Blackpill Why asians are feminine looking

[Inceptorr]

This is just a theory from me.

the environment dictates if a race will be more feminine or masculine. The environment were asians are was simply not strong enought to create bigger masculine men. It means that asiana didnt need to evolve more masculine and stronger because it was not needed to survive on their environment also we need to factor that asians were one of the first to evolve on intelligent aspect but this means that they will devolve on their psyhic level because they need less pyhsic and brain will become more important. The same can be said about black men they had rougher environments thus stronger muscular men fitted the best for their environment. Black men evolved last and thats why they arr still muscular and more dumb. White men is more in the middle ground. More masculine means less evolved means dumber and means that the men and women are masculine looking. This is also why black women are undesirable because of their masculine look.

 

[Salustio]

They are ruined by their isolation. Sooner or later they will disappear from existence, because they are too weak and feminine.

 

[Deleted member 8499]

It's just their phenotype.

 

[Glimmer]

asians were one of the first to evolve on intelligent aspect but this means that they will devolve on their psyhic level because they need less pyhsic and brain will become more important

This is completely untrue. Homo-sapien as a species evolved to have higher intelligence as a result of increased brain size. The average Homo-sapien brain size is 1400cc, and this increase in brain size accounts for intelligence, not environmental factors. You are confusing cultural differences for intelligence differences, but all races have the same intelligence capacity as all are Homo-sapien.

 

[Deleted member 12355]

This is completely untrue. Homo-sapien as a species evolved to have higher intelligence as a result of increased brain size. The average Homo-sapien brain size is 1400cc, and this increase in brain size accounts for intelligence, not environmental factors. You are confusing cultural differences for intelligence differences, but all races have the same intelligence capacity as all are Homo-sapien.

eh? races differ on average in their anatomic brain structure and cranial capacity, fuck are you talking about?

 

[Inceptorr]

This is completely untrue. Homo-sapien as a species evolved to have higher intelligence as a result of increased brain size. The average Homo-sapien brain size is 1400cc, and this increase in brain size accounts for intelligence, not environmental factors. You are confusing cultural differences for intelligence differences, but all races have the same intelligence capacity as all are Homo-sapien.

The environment caused increas in brain size. Asians environment was fitted for only the smartest physic became less important. Blacks environment selected only muscular men bcause thats what was the fittest for the environment. There are racial differences in this counts also for intelligent between races.

 

[RodgersSecondAdvent]

eh? races differ on average in their anatomic brain structure and cranial capacity, fuck are you talking about?

That's not race-bound but climate-bound and even then you aren't accounting for the encephalization quotient.

 

[Cuyen]

It's just their phenotype.

 

[Glimmer]

eh? races differ on average in their anatomic brain structure and cranial capacity, fuck are you talking about?

From a quick google search.

Nathan Brody has also argued that the evidence regarding racial differences in brain size is not conclusive, and that, even if one accepts it, this difference does not support a genetic hypothesis regarding racial differences in intelligence.[24] Critics of the hereditarian position also note that the difference in mean brain size between blacks and whites is smaller than 1 standard deviation and is insufficient to explain the vast majority of the black-white IQ gap.[25]

All humans are the same, and all have the same intelligence capacity. You are masquerading pseudo-science as real science. I actually have a background in anthropology so understand. The differences if there are any are insignificant and inconsequential to intelligence and does not explain the IQ scores between races. That's because there are cultural reasons why some races have IQ more than others. Because they have more opportunity than others do, blacks in the United States are marginalized while whites are privileged and receive higher quality education. The same can be said for Asians. No race is smarter than any other race.

 

[Deleted member 12355]

That's not race-bound but climate-bound and even then you aren't accounting for the encephalization quotient.

what do you mean it's not race bound? A negroid that's growing up in the US will have a negroid skull shape, same as a caucasoid growing up in South Africa will have a caucasoid skull shape

From a quick google search.



