www.businessinsider.com
there's all these whores but in all honestly i've never met one or spoken to one. Sure I can see whore walkin around in a mall or a beach. Im sure these whores have to dress up a bit if they are gonna work normally for a bit. But I've never even crossed paths with a whore lookin whore on whore mode.
They are pretty good at masking their whoredom.
have you ever crossed paths with a fucking slut and socially interacted with them in any capacity outside glances?
If you're talking about those bimbo retards, no. But I have crossed paths with "normal-looking" foids who are gigawhores in private.
Initially thought about adding more context but then figured if keeping it ambiguous would result in a predictable reply.
Gen Z went into sex work as a shortcut to the American dream. Those days are gone.
A brutal job market drove Gen Zers into sex work for better pay. Now strip clubs are struggling, wages are down, and some don't see a way out.
these bitches need to find God and pump out incel babies
As much as I’d much rather live in a society where toilets stay home and be loyal wives, economically they have been a huge benefit to the economy and job market. Increasing labor participation boosts GDP
India has the fourth largest GDP in the world, yet most of its population cannot afford any luxury spending.
India is still richer than many African countries that only have a few million people. The U.S has over 100x the population of Equitoral Guinea. The U.S is the richest nation on the planet while Equitorial Guinea is the poorest.
Jobs aren’t a limited resource, as more people work and earn money, spending and investment goes up and that creates more jobs.
their share of the economy has gone down. Rockefeller held 3% of GDP in his prime. Richest man in the world Musk holds 1.2% of the GDP
“Muh GDP”! Sure you’re going to die a lonely incel and all the women you could have families with in the past are now single mom prostitutes on onlyfans. Sure it’s impossible to get a job to support yourself because we flooded the market with women and immigrants and you’re now a stranger in your own country but the GDP is higher!!!! This accounting equation made by a Jewish economist in the 1930s is higher because we let women work! That means your life is better goy!!! Don’t believe your own eyes look at this statistic I made up! You can consume more that means your life is better!!!!
I literally just said I’d rather Toilets be in the kitchen for social reasons, but economically it’s better if they work.“Muh GDP”! Sure you’re going to die a lonely incel and all the women you could have families with in the past are now single mom prostitutes on onlyfans. Sure it’s impossible to get a job to support yourself because we flooded the market with women and immigrants and you’re now a stranger in your own country but the GDP is higher!!!! This accounting equation made by a Jewish economist in the 1930s is higher because we let women work! That means your life is better goy!!! Don’t believe your own eyes look at this statistic I made up! You can consume more that means your life is better!!!!
you: dont get a wife and mother of your kids bcuz she can work herself STRANG WAMIN NEED NO MAN“Muh GDP”! Sure you’re going to die a lonely incel and all the women you could have families with in the past are now single mom prostitutes on onlyfans. Sure it’s impossible to get a job to support yourself because we flooded the market with women and immigrants and you’re now a stranger in your own country but the GDP is higher!!!! This accounting equation made by a Jewish economist in the 1930s is higher because we let women work! That means your life is better goy!!! Don’t believe your own eyes look at this statistic I made up! You can consume more that means your life is better!!!!
Doesn't the increase in Gysh contribute more to the upper classes than to the average person? A similar situation applies to immigrants. They contribute to Gysh but now people have lower purchasing power, especially in places like housing.
Yes I do deny your premise that increasing the labor force with foids and immigrants has raised my wages or anybody else’s. What you’re saying makes no sense. The more labor in the economy means lower wages for the workers has the glut of labor gives each marginal worker less bargaining power as they are more replaceable. Any additional profits that employers get by the labor glut typically go back into stock buybacks and not into efficiency wages or product investment
No, productivity gains help the lower classes more than the upper class. The quality of life for the bottom level worker has increased tenfold from the early 1800s... the life of the top aristocrat has marginally improved.
That makes absolutely zero sense. Labor does not have diminishing marginal returns. More labor allows for more specialization and focus on comparative advantage which boosts average and marginal productivity, allowing workers to bargain for higher wages. One person on an island trying to grow food, keep shelter, and stay alive would be far far far less productive than an island with 100 people where each individual can focus on a specific task. An island with 100 people working together will yield a higher quality of life (wage) per person compared to an island with 1 person on it. More people allows productivity to exceed the sum of parts.
Stock buybacks do go into investment. When a company repurchases its own stock, it buys the stock from investors. Those investors now have more cash, and they invest that cash somewhere else. The stock market efficiently allocates this capital to where it's most efficient by providing higher returns to investors who invest their capital where it's most optimal.
WTF? Do you have a problem with reading comprehension? What's the point of comparing countries? You proposed country GDP = great economy. I countered with India as an extreme example. So, your grand counter was a fallacious comparison. I'm sure millions of Mumbai slum inhabitants would sleep peacefully knowing there are people doing even worse than them.
There are way more billionaires now. Then you take into account the federal reserves. Your GDP means shit when eggs cost 5 dollars. Your GDP means shit when your medical bills cost a kidney.
That's human advancement sparked by a few geniuses. That has nothing to do with throwing more people in the meat grinder. Lower classes of 1800s were better off than lower classes of the past eras.
India's GDP per capita is very low.
And fastfood workers are paid MUCH more than they were in the past. McDonalds is hiring people for $18/hour now, in the 80s many were paid only $4/hour.
Hyperbole doesn't make your point stronger, you can buy a dozen for $7 in most citymarts.
Then lets focus on that issue rather than try to make things even worse with bad economic policies.
The geniuses needed people to work to make their ideas come to fruition. Henry Ford's factory wouldn't have done what it did without an army of humans to work in the factories. We need people working, people producing, people being employed to make use of the technologies at our disposal.
No wonder a capitalistic piece of shit is your idea of a genius.
He is, he was the Elon Musk of his day.
pinatamaxxing, im all for it!Hang them up by the rafters and hit them with baseball bats till candy pops out
wtf, they talk about this like they seriously believe it's an actual career
