Why blacks are actually more passive on average

[Pikacel]

Yes blacks commit 2x more crimes on AVERAGE

But we need to look at MODES and MEANS

If you seriously analyse black on black crime you realise it’s 90% innocent urkelcels getting caught in drive bys and muggings by 10% of thugmaxx Tyrones. Why is this the case?

Basically our AVERAGE docility creates a disparity or ‘inequality’ where a minority of high T males effortlessly annihilate the 90% of low T faggots. This leads to a phenomenon of repeat offenders easily preying on high inhib urkel cucks like me.

High-trust societies don’t stem from civility, they stem from mutually assured destruction between strong males leading to a social contract. This is why ethnics are prone to instability, because a group of high T males can dominate them easily. Look at Latino spics for example, skinnyfat subhumans yet their countries are rife with organised crime and violence.

Hence whites high-trust behaviour stems from acknowledging that without LAWS and MANNERS whites will ANNIHILATE each other and create chaos (feudalism and ancient tribal times).

White people are more aggressive so they can defend themselves against criminals. Thug tyrones can’t do shit to the average white male. You have to understand that a few 1000 white colonial officers raped murdered and conquered millions of africans. When a race is so submissive as to be enslaved so easily of course it will be rife with internal instability and crime.

Not saying this is a good thing. In fact cowards like me deserve to be gassed. We create instability by existing.

Hence rather than becoming MORE CUCKED AND CIVILISED Blacks NEED TO BECOME MORE VIOLENT so violent males cancel each other out creating a high-trust ‘mutually assured destruction’ society.

 

[ChildishKillah]

Interesting theory

 

[literallyretarded]

 

[DOGGOCEL333]

It’s nice to hear about a genuinely novel idea on black people that is not some banal reiteration of “muh black people are actually Nietzschean.”

 

[Kshatriya]

It’s nice to hear about a genuinely novel idea on black people that is not some banal reiteration of “muh black people are actually Nietzschean.”

I thought I inveted that in my post years ago on org explainint why trap music is the closest thing to übermensch

 

[DOGGOCEL333]

I thought I inveted that in my post years ago on org explainint why trap music is the closest thing to übermensch

Nah bruh this shitt goes way back,
Even the cuck French were talking about the beebeesea. Here's an exerpt from the book "daries of Anaïs nin"
'As a man in power enslaving a powerless primitive. I think when the first white man went to seek slaves for menial work and chose the Negro, there was a subconscious drama being played out below the practical need. He wanted to dominate his own instinctive primitive self, since the whole object of the white man's de velopment was mastering and repudiating his primitive force, his nature.
When he invented sails, steam, electricity it was to master, en-slave and prove himself a ruler over nature. When he enslaved the Negro it was to prove himself stronger than nature. And what a revenge nature wreaked upon the white man. For as he advanced into control of nature, he lost his natural vitality and power. In proportion to his mastery of the elements, he lost his other power as man; the more he invented, mechanized, made music boxes in-stead of playing instruments, the more impotent he grew in his body.
His senses are less keen, his muscles less enduring, his eyes less sharp, his hearing insensitive. He poured his blood into machines, bridges, and was left a robot with a brain. And meanwhile, while his humanity atrophied, his direct warm contact with human beings broken by his abstract way of life, the Negro, his slave, grew in beauty and natural strength and balance of body and mind and senses. Retained emotion.'

 

[Kshatriya]

Nah bruh this shitt goes way back,
Even the cuck French were talking about the beebeesea. Here's an exerpt from the book "daries of Anaïs nin"
'As a man in power enslaving a powerless primitive. I think when the first white man went to seek slaves for menial work and chose the Negro, there was a subconscious drama being played out below the practical need. He wanted to dominate his own instinctive primitive self, since the whole object of the white man's de velopment was mastering and repudiating his primitive force, his nature.
When he invented sails, steam, electricity it was to master, en-slave and prove himself a ruler over nature. When he enslaved the Negro it was to prove himself stronger than nature. And what a revenge nature wreaked upon the white man. For as he advanced into control of nature, he lost his natural vitality and power. In proportion to his mastery of the elements, he lost his other power as man; the more he invented, mechanized, made music boxes in-stead of playing instruments, the more impotent he grew in his body.
His senses are less keen, his muscles less enduring, his eyes less sharp, his hearing insensitive. He poured his blood into machines, bridges, and was left a robot with a brain. And meanwhile, while his humanity atrophied, his direct warm contact with human beings broken by his abstract way of life, the Negro, his slave, grew in beauty and natural strength and balance of body and mind and senses. Retained emotion.'

