Serious White Suburban Americans Remind me of Foids

[Intellectual]

1) Feel victimized but receive all the privileges

2) Think the system is slanted against them when they are the biggest and most privileged benefactors of the system

3) Believe they are economically disadvantaged (foid wage gap myth) when they are actually the most economically privileged group (Western law favors workers over employers 1000x)

4) Attempt to censor any criticism of them

5) Demand other people be sacrificed for their comfort and lifestyle

 

[Intellectual]

The only “suburban americans” are boomers. Nobody else can afford a house in this god forsaken shithole

Investment bankers, software engineers, etc.

 

[Intellectual]

Wrong.

How is that wrong?

 

[Intellectual]

You think all those houses are owned by people working .00001% of jobs? Boomers had houses from the beginning. They couldve worked at mcdonalds and bought a fucking house

That's a myth, besides, buying a house is not a good investment. It's a good thing if banks are preventing young people from taking out loans and buying them.

 

[Intellectual]

You have to be 18 to post here kid.

>boomers could buy a house on a part time job, I read it on the interwebzzzz

You know the 1960s were known for having giant slums right? Lyndon Johnson had to declare war on poverty because it was getting so bad. People back then struggled more than you could ever have imagined.

 

[Intellectual]

take your meds schizo

You're in the easiest time in history to make money. Stop the whining,

Ironically, the fact that foids are so hard to get is proof of that, in hard times foids are doing much worse because there's less money for simps to splurge on them.

 

[52baldcurryjanitor]

You're in the easiest time in history to make money. Stop the whining,

Ironically, the fact that foids are so hard to get is proof of that, in hard times foids are doing much worse because there's less money for simps to splurge on them.

not really due to an aging population/low birth rate you don't HAVE a customer base to sell goods/services too. The only good business would cater to boomers and would be medical based.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

1) Feel victimized but receive all the privileges

2) Think the system is slanted against them when they are the biggest and most privileged benefactors of the system

3) Believe they are economically disadvantaged (foid wage gap myth) when they are actually the most economically privileged group (Western law favors workers over employers 1000x)

4) Attempt to censor any criticism of them

5) Demand other people be sacrificed for their comfort and lifestyle

Funniest random hate thread I’ve seen jfl. @Transcended Trucel thoughts on the suburb hate?

 

[Intellectual]

not really due to an aging population/low birth rate you don't HAVE a customer base to sell goods/services too. The only good business would cater to boomers and would be medical based.

There is always a customer base because there's always money. There's more money now than there was back then and thus more spending.

 

[lifefuel]

If you want to understand white privilege and why it's a byproduct of their inferiority, all you have to do is look at foid privilege. They are pretty much perfectly paralleled.

 

[52baldcurryjanitor]

There is always a customer base because there's always money. There's more money now than there was back then and thus more spending.

aborted babies can't be customers. In a declining birth rate the customer base shrinks. Why was it so easy to make money in the 1950s? Because you had a high birth rate/growing customer base kids/families consume the most. All a business is is providing goods and services to PEOPLE. If your women are not birthing PEOPLE you can't make money simple as that!

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

5) Demand other people be sacrificed for their comfort and lifestyle

She isn't tired. Doug was sacrificed by our supporters.

 

[Murder Mario]

aborted babies can't be customers. In a declining birth rate the customer base shrinks. Why was it so easy to make money in the 1950s? Because you had a high birth rate/growing customer base kids/families consume the most. All a business is is providing goods and services to PEOPLE. If your women are not birthing PEOPLE you can't make money simple as that!

High IQ.

 

[Intellectual]

aborted babies can't be customers. In a declining birth rate the customer base shrinks.

But there's less people to compete with for jobs. Also, we may have a declining birthrate but the population is still going up due to immigration.

Why was it so easy to make money in the 1950s? Because you had a high birth rate/growing customer base kids/families consume the most.

Due to immigration we have the same phenomena.

All a business is is providing goods and services to PEOPLE. If your women are not birthing PEOPLE you can't make money simple as that!

But there's more people now than there were back then.

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

Racism = No Parent

 

[52baldcurryjanitor]

But there's less people to compete with for jobs.

