consulted: the bong.
Turks are a different people whose ethnogenesis resulted in the actual natives mixing with central Asian invaders. So no, it isn't "arbitrary," and Turks do have substantial Turkic ancestry. My own source comes from a scholarly census:
That's why they cluster closer to Armenians and Persians than to Greeks.
It wasn't the "majority" of leaders; serb leaders who allied with Ottomans were exceptions (usually for short-term realpolitik or survival), and most resisted Ottoman control when they could.358 years of Ottoman Rule.Ottoman Serbia - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
459 years of Ottoman Rule.Ottoman Greece - Wikipedia
Not to mention an majority of Serbian leaders throughout history allied with the Turks to help them vanquish their foes and enemies, so I guess they are race traitors right? The leaders you oh so, worship right?
Your nation has existed for give or take 679 years, so you spent half of your time under Ottoman Rule. Isn't that right?
First Serbian Uprising - Wikipedia
Second Serbian Uprising - Wikipedia
But let's look at the facts here:
- Turks are the Mexicans of Eurasia
- Ottoman emperors had been taking white concubines for centuries, whitening their lineage
- The strongest military units were white Balkanites
You pederast faggots have the worst case of hoteppery in all of Eurasia. Fuck off!
the funny thing is ottomans weren't even turks, the ottomans hated when europeans called them turks and saw it as an insult because turks were the poor peasants. back then we were hated and now we are too, and we are also the scapegoat xD
Least retarded Kemalist.
one of the few things i am proud of as a turk is that we never made salty propaganda posters like this to ridicule our enemies, at least we had honor in this way in our defeat, or in our victories. that is so niggerishWe kicked their teeth in you obtuse blockhead. No idea what history you're referring to.
well at least i spoke my mind instead of hurling insults
It's the least we could've done, dear Turkroach, considering we endured mass killings, forced conversions, slavery, systemic repression, pederasty, and tons more under their rule. Frankly, I'd argue that's far more "niggerish" than crafting up a few propaganda posters.
did you even read the post???A population cluster on one fringe doesn't change the fact that most of the country is geographically, culturally, and genetically Asian - only a few are even European by ancestry. All of modern European Turkey was also Byzantine territory before the Ottoman conquest, so if you want to be smartass, that wasn't your rightful land in the first place.
Source consulted: the bong.
Turks are a different people whose ethnogenesis resulted in the actual natives mixing with central Asian invaders. So no, it isn't "arbitrary," and Turks do have substantial Turkic ancestry. My own source comes from a scholarly census:
View attachment 1601123
That's why they cluster closer to Armenians and Persians than to Greeks.
View attachment 1601122
It wasn't the "majority" of leaders; serb leaders who allied with Ottomans were exceptions (usually for short-term realpolitik or survival), and most resisted Ottoman control when they could.
First Serbian Uprising - Wikipedia
Second Serbian Uprising - Wikipedia
But let's look at the facts here:
All that, yet you've the brazen face to talk about MY country? Had you lived in any empire predating the Ottomans you would have been an inconsequential catimite, just like you are today. So superiour, yet your shitskin mongrel faggot empire's success was due to manipulating and coercing more genetically competent people.
- Turks are the Mexicans of Eurasia
- Ottoman emperors had been taking white concubines for centuries, whitening their lineage
- The strongest military units were white Balkanites
You pederast faggots have the worst case of hoteppery in all of Eurasia. Fuck off!
my point is that Turks are Anatolians.
case in point, straight to ridicule
but you were just saying that you beat and massacred turks, and now you are saying the opposite.
drop this pointless nationalism. every side in history has committed massacres against each other. my ancestors were peasants that got fucked by all sides, including the ottomans, and the same is probably true for yours as well.
A population cluster on one fringe doesn't change the fact that most of the country is geographically, culturally, and genetically Asian - only a few are even European by ancestry. All of modern European Turkey was also Byzantine territory before the Ottoman conquest, so if you want to be smartass, that wasn't your rightful land in the first place.
Source consulted: the bong.
