The chart doesn't go high enough to include curries.
Blackpill White men have the lowest celebacy rates among young adults.
They may be clustered In with East Asians under Asian category if these statistics are from the US
R
Another brutal blackpill regarding the correlation between race and celibacy rates. It goes something like this: whites > beaners > niggers > rice/curries.
"Bu...Bu...But muh BBC!!!!" ROFLMAO!!!!
Nigger copers on suicide watch.
What area of the world again
in europe they only want bbc
Another brutal blackpill regarding the correlation between race and celibacy rates. It goes something like this: whites > beaners > niggers > rice/curries.
"Bu...Bu...But muh BBC!!!!" ROFLMAO!!!!
Nigger copers on suicide watch.
Check that number again for Autists.
I wonder where this data was collected.
I guess this is just the USA, right?
Only blacks in America have a right to complain, everybody else decided to go live in white countries on their own free will. I feel for Asians in particular but really, what did you expect?
Lel. That fucking huge spike for chongs. It really is over for asians
I didn't choose to be born a sand nigger, I wish Blackops2cel would release me from this mortal coil.
W
Not everyone lives in USA.
Where are curries on that graph?
JFL @ that huge bar for asian teenagers, damn its fucking over ricecels in hs
There is basically no difference between whites, blacks and hispanics. All of them are just slightly under 40%, which still is very much. JFL at turning this into a JBW cope.
What country was this taken in? It will definitely vary based on where this was taken.
Did you even read the chart? It's 21% of Whites vs 29% of Blacks. JFL if you think that's not a huge difference. Niggers are closer to rice at 35%.
Asian tier IQ post.
J
Suicide fuel for us ethnics. Gonna rope tdy boyo whose coming ??
I've played in a dodgeball league before and there were a shitload of blacks. Many were even athletic but they were all incel.
JBW getting action in (((young adulthood))) = good job betabux paying $1412 per sex session with sub5 wife
WTF kind of cope is this? Even the most giga Tyrone niggers will get brutally smv mogged by White Chads.
The SO many white foids you talking about <10%. Most white foids wouldn't touch an nigger.
What kind of shady website is this? Show me the actual study then.
Last edited:
Every search just comes back to that same questionable article. On the other hand there are countless citable sources out there that show Whites are leagues ahead of blacks.
Can you back up that statement?
Actually I'm in NYC, which probably has one of the most interracial mixings in the world. I'm out around the entire city all the time. Sorry but "all you need to do is step outside" is not a credible citation.
I live in Midtown Manhattan so yeah I ACTUALLY live in NY. Gtfo of here with your cope.
as a white man in west europe youre trash. Its full of mixed kids here..
I comment on what I see daily with my own eyes. I don't give a single flying fuck about what you believe.
Keep coping though, good for your mental health.
Of course you fucking are.
Are you telling me your SMV wouldn't take a hit if you were a curry?
You've seen the numerous NEGATIVE stereotypes made on ethnics (smaller dick or smell like curry, street shitter, scammers), furthermore on average white males are taller than ethnics:
White males having a taller height on average than ethnics, and less negative stereotypes as well as being seen as the most "beautiful" race.
It's inevitable.
Just recently there was a thread stating I'd never date a black woman, but I'm yet to see a thread stating I'd never date a white woman (despite them being gross imo).
White whores don't want white men so white men fuck women from 3rd world countries
No Asian kid was born in the West because he chose it. 100% of the time the parents emigrated for the delusional belief of a better life, not considering their future son would be the bottom of the sexual barrel.
I've never denied that white men are the most sought after race on average on mainstream dating platforms in the US and probably in larger society as a whole. The question becomes why this is the case, is it because all foids just happen to love white skin, or is it because white men have the most attractive features on average? If you're an ugly white guy you obviously don't benefit from this average in the sexual market, just as little as the dumb asian benefits from his racial group having the highest IQ when doing a maths test
There's some factors that need to be calculated into this kind of examination:
1) Normies like to date within their own race. It doesn't matter how much propaganda the television pushes on people, most white women will go for a white man for a variety of reason that can range from social circle to a genetic preference to one's own race, which brings me to my next point:
2) Are races wired to prefer their own kind? Black women are generally seen as pretty ugly by white people but do black people see them as ugly also? I mean Muhammad Ali famously said he prefers black women:
So once you leave out the fact people date within their own community, which in practice always translates to dating within their own race, and once you factor in the probably genetic preference for one's own race, you are left with little discrepancy. You also have to add to this the economic factor, ethnic women preferring white guys because they are more wealthy on average and can afford a better middle class standard.
Once those elements are out of the way, you can start to decide whether the alleged superiority or inferiority of a race in terms of look actually matters, and looking at those stats i'd say it probably doesn't matter as much EXCEPT when it comes to Asians. It would seem Asian women prefer white men in the same way white men prefer Asian women. We know that the economic factor isn't an issue because Asians are actually wealthier than whites, so all that's left is looks. Asians just seem to like how white people look which also explains their obsession with portraying westerners in their comics and the like.
R
Does anyone have the reference for that?
I think the source data comes from:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
But it looks like a Telegraph or Daily Mail format table from what I recall. Or some other news media. Anyone got the source for it?
I think the source data comes from:
Relationship Involvement Among Young Adults: Are Asian American Men an Exceptional Case?
Asian American men and women have been largely neglected in previous studies of romantic relationship formation and status. Using data from the first and fourth waves of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), we examine ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
But it looks like a Telegraph or Daily Mail format table from what I recall. Or some other news media. Anyone got the source for it?
R
Does anyone have the reference for that?
I think the source data comes from:
Relationship Involvement Among Young Adults: Are Asian American Men an Exceptional Case?
Asian American men and women have been largely neglected in previous studies of romantic relationship formation and status. Using data from the first and fourth waves of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health), we examine ...
But it looks like a Telegraph or Daily Mail format table from what I recall. Or some other news media. Anyone got the source for it?
Doesn't seem to be from that on closer analysis but that provides the same blackpills for ricemen.
Quotes:
- Asian men, but not black or Hispanic men, exhibit significantly lower odds of involvement than white men. Specifically, they have roughly half the odds of current involvement as white men.
- Asian women were half as likely as Asian men to be unpartnered (i.e., 18% versus 35%).
- We found no evidence that socioeconomic resources or physical characteristics were driving the lower levels of involvement among Asian men. Instead, our findings are consistent with the notion that Asian American men are at the bottom of the racial hierarchy when it comes to the different-sex dating market.
- If “Asian cultural values” account for differences in romantic partnership formation, we would have found similar patterns for Asian women as Asian men. In fact, the opposite was true.
- A racial hierarchy explanation suggests that Asian American men will be less likely than Asian American women to be partnered, as Asian American men face gendered cultural stereotypes barring them from entry into romantic partnerships.
I expected blacks to be higher this is very intereting
Is that suppose to constitute as some kind of proof? I see otherwise with my own eyes daily. My god you're fucking stupid. You need to see a doctor.
COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE COPE AND COPE!
Do you live in Europe? No, so fuck off.
volcel if you're ethnic and don't get laid in europe
Hey OP, share the source. This is good info that can be deployed in debates. Don't just share an image you could very well have made yourself. Asshole.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