All humans are the same, and all have the same intelligence capacity. You are masquerading pseudo-science as real science. I actually have a background in anthropology so understand. The differences if there are any are insignificant and inconsequential to intelligence and does not explain the IQ scores between races. That's because there are cultural reasons why some races have IQ more than others. Because they have more opportunity than others do, blacks in the United States are marginalized while whites are privileged and receive higher quality education. The same can be said for Asians. No race is smarter than any other race.

citation needed. This is retarded from an evolutionary standpoint. For this to be true, the selection pressure for intelligence would have to be the same all around the globe, which it clearly isn't. In Europe and north east Asia, one would have to plan for the winter in order to ensure one's survival, where as in Africa food was readily available all year around

 

[Glimmer]

what do you mean it's not race bound? A negroid that's growing up in the US will have a negroid skull shape, same as a caucasoid growing up in South Africa will have a caucasoid skull shape

citation needed.

Now I know how ridiculous you are, using debunked 1800s science of skull shapes and the supposed "three races" to make a point. I suggest you take a modern day introduction to human anthropology class at your local community college and educate yourself before continuing to make yourself look silly from your "science" gathered from white supremacist youtube videos.

 

[RodgersSecondAdvent]

what do you mean it's not race bound? A negroid that's growing up in the US will have a negroid skull shape, same as a caucasoid growing up in South Africa will have a caucasoid skull shape

citation needed.

It reflects climate as in where they originate from. Consequently you will see a smaller cranial capacity with South Indians and let's say the Vietnamese but that doesn't mean they're less intelligent.

 

[Deleted member 12355]

Now I know how ridiculous you are, using debunked 1800s science of skull shapes and the supposed "three races" to make a point. I suggest you take a modern day introduction to human anthropology class at your local community college and educate yourself before continuing to make yourself look silly from your "science" gathered from white supremacist youtube videos.

What do you mean? Do you deny differences in skull shapes between the races?

It reflects climate as in where they originate from. Consequently you will see a smaller cranial capacity with South Indians and let's say the Vietnamese but that doesn't mean they're less intelligent.

that's not the point discussed. @Glimmer said the brain size of each respective race was the same, which clearly isn't the case.

 

[RodgersSecondAdvent]

What do you mean? Do you deny differences in skull shapes between the races?

that's not the point discussed. @Glimmer said the brain size of each respective race was the same, which clearly isn't the case.

Intelligence was clearly the main point because you were trying to derive intelligence from raw cranial capacity.

 

[Glimmer]

What do you mean? Do you deny differences in skull shapes between the races?

that's not the point discussed. @Glimmer said the brain size of each respective race was the same, which clearly isn't the case.

I gave the average Homo-sapien brain size. I never said all races have the same brain size, and even if they don't it doesn't matter. Neanderthals had on average 1500cc yet did not have the language producing faculty that Homo-sapiens did. Bigger brain size does not mean smarter.

Studies in physical anthropology and neuroimaging have found that differences in average brain volume exist between various racial or ethnic groups,[1][2][3] but this variation has no relation to any difference in psychological traits or abilities. Despite having been repeatedly debunked, claims of a relationship between brain size and intelligence continue to appear in academic publications.

I have nothing more to add, continue believing your debunked 1800s obsolete "science". I suggest for your own sake you bring yourself to a 21st century level of understanding of human genetics by taking a human evolution class at an accredited higher education college or university and you would realize there is no such thing as race, and that no race is smarter or better than any other.

 

[Insomniac]

Soy

No one consumes more soy than Asian countries. It's why you rarely see masculine Asians.

 

[Deleted member 12355]

I gave the average Homo-sapien brain size. I never said all races have the same brain size, and even if they don't it doesn't matter. Neanderthals had on average 1500cc yet did not have the language producing faculty that Homo-sapiens did. Bigger brain size does not mean smarter.