Turks are a different people whose ethnogenesis resulted in the actual natives mixing with central Asian invaders. So no, it isn't "arbitrary," and Turks do have substantial Turkic ancestry. My own source comes from a scholarly census:
View attachment 1601123
That's why they cluster closer to Armenians and Persians than to Greeks.
View attachment 1601122
It wasn't the "majority" of leaders; serb leaders who allied with Ottomans were exceptions (usually for short-term realpolitik or survival), and most resisted Ottoman control when they could.
First Serbian Uprising - Wikipedia
Second Serbian Uprising - Wikipedia
But let's look at the facts here:
All that, yet you've the brazen face to talk about MY country? Had you lived in any empire predating the Ottomans you would have been an inconsequential catimite, just like you are today. So superiour, yet your shitskin mongrel faggot empire's success was due to manipulating and coercing more genetically competent people.
- Turks are the Mexicans of Eurasia
- Ottoman emperors had been taking white concubines for centuries, whitening their lineage
- The strongest military units were white Balkanites
You pederast faggots have the worst case of hoteppery in all of Eurasia. Fuck off!
"Studies found that a ~15,000‑year‑old hunter‑gatherer from central Anatolia and the first Neolithic farmers from Anatolia share strong genetic continuity (~80–90%) indicating that the shift to farming did not involve large‑scale replacement but rather local adoption of farming by preexisting populations."
Late Pleistocene human genome suggests a local origin for the first farmers of central Anatolia - PubMed
Anatolia was home to some of the earliest farming communities. It has been long debated whether a migration of farming groups introduced agriculture to central Anatolia. Here, we report the first genome-wide data from a 15,000-year-old Anatolian hunter-gatherer and from seven Anatolian and...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
"In PCA analyses, ancient Anatolian populations (from central & northwestern Anatolia) cluster together, separately from European hunter-gatherer groups and Caucasus hunter-gatherers, but project within the broader West-Eurasian genetic variation. "
The Demographic Development of the First Farmers in Anatolia
The archaeological documentation of the development of sedentary farming societies in Anatolia is not yet mirrored by a genetic understanding of the h…
"“We present ancient genome‑wide sequence data from 6,700‑year‑old human remains excavated from a Neolithic context in Kumtepe, located in northwestern Anatolia … we show that this individual displays genetic similarities to the early European Neolithic gene pool and modern‑day Sardinians”
Genomic Evidence Establishes Anatolia as the Source of the European Neolithic Gene Pool - PubMed
Anatolia and the Near East have long been recognized as the epicenter of the Neolithic expansion through archaeological evidence. Recent archaeogenetic studies on Neolithic European human remains have shown that the Neolithic expansion in Europe was driven westward and northward by migration...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Turkish Population Structure and Genetic Ancestry... : Annals of Human Genetics
SummaryTurkey has experienced major population movements. Population structure and genetic relatedness of samples from three regions of Turkey, using...
The genetic structure of the Turkish population reveals high levels of variation and admixture - PubMed
The construction of population-based variomes has contributed substantially to our understanding of the genetic basis of human inherited disease. Here, we investigated the genetic structure of Turkey from 3,362 unrelated subjects whose whole exomes (<i>n</i> = 2,589) or whole genomes (<i>n</i> =...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Turkish population structure and genetic ancestry reveal relatedness among Eurasian populations - PubMed
Turkey has experienced major population movements. Population structure and genetic relatedness of samples from three regions of Turkey, using over 500,000 SNP genotypes, were compared together with Human Genome Diversity Panel (HGDP) data. To obtain a more representative sampling from Central...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Okay, so what now? I have definitetly proven that Anatolians have inhabited the Anatolian pennisuala and they formed the basis of Europe's gene pool, and have been closely related to European populations. And we have traced European groups/cultures to Anatolia.
Here is the kicker now.
Turks share an direct/genetic continuity and lineage through Anatolia.
"“Turkish people carry the legacy of both ancient people who lived in Anatolia for thousands of years covered by our study and people coming from Central Asia bearing Turkic languages.”
