Yes, it was quite impressive of Japan with its limited population and industrial resources to have been able to fight a multi front war against the Chinese in mainland east asia, the Americans in the pacific, and the Commonwealth in Burma and India practically all by itself.
Curries fought the Japanese in Burmawhite moggers killing each other
idc about browns. care about gers and slavs since thats what i am
They already did with France and won. I believe they could have won in Russia if they went straight for Moscow instead of focusing on securing their southern flank at Kiev.
Yes, the Red Army had numbers, but was barebones with their logistics stretched beyond their limits by 1945 and was dependent on the lend-lease from the Western Allies for most of the war. I don't want to underestimate its role in the war, but it was definitely not the unstoppable force that could sweep across continental Europe as some believe today.
The Germans had plenty of fuel from Romania and from their own synthetic gas refineries in 1941, but only enough to keep their military at full strength for a few months, which was one of the reasons for the invasion: to conquer the oil fields in the Caucasus.
Moscow was the central rail hub. You take Moscow you take down their main source of moving material around
Jflwhite moggers killing each other
True, but I still believe Hitler was justified in shifting the attack southwards for the aforementioned reason and to protect his army's own supply lines from a Soviet counteroffensive from the South which could've jeopardized the entire campaign. It was a gamble he had to take.
Yeah it was a gamble that he had to take. The Soviet Union was going to invade probably around 1943-44. Regardless Germany did its best with the very little resources it had in rubber and oil. It took on 3 super powers at the same time. Defeated France and was able to hang on for 4 years.
Very true indeed.