I have nothing more to add, continue believing your debunked 1800s obsolete "science". I suggest for your own sake you bring yourself to a 21st century level of understanding of human genetics by taking a human evolution class at an accredited higher education college or university and you would realize there is no such thing as race, and that no race is smarter or better than any other.

so the selection pressure for intelligence is the same all over the globe? If what you're saying is correct, that would obviously have to be the case. The selection pressure for intelligence in Africa where food is readily available all year around would have to be the same as it is in Europe where one had to know how to farm and plan for the winter in order to survive. Denying race is as silly as denying that man has evolved in disparate locations across the globe

 

[Glimmer]

so the selection pressure for intelligence is the same all over the globe? If what you're saying is correct, that would obviously have to be the case. The selection pressure for intelligence in Africa where food is readily available all year around would have to be the same as it is in Europe where one had to know how to farm and plan for the winter in order to survive. Denying race is as silly as denying that man has evolved in disparate locations across the globe

Those are just cultural differences you're giving, not biological. Some races were able to develop agrarian societies while others had the environment that was more productive to hunting and gathering. It does not mean that one race is smarter than another, it only means they have different cultures. The selection pressure that led to the increase in brain size for Homo-sapiens already occurred 1000s of years ago, you are acting as if this is still going on. Evolutionary changes take 1000s and 1000 of years and human civilization as we know it is not nearly as old. You need a history class in addition to an evolution class.

 

[Inceldo]

Asians arent feminine looking. The most dom looking people i have seen have been asian

How many fat asians do you see? How many asians with man boobs are there? Wide hips? Hardly any. Now compare this to the west where every second guy is suffering from obesity and gyno. Asians dont get these problems because of high testosterone levels. In other words they are manly af.

 

[Deleted member 12355]

Those are just cultural differences you're giving, not biological. Some races were able to develop agrarian societies while others had the environment that was more productive to hunting and gathering. It does not mean that one race is smarter than another, it only means they have different cultures. The selection pressure that led to the increase in brain size for Homo-sapiens already occurred 1000s of years ago, you are acting as if this is still going on. Evolutionary changes take 1000s and 1000 of years and human civilization as we know it is not nearly as old. You need a history class in addition to an evolution class.

different environments select for different traits People who were low IQ in Europe experienced little reproductive success because they got culled as soon as winter came.

Man has evolved in disparate locations across the globe for tens of thousands of years.

 

[Smallframecel]

They are ruined by their isolation. Sooner or later they will disappear from existence, because they are too weak and feminine.

They will transhuman maxx

 

[GoonCel]

you have nice posts bro

 

[Blacktarpill]

Asians arent feminine looking. The most dom looking people i have seen have been asian

View attachment 72771

View attachment 72772


How many fat asians do you see? How many asians with man boobs are there? Wide hips? Hardly any. Now compare this to the west where every second guy is suffering from obesity and gyno. Asians dont get these problems because of high testosterone levels. In other words they are manly af.

Hikineets and jpop stars make them look feminine

 

[PaulSmenis]

I suggest for your own sake you bring yourself to a 21st century level of understanding of human genetics by taking a human evolution class at an accredited higher education college or university and you would realize there is no such thing as race, and that no race is smarter or better than any other.

Yes...(((real science))) from an (((accredited college))) or (((university))).

 

[Manletmancer]

Asians arent feminine looking. The most dom looking people i have seen have been asian

View attachment 72771

View attachment 72772


How many fat asians do you see? How many asians with man boobs are there? Wide hips? Hardly any. Now compare this to the west where every second guy is suffering from obesity and gyno. Asians dont get these problems because of high testosterone levels. In other words they are manly af.

Outlier

 

[Inceptorr]

Outlier

 

[RodgersSecondAdvent]

so the selection pressure for intelligence is the same all over the globe? If what you're saying is correct, that would obviously have to be the case. The selection pressure for intelligence in Africa where food is readily available all year around would have to be the same as it is in Europe where one had to know how to farm and plan for the winter in order to survive. Denying race is as silly as denying that man has evolved in disparate locations across the globe

Man, this is really stupid. The most intelligent species to roam on planet earth originated in Africa, the homo sapiens. That's not all, you have elephants who happen to be one of the most intelligent mammals that live in hot climates and Africa is also home to the African grey parrot, unarguably one of the smartest birds on the planet and you have dolphins who's habitat are primarily tropical waters.