Here is the paper:
So what now? I have shown that Anatolians have been here since the hunter-gatherer phase, that they are distinct from European cultures, and are different from them, and several European farmers/cultures share lineage with Ancient Anatolian's, and I have also shown that Turks share continuity and legacy from Anatolians? So what now?
The graphs you posted, especially about the Turks sharing DNA or lineage with Armenians or Persians, means that they share legacy with the people that they inhabited Anatolia.
You completely misunderstood and attempted to misconstrue my argument to your own peril.
Your paper about Genetic admixture contradicts you, as it shows that Turks have an unique culture and they have an unique ethnic group dating back to various other groups, and an direct continuity between those Groups
The genetic structure of the Turkish population reveals high levels of variation and admixture - PMC
We delineated the fine-scale genetic structure of the Turkish population by using sequencing data of 3,362 unrelated Turkish individuals from different geographical origins and demonstrated the position of Turkey in terms of human migration and ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
"“extensive admixture between Balkan, Caucasus, Middle Eastern, and European populations with a closer genetic relationship of the TR population to Europeans than hitherto appreciated."
Last edited:
"the big cities become Islamic, although the Ottoman Empire has a relative tolerance for other religious confessions"
retard
muhh, muhhhh, muhhh slaverrry.
1. Possibility of social mobility
2. Highly feared and respected
3. Legal recognition and status
4. Varied and Good Social Lives
Sources:
Slavery in the Ottoman Empire and its Demise 1800‑1909 by Y. Hakan Erdem (1996)
Slavery and Abolition in the Ottoman Middle East by Ehud R. Toledano
“Slavery in the Ottoman Empire” by The Palgrave Handbook of Global Slavery throughout History (2023)
“Inherited institution: Ottoman state slavery and war captives in the early modern era” by Hülya Canbakal & Alpay Filiztekin (2020)
“Ottoman Slavery and Abolition in the Nineteenth Century” by Michael Ferguson & Toledano
Your people deserved way worse, to be honest. You guys are scum.
Literally none of those things happened. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millet_(Ottoman_Empire)
This you?
“The Serbian bachelors and volunteers, accompanied by many Serbian soldiers, all of a sudden rushed through the streets of Belgrade like wild animals, slaughtering and killing all that worshipped Mohammed and were suitable for carrying arms. When the streets had emptied, Turkish houses and shops, baths and places of worship were broken into and destroyed and Turks were searched for in all corners and underground passages to be slaughtered and killed.”
Massacre of the Belgrad Turks (1807) – Balkan Academia
Massacres of Belgrade Turks (1807) were a series of massacres and killing committed by Serb revolters and civilians against Turks and Muslims in Belgrade during the First Serbian Uprising in 1804 and 1807[1]. These events were considered to be part of an ethnic cleansing[2]. Serb historian...
balkanacademia.com
Izveštaj Međunarodne komisije (str. 151)
“with fire and sword. And if Albania cannot be conquered, then at least the Albanian people can be exterminated.”
"On July 8, the Servians arrived in Kavadartsi and killed twenty-five
Bulgarians, mostly refugees from neighboring villages, among them were the mayor and
five notables of their own town. The mayor was accused of tearing up a Servian flag and
helping the Macedonians. Two lads aged thirteen and fifteen, named Dorev, were killed
because a bomb had exploded near their house, and they were absurdly suspected. He
saw the bodies, which were all buried, still bound, just outside the town. He witnessed the
pillage of about thirty shops and the burning of fifteen houses. Four women went mad
from fear in their flight from Kavadartsi and two of them are said to have killed their own
children, lest they should fall into the hands of the Servians"
we need total serb death (in vidya game except for nico bellic)This you?
“The Serbian bachelors and volunteers, accompanied by many Serbian soldiers, all of a sudden rushed through the streets of Belgrade like wild animals, slaughtering and killing all that worshipped Mohammed and were suitable for carrying arms. When the streets had emptied, Turkish houses and shops, baths and places of worship were broken into and destroyed and Turks were searched for in all corners and underground passages to be slaughtered and killed.”
