I just see escorts as a tool to be thrown away once done. It’s all about perspective. It’s not like they’re redeemable.
You're still giving them money. You are still placing a value on them, and you're helping them survive and maintain their lifestyle. There is no justifying that fact, that they get money thrown at them just for the holes between their legs.
no it doesnt, it just proves the point that foids are whores. chads and tyrone use escorts as well when they didnt have to.
But you're throwing money at foids because of their biology.
i would argue the opposite
its not btw, you are paying for something tangible. its like paying to drive a real car vs paying to drive a car in forza.
everything has a price.
He is not getting it for free, he pays with his beauty.
escorting is not always piv, it can be girlfriend exerience or some other.
that is real sex, you taking a test drive is real driving even though you are not purchasing the car.
Foidw have low sex drive , thy dont want to fuck anything other than chads and dogs. it is only by force or resources that foids can be made to have sex with other men.
i wonder how you know that, and i cant verify it coz i havent escort yet. a quality escort can have wet cunny.An escort pussy will NEVER be as juicy and wet as a pussy that is actually attracted to you and wants to get POUNDED
no it wont , its a meat, there is no boob or booty. how do know that, did you fuck a meat.
which is infinitely better than wat normies do which is putting women on a pedestal. i just want to buy the hole
I say no, i am just doing buiness. and simps are the one that are paying money to look at foid through screen.
thats what they do, they are whores. its like you paying a fisherman to catch fish for you because they have tools like fishing rod.
tbh, an escort will give the best service to the good looking customer.
those high quality escorts are hired by old guys who are married and were chads themsef back in the day. they can afford the high price as being chad they get good earnings.
No, foids and sex have no monetary value in and of themselves.
Thank you , someone with some legitimate points. Onlyfans is simping , escorting isn’t simping it’s a tangible transaction.
Loyalty, honor, love, friendship. These are but a handful of things that conceptually have no price tag. You can put prices on these things, sure, but they become a facsimile of the real thing.
that's an administrative issue that normies bought it upon themselves. as a Blackpiller one need to find cope like escortceil to experience cunny as we know nor the foid voluntarily let us have sex with them or the govt will provide us with a foid.
its an administrative issue. i an not the one making societal norms. i did not ask foids to be whores, they rather be whores and fk dogs than be with an incel.
Honestly, I'd rather stay a virgin and jerk off than pay a whore just for quick sex and help sustain her livelihood. Either way, it isn't going to change my current situation before seeing the hooker only more broke.
People still buy food and pay a lot in rent.
And you pay for it with money you worked for? That is cucked
Yeah, that's the point of working.
If you have to work to live, you're already being cucked by the system and the corporations. If you're the one who owns the companies and pays people's wages, or if you're the one with the army and the police forces and you're taxing the people like the mafia that you are, then you're the one cucking everyone else.
You're still paying those people's wages so you have to give them something that benefits them or they don't work for you.
I don’t understand your point? Sounds like a cope. You want to be the person paying the wages while you make the majority of money. Here’s something also interesting, a lot of actors never have money or a atm card on them. Because when they go to places usually everything is free and they get treated like royalty.
Just statusmaxx and you don't have to use money to spend on anything ever again.
Look at jayz he’s ugly as fuck and it’s not because he’s black
He still has money and is a famous rapper.
I can see your point. You think that escortcelling will lead to less simping men.
@BlkPillPres sorry to trigger you butBecause:
Incels always complain about simps giving money to foids just because they're female, but escortceling is the exact same thing.
I would NEVER give my hard earned money to a foid just for having a vagene ... NEVER.
it's CUCKED.
Paying for something Chad gets for free is
CUCKED.
Paying a foid for nothing except having a Vagene is
CUCKED.,
Also:
Escort sex is not real sex.
Real sex involves 2 partners who want to fuck EACH OTHER.
An escort pussy will NEVER be as juicy and wet as a pussy that is actually attracted to you and wants to get POUNDED
You could fuck a microwaved meat loaf and it would be the exact same as fucking an escort, except the meat loaf is way cheaper.
Simping is categorically different than paying a prostitute, though. You're making the argument that a regular simp pays a hole with his time and attention, whereas the escortcel simp pays with his time and money.