Yeah but what does it matter? Their are NO jobs! Its like saying "well in a desert their is less competition for water" as everyone is dying/dropping dead lol

Also, we may have a declining birthrate but the population is still going up due to immigration.

You cud try to market to immigrants but most spics are racist and only do business with themselves no lame ass white bois like us

Due to immigration we have the same phenomena.

But there's more people now than there were back then.

no i think their are less. Sure their are "more" people but its old dying boomers. I guess you cud capitalize in the medical industry tho. But I don't wanna wipe asses

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

I guess you cud capitalize in the medical industry tho.

Don't bother. You'll see why later.

 

[Intellectual]

Yeah but what does it matter? Their are NO jobs!

There's always work to be done, you think we've solved every problem?

Its like saying "well in a desert their is less competition for water" as everyone is dying/dropping dead lol

Bro, in a society with 10 people, there is still a use for those 10 people. There would still be WORK to do. I don't know why you think less people means less jobs.

You cud try to market to immigrants but most spics are racist and only do business with themselves no lame ass white bois like us

Mexicans don't buy clothing? They don't eat at McDonalds, buy Airpods, car insurance? Cars, use Instagram, etc?

no i think their are less. Sure their are "more" people but its old dying boomers. I guess you cud capitalize in the medical industry tho. But I don't wanna wipe asses

The nurses who are whipping asses will spend their money on stuff.

 

[Transcended Trucel]

Funniest random hate thread I’ve seen jfl. @Transcended Trucel thoughts on the suburb hate?

OP is mostly correct. Housing prices are only as high as they are in the USA/Cuckstralia/Canada because of boomers owning these suburban homes refusing to build more housing.

Absolute fucking scum.Did you know Australia is the size of the continental USA, yet housing crisis there is even worse. Purely due to filthy boomers blocking housing development.

Same thing applies to public transportation and various other services.

 

[Transcended Trucel]

The only “suburban americans” are boomers. Nobody else can afford a house in this god forsaken shithole

Indeed. Maybe 10 years ago it was possible. aat this point borderline impossible now. you either own a house or you'll never.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

OP is mostly correct. Housing prices are only as high as they are in the USA/Cuckstralia/Canada because of boomers owning these suburban homes refusing to build more housing.

Absolute fucking scum.Did you know Australia is the size of the continental USA, yet housing crisis there is even worse. Purely due to filthy boomers blocking housing development.

Same thing applies to public transportation and various other services.

Why are they blocking housing development?

 

[Intellectual]

Why are they blocking housing development?

Because they're NIMBYs who don't want anyone else living near them.

 

[lifefuel]

If you want to understand white privilege and why it's a byproduct of their inferiority, all you have to do is look at foid privilege. They are pretty much perfectly paralleled.

Also notice how they cling to it while also denying its existence? Straight from the foid playbook.

If the caucusoid crimes against humanity weren't so flagrant, history would be revised to make them look like the victims, trust. Just like feminists say women were oppressed.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Because they're NIMBYs who don't want anyone else living near them.

Most the retards (at least on reddit) who demand more housing want properties to become divided more like they are in shit hole countries of the world, so they are cheaper. They don’t want actual expansion outwards due to environmental concerns. They want everyone packed into stacked boxes or tiny little shoebox sized places.

 

[Transcended Trucel]

Why are they blocking housing development?

More housing means lower property prices, more people flowing in. But in some cases, more blacks and more crime. Regardless it is disgusting they oppose housing Development then go ahead and bitch at their kids for not moving out.

 

[Intellectual]

Most the retards (at least on reddit) who demand more housing want properties to become divided more like they are in shit hole countries of the world, so they are cheaper. They don’t want actual expansion outwards due to environmental concerns. They want everyone packed into stacked boxes or tiny little shoebox sized places.

And that's how it should be. The idea that somebody would want an entire suburban house (mansion) just for themselves is absolutely revolting to me. IT often talks about "entitlement", but this is genuine entitlement where you expect to live in a mansion.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

And that's how it should be. The idea that somebody would want an entire suburban house (mansion) just for themselves is absolutely revolting to me. IT often talks about "entitlement", but this is genuine entitlement where you expect to live in a mansion.

