Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Theory Who are the lords who rule the goyim?

nessahan alita

nessahan alita

Banned
-
Joined
Feb 6, 2021
Posts
36
First of all, states, nations, governments and continents do not rule. The bosses are the individuals and groups that control them. Before geopolitics comes tout court politics. And then everything gets complicated formidably. It is easy to see which states or countries prevail over others. But finding out who really rules in one state or country — and through it in others — is a more daunting intellectual challenge than the usual political analyst can imagine.

The verb “command” comes from the Latin manus dare: the commander lends his means of action (his “hand”) to others to do something he has thought. A ruler gives orders to his subordinates, but upon closer examination you will see that only very rare rulers in history — a Napoleon, a Stalin, a Reagan — were themselves the creators of the ideas they came up with. Early theorists of the modern state got it right when they invented the term “executive power”: the man of government is usually the executor of ideas that he did not conceive of, nor would he have the ability — or the time — to conceive. And those who conceived these ideas were the same ones who gave him the means to reach the government to realize them. Who are they?

Applying the question to the specific case of the United States, the sociologist Charles Wright Mills, one of the New Left mentors, published in 1956 the book that would become a classic: The Power Elite. The answer he found took the form of a complicated plot of groups, families, businesses, official and unofficial secret services, sects, clubs, churches, and ostentatious and discreet personal relationship circles, including lovers and call girls. The political class, which culminated in the person of the nominal ruler, appeared there as the foam on the surface of dark waters. Mills was obviously on the right track. But he died in 1962 and did not have the opportunity to witness a phenomenon that he himself helped produce: the New Left itself became the power elite and lost all interest in “transparency.” On the contrary: it has worked its opacity to the point of having placing a complete stranger in the presidency of the most powerful country in the world and surrounding it with a protective wall that blocks every attempt to find out who it is, what it has done, who it is with, and what interests it represents. If you want an idea of what the power elite is doing in the United States, you need to look for information at the other end of the ideological spectrum: conservatives are the current heirs to the tradition of study inaugurated by Wright Mills.

It is thanks to them that today the fabian globalist elite, the living nucleus of power behind virtually all western governments, has become visible in its composition and in details of its modus operandi to the point of near obscenity, involuntarily comical the insistence of some in calling it “secret power”. Press enter on google for the words “Council on Foreign Relations” , “Bilderberg” , “Trilateral” and the like, and you will get more information than your neurons will be able to process over the next ten years — information whose level of credibility ranges from scientific evidence to top-down invention.

By contrast, little or almost nothing is known about the deep sources of power in Russia, China, and the Islamic countries. Even the descriptions we have of the visible ruling class in these regions of the globe are schematic and superficial, without comparison to the meticulous Who’s Who of the western elite. This is easily explained by the difference in access to information sources. It is one thing to search western archives and libraries, under the protection of democratic laws and institutions, and even in the US to break through the barrier of official ill through the Freedom of Information Act. It is completely different in trying to guess what is passing behind the impenetrable walls of the Russian-Chinese establishment.

Neither the KGB nor China’s intelligence services have ever given access to independent researchers. Even the archives of the USSR Communist Party closed again after a brief period of tolerance, motivated not by any sudden love of freedom, but by the illusory conviction, soon denied, that western researchers were mostly sympathetic to the Soviet regime.

In the Islamic world, beneath the ruling class and the clutter of terrorist groups stretches an unfathomable network of esoteric organizations, some millennials, whose power of influence is vastly varied from country to country and from time to time. These organizations, which constitute the spiritual core of Islam, the profound assurance of its civilizational unity and, in the long run, the condition for the possibility of worldwide Islamic expansion, remain perfectly unknown to western political analysts, journalists or even scholars.

The difference in visibility between the big contending globalist schemes is a source of catastrophic errors in describing the power conflict in the world.

So, the historical forces that today dispute the power in the world are articulated in three projects of global domination: the "Russian-Chinese" (or "Eurasian"), the "Western" (sometimes mistakenly called "Anglo-American") and the "Islamic".

Each has a well-documented history, showing its remote origins, the changes it has undergone over time and the current state of its implementation.

The agents who personify them are respectively:

1. The ruling elite of Russia and China, especially the secret services of these two countries.

2. The Western financial elite, as represented especially in the Bilderberg Club, the Council of Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission.

3. The Muslim Brotherhood, the religious leaders of various Islamic countries and some governments of Muslim countries.

Of these three agents, only the first can be conceived in strictly geopolitical terms, since their plans and actions correspond to well-defined national and regional interests. The second, which is more advanced in achieving its world government plans, explicitly places itself above any national interests, including those of the countries where it originated and which serve as its base of operations. In the third, eventual conflicts of interest between national governments and the ultimate goal of the Universal Caliphate are always resolved in favor of the latter, which today is the great factor of ideological unification in the Islamic world.