 

[Deleted member 12355]

Man, this is really stupid. The most intelligent species to roam on planet earth originated in Africa, the homo sapiens. That's not all, you have elephants who happen to be one of the most intelligent mammals that live in hot climates and it's also home to the African grey parrot, unarguably one of the smartest birds on the planet and you have dolphins who's habitat are primarily tropical waters.

right, so the selection pressure for intelligence among humans is the same all across the globe then? That's absurd.

Yes...(((real science))) from an (((accredited college))) or (((university))).

he's just a smug negro. Let him cope by thinking he's high IQ tbh.

 

[Juxtaposition6]

They are ruined by their isolation. Sooner or later they will disappear from existence, because they are too weak and feminine.

Impossible, they are the most numerous in numbers, and they breed like rabbits in their home countries, with the exception of Japan of course, if there's any race going extinct it's europeans, low birthrates, willingly allowing hordes of migrants in and all of that, on top of being the smallest minority on earth, you see.

 

[Inceptorr]

Man, this is really stupid. The most intelligent species to roam on planet earth originated in Africa, the homo sapiens. That's not all, you have elephants who happen to be one of the most intelligent mammals that live in hot climates and Africa is also home to the African grey parrot, unarguably one of the smartest birds on the planet and you have dolphins who's habitat are primarily tropical waters.

Natural selection plays also a role asian foids choose smart men because that was needed for their survival black foids choose physic black men because that was needed for their survival. Keep coping

 

[RodgersSecondAdvent]

right, so the selection pressure for intelligence among humans is the same all across the globe then? That's absurd.

The hot climates are home to the largest biological diversity on planet earth.This isn't about some specific environment pressing for intelligence. You have many more factors to account for in evolutionary pressures. It's not something predictable.

 

[Deleted member 12355]

I'm just gonna tag @Ledgemund incase he happens to see this. I think he should tbh

 

[Salustio]

Impossible, they are the most numerous in numbers, and they breed like rabbits in their home countries, with the exception of Japan of course, if there's any race going extinct it's europeans, low birthrates, willingly allowing hordes of migrants in and all of that, on top of being the smallest minority on earth, you see.

Of course I was referring to japanesecels, a glorious population who gave us the most effective cope of all time, hentai and anime.

 

[Deleted member 12355]

The hot climates are home to the largest biological diversity on planet earth.This isn't about some specific environment pressing for intelligence. You have many more factors to account for in evolutionary pressures. It's not something predictable.

seems like jumping through a lot of hoops to not admit what should be readily obvious to any thinking adult with a solid grasp of evolution. The Minnesota transracial adoption study, which sadly is the last study of its kind and the only material we have to go by, has shown that the racial gap in intelligence between blacks and whites appear to be genetic. It sure would be great if we could further inquire into this subject to settle the score once in for all, but the politicized climate of universities simply wont allow for that to happen.

 

[Juxtaposition6]

Natural selection plays also a role asian foids choose smart men because that was needed for their survival black foids choose physic black men because that was needed for their survival. Keep coping

I've read that north and central asian body morphology is an adaption to the cold steppe and tundra environments, shorter limbs as compared to the trunk makes blood circulation much faster and keeps their extremities warm, also bigger hearts to pump more blood in in order to cope with the oxygen toxicity of very high altitudes.

Of course I was referring to japanesecels, a glorious population who gave us the most effective cope of all time, hentai and anime.

I see.

 

[RodgersSecondAdvent]

seems like jumping through a lot of hoops to not admit what should be readily obvious to any thinking adult with a solid grasp of evolution. The Minnesota transracial adoption study, which sadly is the last study of its kind and the only material we have to go by, has shown that the racial gap in intelligence between blacks and whites appear to be genetic. It sure would be great if we could further inquire into this subject to settle the score once in for all, but the politicized climate of universities simply wont allow for that to happen.

You alt-right idiots all sound the same. It's always the same studies and when I tell you that the researchers who conducted that same study don't agree with your conclusions, the answer amounts to something like : "it's the jews", "they only said this to keep their jobs".