You should live in shoeboxes like in 3rd world shitholes? Jfl, I support developing outwards, not packing everyone together like rats.

More housing means lower property prices, more people flowing in. But in some cases, more blacks and more crime. Regardless it is disgusting they oppose housing Development then go ahead and bitch at their kids for not moving out.

Moving out is overrated anyways. Moving out just to rot alone, great life plan for lonely incels.

 

[Intellectual]

You should live in shoeboxes like in 3rd world shitholes? Jfl, I support developing outwards, not packing everyone together like rats.

It's absolutely disgusting to expect to live in a mansion like you're Bezos unless you contributed a great deal to the world. If you're a doctor who invents a cure for cancer, sure, you get a house, working a 9-5? Not even close to deserving of it.

There's so many rich people who live in Condos, Trump lived in one, Jamie Diamond lives in one. Only Suburbanites who think they're entitled to be a king live in suburs.

Moving out is overrated anyways. Moving out just to rot alone, great life plan for lonely incels.

Moving out is 100% better for mental health.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

It's absolutely disgusting to expect to live in a mansion like you're Bezos unless you contributed a great deal to the world. If you're a doctor who invents a cure for cancer, sure, you get a house, working a 9-5? Not even close to deserving of it.

Suburbs aren’t full of mansions like that of Bezos. And Bezos made a product that made buying goods easier and cheaper than others.

There's so many rich people who live in Condos, Trump lived in one, Jamie Diamond lives in one. Only Suburbanites who think they're entitled to be a king live in suburs.

Most people are not living in condos by themselves like Trump, and condos are usually found in cities rather than suburbs.

Moving out is 100% better for mental health.

True, but you haven’t convinced me to pack everyone like mules.

 

[frmentalcel]

You have to be 18 to post here kid.

 

[Bedford Stye]

1) Feel victimized but receive all the privileges

2) Think the system is slanted against them when they are the biggest and most privileged benefactors of the system

3) Believe they are economically disadvantaged (foid wage gap myth) when they are actually the most economically privileged group (Western law favors workers over employers 1000x)

4) Attempt to censor any criticism of them

5) Demand other people be sacrificed for their comfort and lifestyle

Overgeneralize much ???

 

[Intellectual]

Suburbs aren’t full of mansions like that of Bezos. And Bezos made a product that made buying goods easier and cheaper than others.

Show me a suburban house that's not a mansion. In the U.S they have their own backyards, often private swimming pools, big lawns and driveways, etc.

Most people are not living in condos by themselves like Trump, and condos are usually found in cities rather than suburbs.


True, but you haven’t convinced me to pack everyone like mules.

I'm not suggesting you pack like mules, I'm saying you don't need to live like you're the King of France. A bit more density, less cars, more public transit, and less detached homes.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Show me a suburban house that's not a mansion. In the U.S they have their own backyards, often private swimming pools, big lawns and driveways, etc.

What’s wrong with a backyard, lawn, and driveway? If that’s your definition of a mansion, you are just coping. But the swimming pool is more common among the rich and in hotter areas.

I'm not suggesting you pack like mules, I'm saying you don't need to live like you're the King of France. A bit more density, less cars, more public transit, and less detached homes.

How is that living like the king of France? We have much more space in our countries than people in 3rd world shitholes or even among Pooropeans. Detached homes are an example of what make America/Canada great.

Who tf wants to use public transport and be packed in more dense attached homing? No one, that massively decreases your quality of life and makes like unbearable as an incel especially. Expansion outwards is easily possible, but do you think rich people are going to get their houses become smaller? No, it will be everyone else that’s going to end up packed like a mule. The real reason people want to increase density instead of expansing the housing is because they want us living in goyslop version of housing like they do in most other places.

The environment concerns are just retarded, as people need space to live normally. Look up the mouse utopia experiments, high density living was one of the main factors of why the degeneration occurred.

 

[52baldcurryjanitor]

Don't bother. You'll see why later.

why? i want to know now! (coof vax?)