Very interesting. Doesn't this sound very much like Hegel's slave dialectic to you?
Ps: ovver for my creativity

 

[MuhDigitalFootprint]

Nah bruh this shitt goes way back,
Even the cuck French were talking about the beebeesea. Here's an exerpt from the book "daries of Anaïs nin"
'As a man in power enslaving a powerless primitive. I think when the first white man went to seek slaves for menial work and chose the Negro, there was a subconscious drama being played out below the practical need. He wanted to dominate his own instinctive primitive self, since the whole object of the white man's de velopment was mastering and repudiating his primitive force, his nature.
When he invented sails, steam, electricity it was to master, en-slave and prove himself a ruler over nature. When he enslaved the Negro it was to prove himself stronger than nature. And what a revenge nature wreaked upon the white man. For as he advanced into control of nature, he lost his natural vitality and power. In proportion to his mastery of the elements, he lost his other power as man; the more he invented, mechanized, made music boxes in-stead of playing instruments, the more impotent he grew in his body.
His senses are less keen, his muscles less enduring, his eyes less sharp, his hearing insensitive. He poured his blood into machines, bridges, and was left a robot with a brain. And meanwhile, while his humanity atrophied, his direct warm contact with human beings broken by his abstract way of life, the Negro, his slave, grew in beauty and natural strength and balance of body and mind and senses. Retained emotion.'

the negro sure has grown... in obesity

 

[DOGGOCEL333]

Very interesting. Doesn't this sound very much like Hegel's slave dialectic to you?
Ps: ovver for my creativity

Idk I never read hegel, I hate that níggër

 

[retributor]

they need deterrence

 

[Kshatriya]

Idk I never read hegel, I hate that níggër

Check It out:

Hegel’s master–slave dialectic is about how self-consciousness develops through relationships with others.
Two people meet and each wants to be recognized as independent and important. This leads to a struggle. One becomes the master, the other the slave.
The master has power and is recognized by the slave, but this recognition is weak because it comes from someone who is not free.
The slave is forced to work and obey, but through labor, effort, and dealing with reality, the slave develops skills, discipline, and a deeper understanding of themselves.
Over time, the slave becomes more self-aware and independent, while the master becomes dependent on the slave. Ironically, the slave ends up closer to true freedom.
In short:
Real freedom and self-knowledge come from work, struggle, and mutual recognition — not from domination.

 

[Deleted Member 8090]

Ok I agree they're nice people

 

[Deleted Member 8090]

Everyone is nice why do we hate each other

 

[Pikacel]

Check It out:

Hegel’s master–slave dialectic is about how self-consciousness develops through relationships with others.
Two people meet and each wants to be recognized as independent and important. This leads to a struggle. One becomes the master, the other the slave.
The master has power and is recognized by the slave, but this recognition is weak because it comes from someone who is not free.
The slave is forced to work and obey, but through labor, effort, and dealing with reality, the slave develops skills, discipline, and a deeper understanding of themselves.
Over time, the slave becomes more self-aware and independent, while the master becomes dependent on the slave. Ironically, the slave ends up closer to true freedom.
In short:
Real freedom and self-knowledge come from work, struggle, and mutual recognition — not from domination.

This explains the stagnation of Eastern despotism vs the vitality of European ‘civilised barbarity’

 

[Kshatriya]

This explains the stagnation of Eastern despotism vs the vitality of European ‘civilised barbarity’

Hmm high IQ take ngl

 

[Diddy]

This is the nigger cope equivalent of jeets thinking they have high SMV.

 

[The Supreme Goyim]

Its not a average lmao, blacks in America commit 52% of violent crime, while only being 13% of the population.

 

[Blackpill Monk]

This is the nigger cope equivalent of jeets thinking they have high SMV.

