So not wanting to see a animal get tortured = bluepilled normie?
What an amazing comparison, are you mentally fit enough to be on here?
nobody's saying it's ok to attack an animal. but waterboarding a cat for 15 minutes and then never doing that shit again isn't the worst thing in the world. if someone did that to a human, you guys would be like "well it's a long time ago who cares"
Was I the only one who made a comment that wasn’t moralfagging? Also that faggot should get banned. He is an actual cuck. I can’t believe this forum tolerated moralfagging and agecuckoldry
moralfags and agecucks literally sound like IT-fags
A cow, pig, or chicken will never maul you. A dog is more likely to maul you than those animals, but people still like dogs more.
I'm not saying kids who smack cats should be severely punished, but they should be told that what they're doing is wrong. Animals can't make police reports or defend themselves, so if someone is caught abusing one people think "how long have they been abusing them?". I agree that weak men should be defended when they get abused by stronger men, but normies are hypocritical cucks. I treat all animals nicely, even weaker men, but normies only care about cats and dogs and human foids.
All animal should be treated nicely.
i don't think animal abuse is ok, nor do i think smacking one is ok, but normies seem to think that simply smacking a cat is equivalent to beheading a cat with a chainsaw or something. i could violently beat someone into a hospital and later on i'm forgiven by society, but the most mild attack on a cat is considered unforgivable and equivalent to murdering newborn babies.
It’s pure social conditioning and moralfagging. Is this way of thinking even common outside the West? People are fine with violence against humans but blow their lids when some dumb animal gets hit. It’s especially ironic when I see it happen on here. Every thread with violence against an animal has at least one retard say “That’s cruel, you should do this to a foid instead!”. I call out these hypocrites whenever I see them and they just get buttblasted.
The hypocrisy regarding most of these animal lovers doesn’t stop there, the majority of them even eat meat! The conditions animals go through for our consumption in the West is horrible but no one besides the heavily lambasted vegans care about that. In fact people hate vegans because vegans keep reminding them of their hypocrisy! Some CEO of some engineering firm recently got cancelled for lightly hitting his dog for peeing on carpet. Meanwhile the animal product consuming normies who cancelled him support industries that are doing FAR worse to animals than what he did.
My gripe isn’t that people are upset about animals being hurt, it’s their incredible inconsistencies regarding violence. Instead of utilizing reason they’ll just appeal to emotion and call you a psychopath...
high IQ. normies are hypocrites and they think lightly hitting a dog is equivalent to beheading a dog with a chainsaw
There's always this grossly incorrect assumption that's inserted that whoever finds animal abuse repugnant somehow finds the same kind of abuse towards other humans perfectly acceptable. Where the fuck is this coming from?
You gripe about inconsistencies, yet you make the error of assuming every other moral stance based on one thing.
if Total imbecile said that long ago he violently beat a man into a hospital but regrets it, people here would either say "based" or anything more neutral. but he waterboarded a cat for 15 minutes, never did it again and it was 8 years ago, and people be like "dis is y u inkwell" and they act like he murdered an infant.
i remember a little kid named Preston McDuffie was doxxed and the internet threatened to brutally murder him and publicly hang him because he closed the door on a cat's tail, they even praised his landwhale sister for tying Preston up and taping his mouth shut and beating Preston. if Preston beat the shit out of a human, the internet would just shrug.
An animal is a lower form of being than a human.
Human beings are designed to eat all sorts of animals and hunt for food.
What's the difference of killing animal for fun and for food?
The animal still dies, you just don't eat it.
At worst, it's a waste of resources.
Plus, animals have lower cognition and very different brain structures from human beings.
Many animals have less advanced central nervous systems and cannot feel pain to the same extent.
Also, animals kill each other cruelly all the time.
We also anthromorphize animals too much.
Just because an animal looks like it feels pain (it spazzes out and starts thrashing) doesn't mean it's feeling pain.
There are reflexes in the brain that automate movement to try to escape in response to certain stimuli.
It's the same issue as when you look at a dog's face and think it feels guilty when it doesn't.
Also, there is literally no disadvantage to human beings when animals feel pain. Nothing in the world changes for the worse.
I think feeling too much sympathy for animals leads to evil ideologies like PETA has.
HIGH IQ.
Because most people are worth less then a piece of shit, (most) animals on the other hand are not.
Because most people have done bad things or treated me badly, animals on the other hand have not.
Nobody here is claiming to be PETA and advocating for animal rights or whatever, but it's not like we are blithering psychopaths that want to kill every animal for no reason either. Point is if you kill an animal, kill it for food or self defence, kill it for an actual need. Don't torture, toy and kill the thing for fun or because you're fucked in the head.
waterboarding some cat is about as bad as maybe beating the shit outta a human, maybe less severe than that. but if total imbecile violently beat someone, people here would've said "eh it was a long time ago"
Exactly. This is all there is to it. But say you find the torture of animals disgusting and you'll get called a moralfag and, ironically, the people calling you that are employing the same reasoning (or lack thereof) that blue pilled normies use. That is, they slap you with every label under the sun based on one moral position, like if you say you find sexually developed 15 year olds attractive and suddenly, out of left field, you're a rapist, a serial killer, and a pedophile.... lolwut.
you aren't a moralfag for opposing animal abuse. you're a moralfag for acting like as if waterboarding some cat (who did fine later) is an unforgivable crime like as if he murdered a little kid or something. it wasn't the worst thing in the world. and he didn't do it again.
There's a quote in harry potter that stuck with me. Judge a man not by how they treat their peers but by how they treat their lessers.
By abusing animals, you are just announcing to the world you are okay with abusing the lesser. So that means they'll do that shit to me if given the chance.
this is a logical fallacy called appeal to false authority. some harry potter quote doesn't mean shit. also, i could say that dwayne johnson beating some small guy is abusing the lesser yet people would later forgive dwayne for it but you could merely smack some cat and people act like you murdered a toddler. what total imbecile did was a long time ago, and it wasn't that fucking horrible compared to much worse abuse. get over it.
A weak animal will almost never attack you first.
If there's other healthy food available it's not a good reason to kill them for food either. I haven't eaten meat in almost 10 years.
cats sometimes scratch first
I hate that people are saying I hurt the cat or even worse abused or tortured it
It was literally pouring some water over its head and probably the towel absorbed most of it
Reminder that there are ADULTS who declaw cats, hack their paws off and set them on fire
Id never legit injure an animal, I was just a pissed off teenager who thought "fuck you cat for scratching me Ill show you"
what you did was horrible but it wasn't extremely horrible like killing or something