The results are the same: Both versions of simping increase women smv. Therefore, there is no difference.
I don’t even want talk about giga simps who pay for e-whores, they are nothing but a joke to me. But imo every attention to a woman is wrong. Sure there are many kinds of simps but at the end, they are all simps. The escortcell as well as the OnlyFans contributer.
A streamer girl giving you a shoutout on stream or sending you a message is just as tangible imo. It's basically the same thing. You give a foid money so that she gives you attention. She spreading her legs for you is just one step further than the simping that's going on on twitch or social media.
How can you "pay" with beauty? Beauty is not a currency. He doesn't have less beauty after fucking her. It's not a currency , you can't pay with it. Stop coping and accept that he is not paying. He gets it for free because of his genetics.
Girlfriend experience from a foid that is NOT your girlfriend .... can't you see how retarded that concept is?
This comparison is extremely stupid, because cars don't have emotions. You humping a foid that doesn't have interest in you is not real sex. Real sex requires the foid to be attracted to you.
Cope, they have very high sex drive
A vagene gets juicy and wet because of arousal. Arousal only happens if the foid is into it. Not when a disgusting filthy incel is humping her. I think it's pretty obvious why an escort will never be as aroused as a real gf. She probably had 6 other clients before you, she will definitly not be aroused and wet. She's probably disgusted by you.
Egotistical and a moralfag, why am I not surprised at this combination lol. I'm not surprised because morality is INHERENTLY egotistical, as it involves asserting a "standard" that separates people who are "better than" from those who are "worse than" for not adhering to that standard. All moralfags are egoists by default due to that dynamic.
)Please go on and explain how:
No such thing as free sex for the large majority of men, you guys are too obsessed with Chad. Your father is pretty much a "John" and your mother a "Whore", pretty much all men are paying women for sex and/or companionship, it's been this way since the beginning of time. You can use mental gymnastics to rationalize your childish disposition but your logic is wrong.
Why do you keep purposefully wording your description of this so that it excludes the fact that you are getting sex. I always find it weird that you guys do this, and all it shows that you are self aware enough to know that the argument is ridiculous, else you'd be very specific.
99% of your ancestors never had "real sex" then, because most marriages in the past were arranged and even forced, and women didn't have any resources or rights so they didn't really have much of a choice when it comes to who they married, or whether they had sex or not so a lot of rape happened too.Also:
Escort sex is not real sex.
Real sex involves 2 partners who want to fuck EACH OTHER.
An escort pussy will NEVER be as juicy and wet as a pussy that is actually attracted to you and wants to get POUNDED
You could fuck a microwaved meat loaf and it would be the exact same as fucking an escort, except the meat loaf is way cheaper.
incels.is
Paying foids for their biology is cucked, period.Egotistical and a moralfag, why am I not surprised at this combination lol. I'm not surprised because morality is INHERENTLY egotistical, as it involves asserting a "standard" that separates people who are "better than" from those who are "worse than" for not adhering to that standard. All moralfags are egoists by default due to that dynamic.
Bonus points for the blue pilled "I'm looking for a special woman" part lol, who really gives a fuck what "type" a woman is when your only goal is to fuck her? (don't tell me you still think you are going to have this white picket fence wife + kids future one day?
Please go on and explain how:
A man going to strip club and paying a woman TO NOT FUCK HIM
A man paying a woman on only fans TO NOT FUCK HIM
Etc, etc, etc
Is "the exact same thing" as:
A man paying a woman TO FUCK HIM
There's a clear and obvious difference, I swear sometimes I think you guys have legit brain defects, because this is too obvious to miss, either that or you are just being dishonest and pretending, so you are either an idiot or disingenuous
When a simp gives a woman money BASED ON HER SEXUALITY but he DOES NOT GET SEX, he is essentially paying that woman TO NOT FUCK HIM
An "escortcel" gives a woman money BASED ON HER SEXUALITY but he DOES GET SEX
YOUR ARGUMENT IS AS RETARDED AS SAYING THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHARITY AND BUYING SOMETHING FOR YOURSELF
No such thing as free sex for the large majority of men, you guys are too obsessed with Chad. Your father is pretty much a "John" and your mother a "Whore", pretty much all men are paying women for sex and/or companionship, it's been this way since the beginning of time. You can use mental gymnastics to rationalize your childish disposition but your logic is wrong.