The conceptions of global power that these three agents strive to achieve are very different from each other because they spring from heterogeneous and sometimes incompatible inspirations.

Although in principle the relations between them are of competition and dispute, sometimes even military, there are immense areas of fusion and collaboration, although mobile and changing. This phenomenon disorients observers, producing all sorts of misplaced and fanciful interpretations, some in the form of "conspiracy theories", others as "realistic" and "scientific" soi disant challenges to these theories.

Much of the cloudiness of the world picture is produced by a more or less constant factor: each of the three agents tends to interpret the plans and actions of the other two in their own terms, partly for propaganda purposes, partly out of genuine incomprehension.

The strategic analyzes from each side reflect, each one, the ideological bias that is proper to it. Although trying to take into account the totality of available factors, the Russian-Chinese scheme favors the geopolitical and military point of view, the western one the economic point of view, the Islamic the dispute of religions.

This difference reflects, in turn, the sociological composition of the dominant classes in the respective geographical areas:

1. Coming from the Communist Nomenklatura, the Russian-Chinese ruling class is essentially made up of bureaucrats, intelligence agents and military officers.

2. The predominance of international financiers and bankers in the Western establishment is too well known for it to be necessary to insist on this.

3. In the various countries of the Islamic complex, the authority of the ruler depends substantially on the approval of umma - the multitudinous community of categorized interpreters of traditional religion. Although there are a wide variety of internal situations there, it is not an exaggeration to describe the dominant power structure as "theocratic".

Thus, for the first time in the history of the world, the three essential modalities of power - political-military, economic and religious - are embodied in distinct supranational blocks, each with its own plans for world domination and its peculiar modes of action. This does not mean that each one does not act on all fronts, but only that their respective historical and strategic visions are ultimately delimited by the type of power they represent. It is no exaggeration to say that the world today is the subject of a dispute between the military, bankers and preachers.

Virtually all the analyzes of international politics available today in the media in America or in any other country reflect the subservience of "opinion makers" to one of the three currents in dispute, and therefore the systematic ignorance of their areas of complicity and mutual aid. These individuals judge facts and "take positions" based on the abstract values that are dear to them, without even asking if their words, in the general sum of factors at play in the world, will not end up contributing to the glory of everything they hate. The strategists of the three major world projects are well aware of this, and include political commentators - journalistic or academic - among the most precious useful idiots to their service.
 
OP is a giga low iq essay posting cuck and also a tranny (look at his profile comments :lul: :lul:)
 
shii410
 
read everything
 
I think that this is a great discussion to have and I will be monitoring this thread closely.
 
Black or over.
 
JFL at bluepillers who live every day willfully ignorant that nearly every facet of the modern world is safely in the hands of a small concern with unimaginable power who operate to inscrutable ends.
 
to lazy to read all of that but I'm going to assume you have a above room temp IQ.
TLDR: capitalists Zionist jews
 
Gas the jews.
 
scratching a bit at the surface there but sure. the idea of the 3 camps is pretty relevant because it reflects the only kind of cultural differences that is still able to shine through in a global synchronisation process. different flavor of the same jewish cocktail i guess.
 
to lazy to read all of that but I'm going to assume you have a above room temp IQ.
TLDR: capitalists Zionist jews
i did iq test, at skool and my skore was negitive 83.
 
deep state is real. i will replay later with more information about the situation of middle-east.
 
Like george bush Jr who is a member of yale skulls & bones once sayeth.

They cant tell you what secret groups they are in unless they kill you also to keep it a secret.
 
imagine actually reading all that @PLA1092 , couldn't be me :feelskek:
 
imagine actually reading all that @PLA1092 , couldn't be me :feelskek:
Only spent 2 days on here as well and then either got banned or dipped... :feelshehe:

Why even go to the effort of creating this all (unless he stole it from some SFcel forum)? :feelsjuice:
 

Similar threads

Shaktiman
Replies
10
Views
537
SoycuckGodOfReddit
SoycuckGodOfReddit
Vitarius
Replies
15
Views
274
Uggo Mongo
Uggo Mongo
copemaxx9002
Replies
4
Views
195
copemaxx9002
copemaxx9002
CruxGammata
Replies
14
Views
524
based_meme
B
SecularNeo-Khazar
Replies
11
Views
254
juche necromancer
juche necromancer

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top