 

[52baldcurryjanitor]

There's always work to be done, you think we've solved every problem?

yes but what does it matter. All "work" is are needs of a consumer base. Their is no "work" if all the consumers were aborted

Bro, in a society with 10 people, there is still a use for those 10 people. There would still be WORK to do. I don't know why you think less people means less jobs.

yeah but if 5of those people are old dying fucks (old people don't consume as much just medical products). And the other 3 people are old fucks not stepping down from their jobs the remaining 2 are fucked economically. See how it goes?

Mexicans don't buy clothing? They don't eat at McDonalds, buy Airpods, car insurance? Cars, use Instagram, etc?

yes but they ONLY fuck with other mexicans. Unlike white lolbertarians, mexicans have racial pride and won't buy food/clothes from a non-mexican they are kinda like jews in a sense

The nurses who are whipping asses will spend their money on stuff.

those nurses are not having kids, realistically since nurses are overworked they will just go home/pass out in front of netflix/not get married/have kids. Having a geriatric society is BAD look at Japan!

 

[Intellectual]

What’s wrong with a backyard, lawn, and driveway? If that’s your definition of a mansion, you are just coping. But the swimming pool is more common among the rich and in hotter areas.

Because they uses an ungodly amount of wealth and resources. The vast majority of suburbanites did not produce enough or contribute enough to society to deserve that. Again, I'm all for adequate compensation, but you shouldn't deserve to live like Jeff Bezos if you don't do as he does.

How is that living like the king of France? We have much more space in our countries than people in 3rd world shitholes or even among Pooropeans. Detached homes are an example of what make America/Canada great.

You don't really have more living space, because all the jobs and production centers are located in big cities. People have to live condensed for economic reasons, even if there was theoretically infinite land on earth, there'd still be a land shortage because the only useful land would be near other humans.

Who tf wants to use public transport and be packed in more dense attached homing? No one, that massively decreases your quality of life and makes like unbearable as an incel especially. Expansion outwards is easily possible, but do you think rich people are going to get their houses become smaller? No, it will be everyone else that’s going to end up packed like a mule. The real reason people want to increase density instead of expansing the housing is because they want us living in goyslop version of housing like they do in most other places.

You won't enjoy life in a suburb either, unless you're a genuine psychopath or have no shame you will feel very very guilty. It's an undeserved privilege and you're living better than billionaires due to the combination of safety, privacy, and community. Paradoxically, having such a high quality of life will ultimately lower it because you know you did nothing to earn that. You'll feel suicidal everyday due to the immense guilt.

The environment concerns are just retarded, as people need space to live normally. Look up the mouse utopia experiments, high density living was one of the main factors of why the degeneration occurred.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Because they uses an ungodly amount of wealth and resources. The vast majority of suburbanites did not produce enough or contribute enough to society to deserve that. Again, I'm all for adequate compensation, but you shouldn't deserve to live like Jeff Bezos if you don't do as he does.

What kind of shit hole did you crawl out of where that is a privilege? Having a front yard is important for your cars. Having a backyard is important to have some space between you and the house behind you. As well as having some greenery around to prevent suicide.

You don't really have more living space, because all the jobs and production centers are located in big cities. People have to live condensed for economic reasons, even if there was theoretically infinite land on earth, there'd still be a land shortage because the only useful land would be near other humans.

That’s why I say to expand the cities and suburbs. They will still be around other humans. Increasing density helps the economy, but it ruins the mental health of people. I think the suburbs are the perfect balance.

You won't enjoy life in a suburb either, unless you're a genuine psychopath or have no shame you will feel very very guilty. It's an undeserved privilege and you're living better than billionaires due to the combination of safety, privacy, and community. Paradoxically, having such a high quality of life will ultimately lower it because you know you did nothing to earn that. You'll feel suicidal everyday due to the immense guilt.

Massive cope. This is like an African mud hut dweller saying people in first world countries must feel guilty about having electricity and running water because they did nothing to earn that. In fact, it’s almost as much of a cope as thinking Chad feels guilty for being able to get all the pussy and having done nothing to deserve that.