“thousand of men, women, children and old people who were slain or tortured to death” the report describes how “entire villages were marauded and burnt to the ground and the women and young girls being raped, and the countryside plundered, ravaged and swimming in blood.”Massacre of the Belgrad Turks (1807) – Balkan Academia
Massacres of Belgrade Turks (1807) were a series of massacres and killing committed by Serb revolters and civilians against Turks and Muslims in Belgrade during the First Serbian Uprising in 1804 and 1807[1]. These events were considered to be part of an ethnic cleansing[2]. Serb historian...
Izveštaj Međunarodne komisije (str. 151)
“with fire and sword. And if Albania cannot be conquered, then at least the Albanian people can be exterminated.”
"On July 8, the Servians arrived in Kavadartsi and killed twenty-five
Bulgarians, mostly refugees from neighboring villages, among them were the mayor and
five notables of their own town. The mayor was accused of tearing up a Servian flag and
helping the Macedonians. Two lads aged thirteen and fifteen, named Dorev, were killed
because a bomb had exploded near their house, and they were absurdly suspected. He
saw the bodies, which were all buried, still bound, just outside the town. He witnessed the
pillage of about thirty shops and the burning of fifteen houses. Four women went mad
from fear in their flight from Kavadartsi and two of them are said to have killed their own
children, lest they should fall into the hands of the Servians"
Ottoman actions were largely retaliatory or preventive, whereas Serbian atrocities often had an ethno-nationalist motive.
Leopold von Ranke, “History of the Ottoman Empire”
Sima Ćirković, “The Serbs” (2004)
Jozo Tomasevich, “War and Revolution in Yugoslavia”
British travelogues and diplomatic reports (early 19th c.)
i.e, you deserved everything that happened to you.
I wouldn't have minded you at all if you hadn't decided to chime in like a complete asshat. It is dumb to hold exclusively to petty nationalism, but if you expect me to be okay with a Turk trying to justify a foreign empire that arguably treated non-Muslims far worse, that's utterly ridiculous.
The mere fact that you had no idea how to properly refer to Anatolian farmers, and didn't even notice that the study that underscores the "98% continuity" figure wasn't referring modern Turks betokens your double digit IQ. That, and the fact that the Anatolian farmers don't share most of their continuinity with modern Turks but Sardinians.View attachment 1601153
"Studies found that a ~15,000‑year‑old hunter‑gatherer from central Anatolia and the first Neolithic farmers from Anatolia share strong genetic continuity (~80–90%) indicating that the shift to farming did not involve large‑scale replacement but rather local adoption of farming by preexisting populations."
View attachment 1601154View attachment 1601155View attachment 1601156Late Pleistocene human genome suggests a local origin for the first farmers of central Anatolia - PubMed
Anatolia was home to some of the earliest farming communities. It has been long debated whether a migration of farming groups introduced agriculture to central Anatolia. Here, we report the first genome-wide data from a 15,000-year-old Anatolian hunter-gatherer and from seven Anatolian and...
"In PCA analyses, ancient Anatolian populations (from central & northwestern Anatolia) cluster together, separately from European hunter-gatherer groups and Caucasus hunter-gatherers, but project within the broader West-Eurasian genetic variation. "
View attachment 1601157The Demographic Development of the First Farmers in Anatolia
The archaeological documentation of the development of sedentary farming societies in Anatolia is not yet mirrored by a genetic understanding of the h…www.sciencedirect.com
"“We present ancient genome‑wide sequence data from 6,700‑year‑old human remains excavated from a Neolithic context in Kumtepe, located in northwestern Anatolia … we show that this individual displays genetic similarities to the early European Neolithic gene pool and modern‑day Sardinians”
“Therefore, these observations directly link the early European Neolithic gene pool to western Anatolia.”Genomic Evidence Establishes Anatolia as the Source of the European Neolithic Gene Pool - PubMed
Anatolia and the Near East have long been recognized as the epicenter of the Neolithic expansion through archaeological evidence. Recent archaeogenetic studies on Neolithic European human remains have shown that the Neolithic expansion in Europe was driven westward and northward by migration...