Literally from the wikipedia page:

Waldman, Weinberg, and Scarr [9] responded to Levin [7] and Lynn.[8] They noted that the data taken of adoption placement effects can explain the observed differences; but that they cannot make that claim firmly because the pre-adoption factors confounded racial ancestry, preventing an unambiguous interpretation of the results. They also note that Asian data fit that hypothesis while being omitted by both Levin and Lynn. They argued that, "contrary to Levin's and Lynn's assertions, results from the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study provide little or no conclusive evidence for genetic influences underlying racial differences in intelligence and achievement, " and note that "We think that it is exceedingly implausible that these differences are either entirely genetically based or entirely environmentally based. The true causes of racial-group differences in IQ, or in any other characteristic, are likely to be too complex to be captured by locating them on a single hereditarianism-environmentalism dimension."[9]

 

[Deleted member 12355]

You alt-right idiots all sound the same. It's always the same studies and when I tell you that the researchers who conducted that same study don't agree with your conclusions, the answer amounts to something like : "it's the jews", "they only said this to keep their jobs".

Literally from the wikipedia page:

Waldman, Weinberg, and Scarr [9] responded to Levin [7] and Lynn.[8] They noted that the data taken of adoption placement effects can explain the observed differences; but that they cannot make that claim firmly because the pre-adoption factors confounded racial ancestry, preventing an unambiguous interpretation of the results. They also note that Asian data fit that hypothesis while being omitted by both Levin and Lynn. They argued that, "contrary to Levin's and Lynn's assertions, results from the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study provide little or no conclusive evidence for genetic influences underlying racial differences in intelligence and achievement, " and note that "We think that it is exceedingly implausible that these differences are either entirely genetically based or entirely environmentally based. The true causes of racial-group differences in IQ, or in any other characteristic, are likely to be too complex to be captured by locating them on a single hereditarianism-environmentalism dimension."[9]

who cares what the test conductors say? The results speak volumes on their own. Also, going by what they say, it seems that they agree with me more than they agree with you. I've never once claimed that it's wholly genetic, where as you've denied the possibility that it's genetic at all.

 

[RodgersSecondAdvent]

who cares what the test conductors say? The results speak volumes on their own. Also, going by what they say, it seems that they agree with me more than they agree with you. I've never once claimed that it's wholly genetic, where as you've denied the possibility that it's genetic at all.

There are the results and then there is an interpretation of the results. I put more trust in their authority than in someone who's clearly trying to push an agenda.

And you see they were responding to Lynn who agrees with you. The same Lynn who was caught manipulating data in research of his own to push his agenda.

 

[Deleted member 12355]

There are the results and then there is an interpretation of the results. I put more trust in their authority than in someone who's clearly trying to push an agenda.

And you see they were responding to Lynn who agrees with you. The same Lynn who was caught manipulating data in research of his own to push his agenda.

jfl at trusting someone's supposed authority when you can just look at the data yourself

 

[TheRealChincel]

Go the way of the dodo.

 

[Involuntarily]

Smart niggers exist, dumb chinks also exist. In fact, the Igbo of Nigeria are known for their cosmic IQ (comparable to jews). Wrong theory bro.

 

[RodgersSecondAdvent]

jfl at trusting someone's supposed authority when you can just look at the data yourself

In the hypothetical situation where I were to deepen myself in studying statistics and how to conduct research in order to adequately review the study with expertise from my part and I happened to make an interpretation that doesn't fit your beliefs, your response wouldn't be any different because ultimately you lack intellectual honesty.

 

[Deleted member 12355]

In the hypothetical situation I were to deepen myself in studying statistics and how to conduct research in order to adequately review the study with expertise from my part and I happened to make an interpretation that doesn't fit your beliefs, your response wouldn't be any different because ultimately you lack intellectual honesty.

hurrdurr you believe stuff and have researched the stuff you believe so you can't be trusted with commenting on it

 

[Michael15651]

They are ruined by their isolation. Sooner or later they will disappear from existence, because they are too weak and feminine.

 

[acnescarcel]

more masculine=less smart

 

[BeefRamen]

From a quick google search.