 

[Intellectual]

What kind of shit hole did you crawl out of where that is a privilege? Having a front yard is important for your cars. Having a backyard is important to have some space between you and the house behind you. As well as having some greenery around to prevent suicide.

You'll be more happy living in the city. Even in America, the richest country on earth, only the top 10% live like that, and they are the most depressed people in the country because subliminally they feel so guilty for being so rich and having such a high-quality of life. They have the highest material living standards, but it makes them feel awful for being so ungodly and unfairly privileged.

That’s why I say to expand the cities and suburbs. They will still be around other humans. Increasing density helps the economy, but it ruins the mental health of people. I think the suburbs are the perfect balance.

It doesn't, you'll be far happier living in a dense area, you underestimate how guilty you'll feel in a suburb.

Massive cope. This is like an African mud hut dweller saying people in first world countries must feel guilty about having electricity and running water because they did nothing to earn that. In fact, it’s almost as much of a cope as thinking Chad feels guilty for being able to get all the pussy and having done nothing to deserve that.

Except it's not comparable. Your quality of life in a city in a condo in 2023 is still lightyears above a king 40 years ago. You have internet, vidya, restaurants, cool stuff to look at, food, water, washing machines, jobs, anything you could want.

If you had a girl you'd be the happiest human on earth.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

You'll be more happy living in the city. Even in America, the richest country on earth, only the top 10% live like that, and they are the most depressed people in the country because subliminally they feel so guilty for being so rich and having such a high-quality of life. They have the highest material living standards, but it makes them feel awful for being so ungodly and unfairly privileged.

“You will own nothing, and you will be happy”. People in cities can’t really afford to buy homes, they just rent. No one feels bad about living privileged lives, otherwise everyone would be voluntarily downgrading their living conditions like the unabomber.

It doesn't, you'll be far happier living in a dense area, you underestimate how guilty you'll feel in a suburb.

I lived in both the city and suburbs. I wanted to kill myself everyday in the city, and tried to avoid going home by being outside at college all day.

Except it's not comparable. Your quality of life in a city in a condo in 2023 is still lightyears above a king 40 years ago. You have internet, vidya, restaurants, cool stuff to look at, food, water, washing machines, jobs, anything you could want.

Yes, societies evolve technologically. What’s your point? Kings from the 1500s shat in buckets. Should we stop using toilets as well and feel guilty?

If you had a girl you'd be the happiest human on earth.

Most married dudes I know are miserable. This is a cope.

 

[Intellectual]

“You will own nothing, and you will be happy”. People in cities can’t really afford to buy homes, they just rent. No one feels bad about living privileged lives, otherwise everyone would be voluntarily downgrading their living conditions like the unabomber.

They are. Musk lives in a tiny house, if you look at a lot of billionaires like Dorsey, they're minimalists. The rich aristocrats who live in mansions have a VERY high suicide rate.

And even for the ones who aren't, that doesn't mean it makes them happy. Smokers can't stop smoking, but they still do it. Doesn't mean it's good for them, affluent living is an addiction.

I lived in both the city and suburbs. I wanted to kill myself everyday in the city, and tried to avoid going home by being outside at college all day.

Funny because I now live in a condo in the big city, I'm way happier than I ever was in the suburb. Eventually my family moved out to a mega-mansion up North that was gated by a crowd of trees, it had so much land, waterfront, a river on the other side, a major garden. I absolutely HATED every minute of my life. I've never been happier since I started working in the big city.

Yes, societies evolve technologically. What’s your point? Kings from the 1500s shat in buckets. Should we stop using toilets as well and feel guilty?


Most married dudes I know are miserable. This is a cope.

I calculated my budget and I could maintain my current lifestyle on 40k a year if I wanted. I excessively spend on stuff for cope but I get more depressed when I do that. I've been intentionally going to the steakhouse everyday just to blow some more money but i came back feeling more depressed.

More material wealth will not make you happier.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

They are. Musk lives in a tiny house, if you look at a lot of billionaires like Dorsey, they're minimalists. The rich aristocrats who live in mansions have a VERY high suicide rate.

And even for the ones who aren't, that doesn't mean it makes them happy. Smokers can't stop smoking, but they still do it. Doesn't mean it's good for them, affluent living is an addiction.

The super rich just try to be edgy. Musk lives at work, so he doesn’t need a house. Smoking is a physical addiction, while living in places with lots of space is not an addiction. It’s natural, as humans have lived mostly outdoors for most of history and in spacious living conditions.

Funny because I now live in a condo in the big city, I'm way happier than I ever was in the suburb. Eventually my family moved out to a mega-mansion up North that was gated by a crowd of trees, it had so much land, waterfront, a river on the other side, a major garden. I absolutely HATED every minute of my life. I've never been happier since I started working in the big city.

Mega-mansions are retarded. That’s too isolating imo. Suburb housing is the perfect balance.

I calculated my budget and I could maintain my current lifestyle on 40k a year if I wanted. I excessively spend on stuff for cope but I get more depressed when I do that. I've been intentionally going to the steakhouse everyday just to blow some more money but i came back feeling more depressed.

More material wealth will not make you happier.

People actually are happier when they make more money: Wharton study

Previous research suggested that the correlation between money and happiness levels off once someone makes $75,000 a year, but a new The Wharton School study reveals more nauance.

www.cnbc.com

 

[Intellectual]

The super rich just try to be edgy. Musk lives at work, so he doesn’t need a house. Smoking is a physical addiction, while living in places with lots of space is not an addiction. It’s natural, as humans have lived mostly outdoors for most of history and in spacious living conditions.

Humans lived in tribal environments where we slept with other people (not sex, physical sleeping) in caves. We aren't meant to have our own castles.

Mega-mansions are retarded. That’s too isolating imo. Suburb housing is the perfect balance.

Well as I said I lived in one too, life wasn't good at all. This was before I was fully blackpilled either and I was a kid so I didn't have the problems I had now. I remember feeling like absolute dogshit. This was also back in my Christcuck days so I genuinely believed I would go to hell because I read a vs in the Bible that said if you're extremely rich and materialist you'll go to hell for not donating it.

People actually are happier when they make more money: Wharton study

Previous research suggested that the correlation between money and happiness levels off once someone makes $75,000 a year, but a new The Wharton School study reveals more nauance.

www.cnbc.com

Funny enough I don't even believe the previous study, Jordan Peterson claimed once you earn 60k, your happiness maxes. I think it may be 40k.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Humans lived in tribal environments where we slept with other people (not sex, physical sleeping) in caves. We aren't meant to have our own castles.

Living in apartments (surrounded by people you’re not close to) is bad for your mental health. So is living in cramped places like many apartments, as we lived in wide open living spaces.

Well as I said I lived in one too, life wasn't good at all. This was before I was fully blackpilled either and I was a kid so I didn't have the problems I had now. I remember feeling like absolute dogshit. This was also back in my Christcuck days so I genuinely believed I would go to hell because I read a vs in the Bible that said if you're extremely rich and materialist you'll go to hell for not donating it.

Sounds like christianity has cucked you from enjoying things then, unless you live in a shitty commune like the early christians did.

Funny enough I don't even believe the previous study, Jordan Peterson claimed once you earn 60k, your happiness maxes. I think it may be 40k.

JP is retarded and braindead. The wealth happiness capping studies were never replicated, and newer studies pretty much debunk the idea money isn’t important and keeps being important the more you have.

 

[Intellectual]

Living in apartments (surrounded by people you’re not close to) is bad for your mental health. So is living in cramped places like many apartments, as we lived in wide open living spaces.

It makes you far far happier, you don't feel guilty everyday for taking up so much space.

Sounds like christianity has cucked you from enjoying things then, unless you live in a shitty commune like the early christians did.

Well even before that, knowing I was consuming more resources than all of mankind and only had my quality of life because so many others were oppressed downwards (it's impossible for everyone to be a rich suburbanite) just rubbed me the wrong way too.

JP is retarded and braindead. The wealth happiness capping studies were never replicated, and newer studies pretty much debunk the idea money isn’t important and keeps being important the more you have.

15 Reasons Money Doesn't Buy Happiness - Arrest Your Debt

“Money doesn’t buy happiness” is a common expression that has been around for centuries. It is often heard after someone has just won a lottery or inherited a fortune from a distant relative.

arrestyourdebt.com

More studies back it up.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

It makes you far far happier, you don't feel guilty everyday for taking up so much space.

Almost no one feels bad for taking up space jfl. We are meant to be free and live in spacious environments.

Well even before that, knowing I was consuming more resources than all of mankind and only had my quality of life because so many others were oppressed downwards (it's impossible for everyone to be a rich suburbanite) just rubbed me the wrong way too.

Suburbanite isn’t associated with being rich, it’s associated with being middle class. And thinking you got to where you are due to oppression is just basic economic ignorance.

15 Reasons Money Doesn't Buy Happiness - Arrest Your Debt

“Money doesn’t buy happiness” is a common expression that has been around for centuries. It is often heard after someone has just won a lottery or inherited a fortune from a distant relative.

arrestyourdebt.com

More studies back it up.

Back up what? Money is directly correlated with happiness. The title is literally “why wealthier people are not always happier”, and this just means it is a correlation rather than a law. Money is one part of the equation, but an important one.

 

[Intellectual]

Almost no one feels bad for taking up space jfl. We are meant to be free and live in spacious environments.

Suburbanites are the biggest users of anti-depressants

Suburbanite isn’t associated with being rich, it’s associated with being middle class. And thinking you got to where you are due to oppression is just basic economic ignorance.

The idea of the "middle class live in suburbs" was 1950s propaganda to glorify America to the coldwar. By now everyone knows only the richest Americans can afford to live in suburbs.

Back up what? Money is directly correlated with happiness. The title is literally “why wealthier people are not always happier”, and this just means it is a correlation rather than a law. Money is one part of the equation, but an important one.

So money negatively correlates with happiness, meaning the more you have the more likely you are to be depressed.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Suburbanites are the biggest users of anti-depressants

Where are you getting that from? Research I looked into directly correlated antidepressant use with density of population. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4661687/

The idea of the "middle class live in suburbs" was 1950s propaganda to glorify America to the coldwar. By now everyone knows only the richest Americans can afford to live in suburbs.

Not really. Most the suburbs are full of immigrants here, and it’s mostly rich edgy soy slurping whites living in cities or very poor immigrants.

So money negatively correlates with happiness, meaning the more you have the more likely you are to be depressed.

No it does not jfl, it is a positive correlation. Where did you get the negative correlation?

 

[Intellectual]

Where are you getting that from? Research I looked into directly correlated antidepressant use with density of population. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4661687/

Harvard did a study a while ago, I will try to find it.

Not really. Most the suburbs are full of immigrants here, and it’s mostly rich edgy soy slurping whites living in cities or very poor immigrants.

Rich immigrants or they're renting, owning a suburban home is nearly impossible.

No it does not jfl, it is a positive correlation. Where did you get the negative correlation?

You just admitted it.

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

an encounter with a white girl

KingMoeThe2 Join Date: 2013-06-04 Post Count: 2607 #154470958Thursday, January 22, 2015 10:51 PM CST so i had my flip phone with me and i took it out,then this white girl came and said,"That's not a real phone..". i then asked her what is a real phone, she said, "An iPhone,I just got it today."

Nickmaster101 Join Date: 2009-05-19 Post Count: 4232 #154470977Thursday, January 22, 2015 10:51 PM CST her race is relevant...why?

KingMoeThe2 Join Date: 2013-06-04 Post Count: 2607 #154471036Thursday, January 22, 2015 10:52 PM CST it's an off topic term,not supposed to be racist

AnonyAnonymous Join Date: 2013-06-23 Post Count: 6332 #154471076Thursday, January 22, 2015 10:53 PM CST "her race is relevant...why?" It's plausible that the thread creator is attempting to make the implication that all females of particular ethnic groups enjoy utilizing "IPhones".

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Harvard did a study a while ago, I will try to find it.

Ok

Rich immigrants or they're renting, owning a suburban home is nearly impossible.

Nah, urban homes are infinitely more expensive.

You just admitted it.

Admitted what? I said they are correlated, not negatively correlated.