"Turkey has experienced major population movements. Population structure and genetic relatedness of samples from three regions of Turkey, using over 500,000 SNP genotypes, were compared together with Human Genome Diversity Panel (HGDP) data. To obtain a more representative sampling from Central Asia, Kyrgyz samples (Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan) were genotyped and analysed. Principal component (PC) analysis reveals a significant overlap between Turks and Middle Easterners and a relationship with Europeans and South and Central Asians; however, the Turkish genetic structure is unique."Turkish Population Structure and Genetic Ancestry... : Annals of Human Genetics
SummaryTurkey has experienced major population movements. Population structure and genetic relatedness of samples from three regions of Turkey, using...www.ovid.com
View attachment 1601158
(9% Admixture btw)The genetic structure of the Turkish population reveals high levels of variation and admixture - PubMed
The construction of population-based variomes has contributed substantially to our understanding of the genetic basis of human inherited disease. Here, we investigated the genetic structure of Turkey from 3,362 unrelated subjects whose whole exomes (<i>n</i> = 2,589) or whole genomes (<i>n</i> =...
View attachment 1601159Turkish population structure and genetic ancestry reveal relatedness among Eurasian populations - PubMed
Turkey has experienced major population movements. Population structure and genetic relatedness of samples from three regions of Turkey, using over 500,000 SNP genotypes, were compared together with Human Genome Diversity Panel (HGDP) data. To obtain a more representative sampling from Central...
View attachment 1601160
View attachment 1601161
No you didn't, kiddo. All you've done is just ousted yourself as an idiot because you cannot understand simple dichotomies - in fact, you proved my point right here:Okay, so what now? I have definitetly proven that Anatolians have inhabited the Anatolian pennisuala and they formed the basis of Europe's gene pool, and have been closely related to European populations. And we have traced European groups/cultures to Anatolia.
Here is the kicker now.
Turks share an direct/genetic continuity and lineage through Anatolia.
"“Turkish people carry the legacy of both ancient people who lived in Anatolia for thousands of years covered by our study and people coming from Central Asia bearing Turkic languages.”
Here is the paper:
So what now? I have shown that Anatolians have been here since the hunter-gatherer phase, that they are distinct from European cultures, and are different from them, and several European farmers/cultures share lineage with Ancient Anatolian's, and I have also shown that Turks share continuity and legacy from Anatolians? So what now?
The graphs you posted, especially about the Turks sharing DNA or lineage with Armenians or Persians, means that they share legacy with the people that they inhabited Anatolia.
You completely misunderstood and attempted to misconstrue my argument to your own peril.
Your paper about Genetic admixture contradicts you, as it shows that Turks have an unique culture and they have an unique ethnic group dating back to various other groups, and an direct continuity between those Groups
What your paper found:The genetic structure of the Turkish population reveals high levels of variation and admixture - PMC
We delineated the fine-scale genetic structure of the Turkish population by using sequencing data of 3,362 unrelated Turkish individuals from different geographical origins and demonstrated the position of Turkey in terms of human migration and ...
"“extensive admixture between Balkan, Caucasus, Middle Eastern, and European populations with a closer genetic relationship of the TR population to Europeans than hitherto appreciated."
Just because modern Turks carry some Anatolian ancestry or live in the land the ANF inhabited does not mean that they're the same people as the ANF, but we've already ascertained that you resemble chimps in cognitive functions, so I shan't expect you understand anything related to archaeogenetics.
Lash out some more you 80 IQ Turkroach muppet
Did even you read the post.
Literally, it proved first.
1) Anatolian farmers + huntergatherers are the same people
2) The second point is completely bogus
You are just a complete idiot.
First of all, the last source proved that Turks carry the genetic lineage and continuity with Ancient Anatolians.
Secondly, Anatolian farmers don't share most of their DNA with Sardinians, it is stupid to think so. Turks share most of their ancestry with Anatolians.
Thirdly, modern Turks carrying Anatolian continuity and DNA shows that they are part of the same people, or have lived their for an long time.