All humans are the same, and all have the same intelligence capacity. You are masquerading pseudo-science as real science. I actually have a background in anthropology so understand. The differences if there are any are insignificant and inconsequential to intelligence and does not explain the IQ scores between races. That's because there are cultural reasons why some races have IQ more than others. Because they have more opportunity than others do, blacks in the United States are marginalized while whites are privileged and receive higher quality education. The same can be said for Asians. No race is smarter than any other race.

I get the point you're trying to make. Intelligence can be considered somewhat subjective.

BUT you're fucking bullshitting yourself if you actually believe that black failures are caused by nothing more than culture and oppression. They are clearly an inferior race. You may have a few smart ones here and there, but I'm generalizing.

You know why black schools suck so much? It's because they have black teachers and students. My mother is an elementary teacher and all the black students have behavioral problems. I used to do pizza delivery and very few blacks were kind enough to tip. The one black female coworker we had was a total bitch who talked about sex constantly while overvaluing her ghetto self. Every lying problem customer we had was black or latino.

The majority of blacks vote for democratic politicians, and just fucking look at Detroit. They were given the same privileges as the rest of us and look at what the fuck happened.

Blacks are a primal race. Comparing them to whites is similar but not exactly the same as comparing a wolf to a domesticated dog. One acts on instinct and impulse without thinking about consequences and the other is friendly + significantly less violent. They may both be ""smart"", but it is clear by observation that blacks are an inferior race.

Even in strength they're inferior to whites.
http://theworldsstrongestman.com/worlds-strongest-man-archive/

We could also genocide the shit out of the black race but we choose not to.

 

[Mr Joyboy]

This is completely untrue. Homo-sapien as a species evolved to have higher intelligence as a result of increased brain size. The average Homo-sapien brain size is 1400cc, and this increase in brain size accounts for intelligence, not environmental factors. You are confusing cultural differences for intelligence differences, but all races have the same intelligence capacity as all are Homo-sapien.

Where do the selective pressures that favor intelligence come from, if not the environment?

The different races have different average brain sizes, and their women have correspondingly narrower or wider on average birth canals.

All dogs are "canis" and the same species but the also all have reliably distinct traits.

You're fucking stupid.

 

[SLAVICMorPheus]

Those are just cultural differences you're giving, not biological. Some races were able to develop agrarian societies while others had the environment that was more productive to hunting and gathering. It does not mean that one race is smarter than another, it only means they have different cultures. The selection pressure that led to the increase in brain size for Homo-sapiens already occurred 1000s of years ago, you are acting as if this is still going on. Evolutionary changes take 1000s and 1000 of years and human civilization as we know it is not nearly as old. You need a history class in addition to an evolution class.

Both of you knowitallcels are forgetting to take into account neuroplasticity. Unlike our genes our neurons can easily change its shape and hence change it's function. Brain is most malleable organ in the body. So this means a low iq Africancel can be trained into defeating a high iq Asiancel if he is trained from the early stage of malleability (I.e childhood).

there is no such thing as race, and that no race is smarter or better than any other.

Was agreeing with you until this point. There is racial difference. Caucasoids have higher Neanderthal DNA while sub Sharan Africans have none. Malenisian and Australoid non-humam apes have high level of Denisovan hominin DNA in them. If you don't mind me asking have you completed your degree ?

Asians arent feminine looking. Asians dont get these problems because of high testosterone levels. In other words they are manly af.

I have never seen this level of cope.
Asians are on soft diet mostly rice, thinly sliced meat and fish which are later steamed to make even softer. This lead to deterioration of hard and touch facial bones.
Secondly large amount of soy led to decrease in testosterone level. Thirdly selection pressure towards neotony has led to bear mode Changs being in disadvantage over pretty boy Fuang.

And lastly exceptions stands for Mongolian, Western Chinese and central asian steppe people as theor culture and climte both are quite different then oriental or eastern asian one. Even the Thais, malays etc. That have been influenced by Indian and Perso-Arabic culture have escaped the grim fate of feminity unlike east asian ones.

 

[Deleted member 2798]

All humans are the same

What?

I actually have a background in (())anthropology(())

Oh, got it.

 

[Disillusioned]

Yes...(((real science))) from an (((accredited college))) or (((university))).