True

 

[Blackpill Monk]

@Hoodpreet what's your opinion on this masterpiece

 

[Jimb0]

Niggers are savages in the jungle, niggers are savages in the cities, niggers are savages among their own kind, niggers are savages among others, niggers are savages poor, niggers are savages rich. No amount of jew proved evidence will make me believe these animals deserve anything but the upmost of oppression and cruelty.

 

[Lonly ghost]

The privileged can effort to them make themselves look kind, nice and polite because they can just hire someone, non-priveleged person to do the dirty work for them .

The non-priveleged has to do crimes to survive because nobody helps them to survive.

That's why women appear " nicer " gender and men appear bad gender .

That's because women can hire a man to do the crime . Women do a lot of violence by proxy .

Men has to do the dirty work to survive.

Women are the privileged gender and men are the oppressed gender .

 

[Pikacel]

The privileged can effort to them make themselves look kind, nice and polite because they can just hire someone, non-priveleged person to do the dirty work for them .

The non-priveleged has to do crimes to survive because nobody helps them to survive.

That's why women appear " nicer " gender and men appear bad gender .

That's because women can hire a man to do the crime . Women do a lot of violence by proxy .

Men has to do the dirty work to survive.

Women are the privileged gender and men are the oppressed gender .

 

[Chirag gupta]

This is the nigger cope equivalent of jeets thinking they have high SMV.

 

[yeetbender_]

Nah bruh this shitt goes way back,
Even the cuck French were talking about the beebeesea. Here's an exerpt from the book "daries of Anaïs nin"
'As a man in power enslaving a powerless primitive. I think when the first white man went to seek slaves for menial work and chose the Negro, there was a subconscious drama being played out below the practical need. He wanted to dominate his own instinctive primitive self, since the whole object of the white man's de velopment was mastering and repudiating his primitive force, his nature.
When he invented sails, steam, electricity it was to master, en-slave and prove himself a ruler over nature. When he enslaved the Negro it was to prove himself stronger than nature. And what a revenge nature wreaked upon the white man. For as he advanced into control of nature, he lost his natural vitality and power. In proportion to his mastery of the elements, he lost his other power as man; the more he invented, mechanized, made music boxes in-stead of playing instruments, the more impotent he grew in his body.
His senses are less keen, his muscles less enduring, his eyes less sharp, his hearing insensitive. He poured his blood into machines, bridges, and was left a robot with a brain. And meanwhile, while his humanity atrophied, his direct warm contact with human beings broken by his abstract way of life, the Negro, his slave, grew in beauty and natural strength and balance of body and mind and senses. Retained emotion.'

Karma. Don't torture people for their leprosy. I guess segregation and euthanasia are forgivable, but nobody asks to be born under the curse. Don't be an ungreateful shit like they were.

 

[yeetbender_]

I honestly don't know anymore.

 

[Rapemaxxer]

Even for a nigger, your capacity for vomitting out profoundly retarded takes is exemplary. We ought to make a lab rat out of you and study just what makes your brain stand out as so subhuman even among a sea of other retarded niggers.

 

[Rapemaxxer]

Nah bruh this shitt goes way back,
Even the cuck French were talking about the beebeesea. Here's an exerpt from the book "daries of Anaïs nin"
'As a man in power enslaving a powerless primitive. I think when the first white man went to seek slaves for menial work and chose the Negro, there was a subconscious drama being played out below the practical need. He wanted to dominate his own instinctive primitive self, since the whole object of the white man's de velopment was mastering and repudiating his primitive force, his nature.
When he invented sails, steam, electricity it was to master, en-slave and prove himself a ruler over nature. When he enslaved the Negro it was to prove himself stronger than nature. And what a revenge nature wreaked upon the white man. For as he advanced into control of nature, he lost his natural vitality and power. In proportion to his mastery of the elements, he lost his other power as man; the more he invented, mechanized, made music boxes in-stead of playing instruments, the more impotent he grew in his body.
His senses are less keen, his muscles less enduring, his eyes less sharp, his hearing insensitive. He poured his blood into machines, bridges, and was left a robot with a brain. And meanwhile, while his humanity atrophied, his direct warm contact with human beings broken by his abstract way of life, the Negro, his slave, grew in beauty and natural strength and balance of body and mind and senses. Retained emotion.'