Sure
.
Those are the relevant tables from those two studies:
Tactics of sexual coercion: When men and women won't take no for an answer
Sexual coercion in men and women: Similar behaviors, different predictors
Both of whom show up on the very first page when you search "sexual coercion tactics" in Google Scholar
.
I went a bit deeper into that in this post:
https://themessenger.com/health/60-thousand-rape-victims-pregnant-states-with-total-abortion-ban More than 60,000 women and girls have become pregnant after being raped in states with total abortion bans in the months since Roe v. Wade was overturned, researchers estimate. Following the U.S...
incels.is
But basically, what it means, is exactly what is shown in those tables. For both men and women, when they want to rape someone, that is, when they want to coerce sex from someone who's not entirely willing to do so, physical force is by far the least likely tactic. The Hollywood/horror/fiction idea of a rapist ambushing a random woman and forcibly violating her is nowhere near even close to how 90%+ of sexual coercion and coerced sex happens in real life. There, the most common tactic is seduction and using someone's arousal against them, with alcohol usually playing a major role as well, plus manipulation.
I'm actually thinking of making a seperate post just about this to go as in depth onto this and how it proves that not only is the portrayal of incels as rapists obviously wrong, but it is also flat out nonsensical, because the vast majority of rape is done in a way that is impossible for incels to do. We don't have the looks or the social capital to arouse/seduce a woman, be with one in a social situation where she's getting drunk, or manipulate her in any way, all of those rape tactics are impossible for incels.