Has anybody else come to this conclusion yet?
As an Anglo-American, I have always conceived of AA gentlemen as the noble savage. I love how they resist attempts by liberals to rope them into the system and how they would prefer to stay rolling in the mud than to get a desk job and a stable family life, and I love how that exposes holes in liberal ideology and makes them cope and seethe so hard. And that sounds harsh, but I am saying that as a good thing. I am a Rousseauian, and I see humanity's innate goodness shine forth in all of their antics. Because they aren't really resisting attempts to abandon their savage and barbaric ways, but rather protecting their innate goodness from the corrupting influence of civilisation:
And when you think about it this way, all the things white people have "achieved" seems trivial at best, and at worse they become the shackles which inhibit us from self actualizing, acquiring power, and experiencing the full range of human emotions - essentially become happy. Newtonian physics, Darwinian biology, Baroque art, Christian theology, all these civilized inventions have succeeded in corrupting our morals and making us weak. And look what's happening: Western nations aren't having kids and run a pipeline of importing thirdies to keep the numbers up. They are literally self destructing. And besides that too their influence is waning which is allowing China and Africa to fill the power gap. Rousseau in "A Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences" first observed this phenomenon that savage peoples often have stronger moral virtues compared to civilized countries, whose advancements in the arts and sciences make them decadent, which allows for the less civilized people to conquer the more civilized:
As an Anglo-American, I have always conceived of AA gentlemen as the noble savage. I love how they resist attempts by liberals to rope them into the system and how they would prefer to stay rolling in the mud than to get a desk job and a stable family life, and I love how that exposes holes in liberal ideology and makes them cope and seethe so hard. And that sounds harsh, but I am saying that as a good thing. I am a Rousseauian, and I see humanity's innate goodness shine forth in all of their antics. Because they aren't really resisting attempts to abandon their savage and barbaric ways, but rather protecting their innate goodness from the corrupting influence of civilisation:
And when you think about it this way, all the things white people have "achieved" seems trivial at best, and at worse they become the shackles which inhibit us from self actualizing, acquiring power, and experiencing the full range of human emotions - essentially become happy. Newtonian physics, Darwinian biology, Baroque art, Christian theology, all these civilized inventions have succeeded in corrupting our morals and making us weak. And look what's happening: Western nations aren't having kids and run a pipeline of importing thirdies to keep the numbers up. They are literally self destructing. And besides that too their influence is waning which is allowing China and Africa to fill the power gap. Rousseau in "A Discourse on the Moral Effects of the Arts and Sciences" first observed this phenomenon that savage peoples often have stronger moral virtues compared to civilized countries, whose advancements in the arts and sciences make them decadent, which allows for the less civilized people to conquer the more civilized:
Last edited:
