they simply don't, but i hear many of you referring to women as eugenicists even though no actual eugenicist would look at woman's sexual selections and think they are improving the human gene pool. women have not psychologically developed in 100k years, but society has changed and the sort of people we need in society back then is totally different to what it is now. an ooga booga caveman 50k years ago with a huge frame, chin, height etc. is more useful then than they are now. a modern society puts more emphasis on men with high iqs, high in altruism, less aggression etc. which are precisely the sort of things you must have in order to have a functioning modern civilisation. this sort of selection over thousands of years is what has distinguished the higher racces from the lower ones. women still go for the deadbeat loser low iq drug dealer because omg muh pussy tingles. go ask a group of career criminals how many of them are virgins and a group of stem graduates how many of them are virgins and try telling me foids are only doing their part to strengthen the human gene pool. the human species is going backwards because those men who should be reproducing are being cancelled out of the gene pool and this genetic bottleneck must be stopped now.