The exception to the rule doesn't make the rule
Why do you keep purposefully wording your description of this so that it excludes the fact that you are getting sex. I always find it weird that you guys do this, and all it shows that you are self aware enough to know that the argument is ridiculous, else you'd be very specific.
Notice not one of you ever says "paying a woman to fuck her is CUCKED", it's always some weird "abstract" way of wording it so that sex isn't even part of the description.
It's like describing buying bread at a bakery as - "I'd never pay someone for nothing except owning an oven, that's CUCKED".
You left out the "getting bread without having to bake it yourself" part.
Seems like you are leaving out the important part on purpose so you can cope with the fact that you are cucking yourself out of pleasure lol.
99% of your ancestors never had "real sex" then, because most marriages in the past were arranged and even forced, and women didn't have any resources or rights so they didn't really have much of a choice when it comes to who they married, or whether they had sex or not so a lot of rape happened too.
So here's the question I always have to ask you guys:
If your ancestors who were clearly more masculine than you didn't care about "mutual attraction", why should you?
All you are doing is trying to assert modern day "feminized masculinity" as "the real masculine standard", and it isn't. There is nothing masculine about getting laid because a woman finds you attractive, that's the exact opposite. For pretty much all mammals the male competes against another male and the females SUBMIT to the victor, it has nothing to do with whether or not they think he's "hot", they don't have a choice.
A lot of what we call mammalian "mating rituals" would be considered "rape" if viewed under a human context.
Go look up any video for deers, or apes, or gorillas, or hippos, or anything really. The male fights another male, and the one that survives or doesn't run off gets the female or a harem of females.
Human beings evolved and took that into the next step of men basically selling off their daughters for a bride price, or buying a slave to be their wife, or raiding a village and taking a woman as your own by force, etc, etc. In the same way that we innovated hunting and started farming animals. But the core fundamental thing was that you got a woman not based on her judgements but based on your actions, and she had to submit to that will.
You guys are promoting "feminized masculinity" like it's actually masculine, but it isn't.
[Hard To Swallow Edition] The Greatest Trick Society Ever Pulled Was Convincing Men To Adhere To A Feminized Standard Of Masculinity & Be Proud Of It
Ever heard of this quote: "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist" Well here's the thing, society has basically done this to men, and many men (ironically even so called "black pilled" incels) don't seem to be aware of this. Even though its right in...
Based on what standard?
So you'd never pay for a date then?
Because why pay for sex as an incel if ugly landwhales, subaverage and bottom-tier foids and midget turbofoidlets still have free sex with a decent looking guy? Foids don't even have to try yet we have to pay an escort.Based on what standard?
Have you guy forgot history?
Bride price?
Slave trade?
Look at recent times, what the hell is "dating" other than paying a woman FOR A CHANCE to MAYBE get her to fuck you?
The scary thing is, a lot of you guys speak as if normies are so "illogical" and "blue pilled", but you guys don't base your arguments on logic either. It's just a knee jerk reaction as a result of your ego.
If I asked any one of you guys if you would "date" an attractive woman you'd agree without hesitation.
I never said anything about the sex being guaranteed, you get the PRIVILEGE to pay for a woman's food, drinks, entertainment, transportation, etc, THAT'S IT.
Yet without hesitation you guys would jump at that chance with no second thought, and what you are literally doing is "paying foids for their biology"
Stop pretending like you actually have standards or you are using logic
ALL OF THIS JUST COMES DOWN TO EGO
You see one method of paying for sex as allowing you to have "plausible deniability" so you can cope (dating), because it's INDIRECT.
You see the other method of paying for sex as "cucked" because it doesn't allow you to stroke your ego, and it doesn't allow you to cope and play mental gymnastics games with yourself DIRECT.
With dating you can PRETEND like you aren't paying for sex because it's INDIRECT, with prostitution there is no ambiguity or games because its DIRECT.
So you'd never pay for a date then?
How is that not volcel?
The sad thing is you guys keep repeating the same flawed arguments because you go with your gut feeling, you don't even take a few minutes to think the logic through and apply it to other things to see if it makes sense.
incels.is
Don't trigger him, man.