You are literally just disregarding scientific evidence to pursue your own ultranationalist thing.
The pipeline was easy to follow.
1) Anatolian farmers and huntergarthers are the same people showing continous habitation of Anatolia
2) Anatolian farmers/people are unique ethnic group.
3) Major European groups trace their ancestry from Anatolia
4) Anatolians and Turks are the same or share genetic diversity.
Last edited:
What happened to your "anti racism" there? And why don't you ever call out Turkish/Ottoman actions against europe if you're such a proud, anti-racist SJW?
Literally, just lying at this point. Are we serious?
Late Pleistocene human genome suggests a local origin for the first farmers of central Anatolia - PubMed
Anatolia was home to some of the earliest farming communities. It has been long debated whether a migration of farming groups introduced agriculture to central Anatolia. Here, we report the first genome-wide data from a 15,000-year-old Anatolian hunter-gatherer and from seven Anatolian and...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The genetic structure of the Turkish population reveals high levels of variation and admixture - PMC
We delineated the fine-scale genetic structure of the Turkish population by using sequencing data of 3,362 unrelated Turkish individuals from different geographical origins and demonstrated the position of Turkey in terms of human migration and ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The genetic history of the Southern Arc: a bridge between West Asia and Europe - PMC
By sequencing 727 ancient individuals from the Southern Arc (Anatolia and neighbors in Southeastern Europe and West Asia) over 10,000 years, we contextualize its Chalcolithic and Bronze Ages (~5000-1000BCE), when extensive gene flow entangled it ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Genomic Evidence Establishes Anatolia as the Source of the European Neolithic Gene Pool
Anatolia and the Near East have long been recognized as the epicenter of the Neolithic expansion through archaeological evidence. Recent archaeogeneti…
Turkish(Ancient Anatolian) Ancestry: 90%+
Last edited:
legit clearly joking.
I love it, when I debunk people, they always go crying that I lack intelligence or that I have low-iq instead of actually debunking anything. They just keep going in circles. Its always the ad-homemium attacks, which one busts out once they are losing.
Didn't you get cooked for being hypocrite faggot a while back? You are an retarded faggot whore.
Last edited:
R
Because they are Greek Scythians.
"138" iq getting destroyed and incapable of using scientific evidence nor reasoning.
you are probably just another idiotic liar.
'white' nationalist btw
fantasizing about pajeeta or an ethnic whore LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I'm racist against everyone, both whites and non-whites. but in this case serbs are clearly the aggressors
RETARDED IDIOT.
UNABLE TO GRASP AMERICAN HISTORY AT ALL.
COMPLETE MISUNDERSTANDING OF INCLUSIVE ECONOMIC INSITUTIONS AND POLITICAL INSITUTIONS. RETARDED IDIOTIC FAGGOT.
'MONGREL' ZONE JFL, chat world's best superpower. unchallenged hegemon.
Turkey is in Asia.
At least 99% of the country.
And Turks are not white.
nope, that's not at all what i said. the ottoman empire did treat muslims better than non muslims, and i wasn't trying to justify its atrocities at all. but you my friend were being racist towards me.
also you're a serb? your people committed atrocities like 3 decades ago you have no right to talk lmao. and your nation worked together with the ottoman empire at times. you have absolutely no right to talk about atrocities here xd. the ottoman empire owned the balkans for centuries yet all of those nations and cultures that existed prior are still there today. when serbs got power for the first time in a millennium, the first thing they did was commit massacres against defenseless villagers
Aggressors? The Ottomans forcefully ruled over them initially and caused that by introducing Islam and by everything else I already mentioned.
Love it when you guys blow your cover; take note of the fact that you, by your own admission, condone Ottoman atrocities and colonialism against whites, yet paint them out as evil for defending themselves.
Oh no, a Turk on the internet is offended by mere words after 4 centuries of his empire's boots on everyone's necks! My horror!
"Your nation did bad things too, and committed the first acts of liberation after a millennium of occupation, plus the old cultures are still here so just....eat shit and be happy."
Try again.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
