NotQuiteChadLite
The Meeks shall inherit the Earth
★
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2018
- Posts
- 4,439
Seriously, it blows my mind at how many “men” are becoming complete supplicating semi-eunuchs who think M’lady points will lead to mutual respect and sex. Dear cucks: a woman will never respect you if you’re seen as beneath her. Being a good little cuckboi is not how you get women to respect and admire you if you’re not chad.
There’s only a couple of reasons why this cuck epidemic could be happening: media brainwashing and non Chad men thinking that licking boots and kissing ass is an effective coping mechanism. Thinking that Being a feminized little bitchboy “feminist ally” is somehow a path to sex just blows my mind, and is uniquely a modern, western thing. Do you think men 80 years ago coped with being low value by doing this:
In the 1940s this low T soycel would have coped with a factory job and alcohol, not progressive soy attitudes. He would have been a pretty happy betabux who got to continue his lineage at least, even if he wasn’t the most attractive guy around. In no way shape or form would he been bending the knee to women’s feelings in an attempt to break out of inceldom by incessantly agreeing with m’lady while denouncing anything and everything masculine.
And make no mistake: most of these feminist allys are just failed Nice Guys who cope with cuckmaxxing in the hope that it will get them a whiff of pussy, how many actually care about muh oppression and muh wage gap? Almost none of them.
Women don’t like submissive cuckold pansies, women like assertive dominant chads who will put them in their place if their masculinity is challenged. There is actually some truth to this redpilled sounding nonsense, believe it not, as it is a women’s nature to be submissive to a masculine, dominant male. Femininity is attracted to masculinity. Of course Chad can act like a little meek bitchboy but as long as his genetics say “masculine” that’s what will register in women’s minds. 6’3 large framed Chad can’t be unmasculine even if he was wearing a ballerina tutu.
The point is most men aren’t Chad which is why low value cucks are gravitating towards cuckmaxxing, as they think it’s a path to not dying alone as a low value worthless specimen. They couldn’t be any more wrong. Any woman with a cuck soyfriend doesn’t respect him, and these are overwhelmingly the majority of relationships that fail or turn into open relationships, and of course the cuck agrees to being in an open relationship because subliminally he knows it’s the best he can hope for, all while telling his partner “sweetie, your body your choice! If you want to get railed by masculine chads and Tyrones (because I can’t possibly provide your masculinity fix) then who am I to stop you? That would be toxic, controlling masculinity to want a monogamous relationship, you deserve the best!”
TL;DR: it blows my mind how many soycels are resorting to cuckoldmaxxing in the hopes of finally getting laid, they’re too low IQ to realize that their women aren’t attracted to them nor do they respect them in the slightest.
There’s only a couple of reasons why this cuck epidemic could be happening: media brainwashing and non Chad men thinking that licking boots and kissing ass is an effective coping mechanism. Thinking that Being a feminized little bitchboy “feminist ally” is somehow a path to sex just blows my mind, and is uniquely a modern, western thing. Do you think men 80 years ago coped with being low value by doing this:
In the 1940s this low T soycel would have coped with a factory job and alcohol, not progressive soy attitudes. He would have been a pretty happy betabux who got to continue his lineage at least, even if he wasn’t the most attractive guy around. In no way shape or form would he been bending the knee to women’s feelings in an attempt to break out of inceldom by incessantly agreeing with m’lady while denouncing anything and everything masculine.
And make no mistake: most of these feminist allys are just failed Nice Guys who cope with cuckmaxxing in the hope that it will get them a whiff of pussy, how many actually care about muh oppression and muh wage gap? Almost none of them.
Women don’t like submissive cuckold pansies, women like assertive dominant chads who will put them in their place if their masculinity is challenged. There is actually some truth to this redpilled sounding nonsense, believe it not, as it is a women’s nature to be submissive to a masculine, dominant male. Femininity is attracted to masculinity. Of course Chad can act like a little meek bitchboy but as long as his genetics say “masculine” that’s what will register in women’s minds. 6’3 large framed Chad can’t be unmasculine even if he was wearing a ballerina tutu.
The point is most men aren’t Chad which is why low value cucks are gravitating towards cuckmaxxing, as they think it’s a path to not dying alone as a low value worthless specimen. They couldn’t be any more wrong. Any woman with a cuck soyfriend doesn’t respect him, and these are overwhelmingly the majority of relationships that fail or turn into open relationships, and of course the cuck agrees to being in an open relationship because subliminally he knows it’s the best he can hope for, all while telling his partner “sweetie, your body your choice! If you want to get railed by masculine chads and Tyrones (because I can’t possibly provide your masculinity fix) then who am I to stop you? That would be toxic, controlling masculinity to want a monogamous relationship, you deserve the best!”
TL;DR: it blows my mind how many soycels are resorting to cuckoldmaxxing in the hopes of finally getting laid, they’re too low IQ to realize that their women aren’t attracted to them nor do they respect them in the slightest.
Last edited: