Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

What's your guys opinion on Meliorism?

  • Thread starter SecularNeo-Khazar
  • Start date
SecularNeo-Khazar

SecularNeo-Khazar

Mixedcell
-
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Posts
1,432

Meliorism is the idea that humanity constantly improves and this walk to perfection is unending, its pessimistic in the sense you will awlays be awful, but much better then you were, and still succeed to further develop and definitely improve.

I have incorporated this idea as a doctrine into my ideology. I believe that pain is what creates knowledge, and upon reflection (which is force of will clashing with knowledge) you create progress (vector of movement) towards good. This means that whatever evil happens, the pain from it will always lead to a net positive outcome.

Basically, everything who was Rodion Raskolnikov. Create tragedy, reflect, improve. This does come at a price, that you must be punished for moral evil, because you operated on the material realm by cutting ties towards responsibilitites of good.

You can choose to perfrom evil, knowing you do evil, meaning your purposely choose evil and you're not simply misguided or acted on your worldview thinking you are the good guy (Raslkonikov did, my ideology does not require it), in order to create suffering through tragedy, to sacriffice yourself, so that you will be punished, for the milions that might have done the same, but now won't, as there is new law, new religion and new knowledge to educate them, to safeguard them.

Is there anything more perfect? Usually we scoff and actually allow for the means justify the ends idea to lead us, but here, you use evil, you receive good outcomes, and you get punished as you were not justified. Perfect coherence. Perfect power. You game the system so hard, you cause a bug to appear like in a game, where a great negative or positive number turns into the opposite aligment.

Only Maximiliam Robespierre came the closest to this with his speech to the national assembly from february.
 
Brutal noreplypill. I'm so radical I scared you.
 

Meliorism is the idea that humanity constantly improves and this walk to perfection is unending, its pessimistic in the sense you will awlays be awful, but much better then you were, and still succeed to further develop and definitely improve.

I have incorporated this idea as a doctrine into my ideology. I believe that pain is what creates knowledge, and upon reflection (which is force of will clashing with knowledge) you create progress (vector of movement) towards good. This means that whatever evil happens, the pain from it will always lead to a net positive outcome.

Basically, everything who was Rodion Raskolnikov. Create tragedy, reflect, improve. This does come at a price, that you must be punished for moral evil, because you operated on the material realm by cutting ties towards responsibilitites of good.

You can choose to perfrom evil, knowing you do evil, meaning your purposely choose evil and you're not simply misguided or acted on your worldview thinking you are the good guy (Raslkonikov did, my ideology does not require it), in order to create suffering through tragedy, to sacriffice yourself, so that you will be punished, for the milions that might have done the same, but now won't, as there is new law, new religion and new knowledge to educate them, to safeguard them.

Is there anything more perfect? Usually we scoff and actually allow for the means justify the ends idea to lead us, but here, you use evil, you receive good outcomes, and you get punished as you were not justified. Perfect coherence. Perfect power. You game the system so hard, you cause a bug to appear like in a game, where a great negative or positive number turns into the opposite aligment.

Only Maximiliam Robespierre came the closest to this with his speech to the national assembly from february.
I think this idea is completely false. I think that humanity develops in cycles and that the civilizations of the past were MUCH more advanced than modern civilization. Modern humans are also genetical degenerates compared to original humans.
 

Meliorism is the idea that humanity constantly improves and this walk to perfection is unending, its pessimistic in the sense you will awlays be awful, but much better then you were, and still succeed to further develop and definitely improve.

I have incorporated this idea as a doctrine into my ideology. I believe that pain is what creates knowledge, and upon reflection (which is force of will clashing with knowledge) you create progress (vector of movement) towards good. This means that whatever evil happens, the pain from it will always lead to a net positive outcome.

Basically, everything who was Rodion Raskolnikov. Create tragedy, reflect, improve. This does come at a price, that you must be punished for moral evil, because you operated on the material realm by cutting ties towards responsibilitites of good.

You can choose to perfrom evil, knowing you do evil, meaning your purposely choose evil and you're not simply misguided or acted on your worldview thinking you are the good guy (Raslkonikov did, my ideology does not require it), in order to create suffering through tragedy, to sacriffice yourself, so that you will be punished, for the milions that might have done the same, but now won't, as there is new law, new religion and new knowledge to educate them, to safeguard them.

Is there anything more perfect? Usually we scoff and actually allow for the means justify the ends idea to lead us, but here, you use evil, you receive good outcomes, and you get punished as you were not justified. Perfect coherence. Perfect power. You game the system so hard, you cause a bug to appear like in a game, where a great negative or positive number turns into the opposite aligment.

Only Maximiliam Robespierre came the closest to this with his speech to the national assembly from february.
Im not sure my country turning into a fag blue is positive.
 
I think this idea is completely false. I think that humanity develops in cycles and that the civilizations of the past were MUCH more advanced than modern civilization. Modern humans are also genetical degenerates compared to original humans.
 
This dude is extremely bluepilled along with his idealism
 
This dude is extremely bluepilled along with his idealism
I guess you reffer to this?

Time will proove the practicality of my words. You undersetimate human psyche. Its part of our biology, same way the grounding animalistic needs and they can really fuck you up when they're at odds.

Reality is what we execute and belief can be made material with acts of labour. If it can be done and realized it must be truer when it yields more benefits then the previous version. Our consiousness is above that of animals, we can grasp math with mind, we can make invoke math with physics.

Looks matter so far you start craving a family. This makes people settle down. Some have this part of instinct weaker or stronger and its just a matter of your genes. Is it so hard to imagine there are people that actually were born with it being the strongest, so they have "low standards" overall? Way of being where the brain activates arousal, religious worhsipping, thirst the very same a good looking stacy would instill you if you saw her.

I feel bad for them because then they think they're lying for not caring as much for appearence. Thye care, its not just cost effective to get pleasure for it.

And their antithesis is our bane brocel.

Abuse hookers and men who for the pleasure to fuck can pass down their genes of disloyalty and apathy to the feelings of the other, making trauma, degrading society.

Why allow the fuckboys to destroy foids whose tolerance is greater for looks because she is made to primarly focus on having kids, increasing the number of the humans existing then to soley work for printer of chad and get her existential fulfimment from that?

Why allow exitence of women who seduce men, that feel bad doing something behind their spouses back and eventually come back after some flirting? Why do they have this in them? How much of it is being scarred of not acting on their drive? How much of it is it

Are these two not the same? Are these two not the same DNA sequence just paired up with different chromosomes? Aren't they a spawn of chance? What makes me, who is just unfortunate to be born and think this way at fault? I'm just at a disatvatage.

I'm literally the meme of "just be ethnic" or mixed if I happened to meet a foid with a copy paste biologically determined set of behaviour. I'm among you for the fact (and many other men are too who sort of feel this way, maybe with looks having more weight in their mind to trigger the happiness, but they would have to be very coerced to cheat if they're born with this dependence of psychological trigger.) that foids just must have a base, they will be always hypergamic in some fashion, no less then a man, as to first get his inner mechanism triggered he must approach a foid and that requires attraction from looks. A stacy and chad must win in the first phase. It must.

It is a mixture and people like me are at a disatvantage becaouse of the pseudoreligious nature of culture, fear and also that looks focused indyviduals have more numbers.

Its a unending downfall, as even I know a stacy is far better then a becky. Yet when I watch porn I can nut to a sub5 foid just as to a stacy, the time of it is different, but its never a turn off. Never would I loose something secure for something vague.

My fantasies with both are so close in what I get, maybe at times even the same if there is little difference of the picture I have in my mind (but that is male sex drive making us more acceptant). This leads to men like me having a conundrum brocel. I can't say looks don't matter but I know I work different. I will get obviously more pleasure from engaging with a stacy, plus status from people who believe having a pretty wife is worth something.

I think I would rather die then to bow my head before anybody for something like that if it was expected and not something I would do myself out my own free will. You can always kill that person and most people get like 20 or 25 years for that. A life for twenty five years of your? You won.

Continuing the digression, I'm losing for being a minority, literally. My feelings would make think of her as georgous, as they pass the necessery steps for me to feel enough attracted to feel justified in thinking she is, because only that beauty would make me say it.

Thing is the exact archetype is very rare. Just as the archetype of the nympho, and the doormat man, as the men and women I want to exist. There exists proportion to lean into one side based on a genetic compromise what sort of executive behaviour would best benefit the constant survival and prosperity.

I am not perfect and I would most likely with enough effort from the stacy cheat on my sub5. I would have to break through my software I coded in my brain whilst with the sub5 becky.

Its all a game of power and doctrine. There is more high IQ men and well as low IQ men. High IQ women who are hypergamic know that they can in todays society just buy themselves a teenage male magazine model just like High IQ looks focused men did with women back in the day.
The awarage IQ woman and the avarage IQ man who are looks focused settle down and cheat, or are single moms whilst the men have a backup of a family they created when they settled down and have fear, so they get the sex and go away.

Whatever gene you have and the foid has, it must, even if typically dysmoprhic, try and realize itself as a proposiotion of alternative. To add or substract this typically dismorphic trait to the opposite gender and see if the species wants that.

Just trade bro

Lets fucking experiment.

I have nothing against trapping a thousand kids in a lobarotory for 50 years and run social experiments on them. Death cults can anihilate hundreds. How the hell can this social believe so strongly tread on the truths of human self-preservation, how can this feeling be more important then to breed?

Everything we suffer from as incels is the dominance of todays biological prerogatives. Water this shit down. Make it die.

I see no reason why the some humans today are not born different enough to create society where inceldom is just about being alone for looks and is not about also receiving torture from looks. Why abuse an incel who can kill himself?

He can work. Energy wise its stupid to kill an incel or to drive him to suicide. Its the fault of those who were born to think that way and create humans thinking that way, predetermined to also act this way.

There is no God, so people must try and act like him for humanitys sake.

And thing is brocel, ther are men who acted on this or simillar, that's why we have always had a pressure to have a family. Because non incelic men like me in the past, some of them, at least managed to win this much. Naturally there also were cynical men in the patriarchal past who just did it to virtue signal at that time and those who came to the calculated thought that with enough sneakyness they can have one foid at home, fuck many around, and if the husband next door is a betabuxer or the father is just a propability case.

I won't stay stay silent anymore. My faction will win, theirs must die.
 
Last edited:
I think this idea is completely false. I think that humanity develops in cycles and that the civilizations of the past were MUCH more advanced than modern civilization. Modern humans are also genetical degenerates compared to original humans.
Have you considered that maybe the circles go up? That if you run a linear line through the centers it would show growth?
 
Last edited:
Have you considered that maybe the circles go up? That if you run a linear line through the centers it would show growth?
No. I just cant see any growth if i look back more than a few centuries ago. I think the humanity was MUCH more developed in prehistoric times, and i dont see an opportunity to restore this level of development.

Of course the official science will say that there is no proof that there was a highly developed civilization in the past, but im 100% sure there was. Around 20000 years ago.

Also the Earth we see today is basically a cripple planet. Earth should NOT be like we know it. There should be no rotation axis tilt, and the climate should be much much warmer. Antarctica was a jungle in the past, and combined with the fact that the Earth didnt have rotation axis tilt, Antarctica was in a state of constant sunset/sunrise, which made this place a paradise on Earth.

People that inhabited it would be considered gods if they lived today. They were racially not mixed, and because of this they lived much longer than modern humans and were immune to all diseases that you can imagine.

Their society was a perfect utopia without private property.

The majority of users who will read this text will probablt think im a schizo, but this is what i believe in and i have reasons to believe in it. Some people believe in god, even thought there is no proof that god exists, so i can call them schizos too.
 
The majority of users who will read this text will probablt think im a schizo
I culd call you that to bully you in order to gain some clasps among the people who would really feel disdain towards you. I won't do that. You seem to just follow the infromation you have encountered and did what everybody does, express it and embrace it.

But like, what argument would chnage your mind? Or at the very least what fact you rely on would have be debunked so that you might start to doubt?
 
I guess you reffer to this?

Time will proove the practicality of my words. You undersetimate human psyche. Its part of our biology, same way the grounding animalistic needs and they can really fuck you up when they're at odds.

Reality is what we execute and belief can be made material with acts of labour. If it can be done and realized it must be truer when it yields more benefits then the previous version. Our consiousness is above that of animals, we can grasp math with mind, we can make invoke math with physics.

Looks matter so far you start craving a family. This makes people settle down. Some have this part of instinct weaker or stronger and its just a matter of your genes. Is it so hard to imagine there are people that actually were born with it being the strongest, so they have "low standards" overall? Way of being where the brain activates arousal, religious worhsipping, thirst the very same a good looking stacy would instill you if you saw her.

I feel bad for them because then they think they're lying for not caring as much for appearence. Thye care, its not just cost effective to get pleasure for it.

And their antithesis is our bane brocel.

Abuse hookers and men who for the pleasure to fuck can pass down their genes of disloyalty and apathy to the feelings of the other, making trauma, degrading society.

Why allow the fuckboys to destroy foids whose tolerance is greater for looks because she is made to primarly focus on having kids, increasing the number of the humans existing then to soley work for printer of chad and get her existential fulfimment from that?

Why allow exitence of women who seduce men, that feel bad doing something behind their spouses back and eventually come back after some flirting? Why do they have this in them? How much of it is being scarred of not acting on their drive? How much of it is it

Are these two not the same? Are these two not the same DNA sequence just paired up with different chromosomes? Aren't they a spawn of chance? What makes me, who is just unfortunate to be born and think this way at fault? I'm just at a disatvatage.

I'm literally the meme of "just be ethnic" or mixed if I happened to meet a foid with a copy paste biologically determined set of behaviour. I'm among you for the fact (and many other men are too who sort of feel this way, maybe with looks having more weight in their mind to trigger the happiness, but they would have to be very coerced to cheat if they're born with this dependence of psychological trigger.) that foids just must have a base, they will be always hypergamic in some fashion, no less then a man, as to first get his inner mechanism triggered he must approach a foid and that requires attraction from looks. A stacy and chad must win in the first phase. It must.

It is a mixture and people like me are at a disatvantage becaouse of the pseudoreligious nature of culture, fear and also that looks focused indyviduals have more numbers.

Its a unending downfall, as even I know a stacy is far better then a becky. Yet when I watch porn I can nut to a sub5 foid just as to a stacy, the time of it is different, but its never a turn off. Never would I loose something secure for something vague.

My fantasies with both are so close in what I get, maybe at times even the same if there is little difference of the picture I have in my mind (but that is male sex drive making us more acceptant). This leads to men like me having a conundrum brocel. I can't say looks don't matter but I know I work different. I will get obviously more pleasure from engaging with a stacy, plus status from people who believe having a pretty wife is worth something.

I think I would rather die then to bow my head before anybody for something like that if it was expected and not something I would do myself out my own free will. You can always kill that person and most people get like 20 or 25 years for that. A life for twenty five years of your? You won.

Continuing the digression, I'm losing for being a minority, literally. My feelings would make think of her as georgous, as they pass the necessery steps for me to feel enough attracted to feel justified in thinking she is, because only that beauty would make me say it.

Thing is the exact archetype is very rare. Just as the archetype of the nympho, and the doormat man, as the men and women I want to exist. There exists proportion to lean into one side based on a genetic compromise what sort of executive behaviour would best benefit the constant survival and prosperity.

I am not perfect and I would most likely with enough effort from the stacy cheat on my sub5. I would have to break through my software I coded in my brain whilst with the sub5 becky.

Its all a game of power and doctrine. There is more high IQ men and well as low IQ men. High IQ women who are hypergamic know that they can in todays society just buy themselves a teenage male magazine model just like High IQ looks focused men did with women back in the day.
The awarage IQ woman and the avarage IQ man who are looks focused settle down and cheat, or are single moms whilst the men have a backup of a family they created when they settled down and have fear, so they get the sex and go away.

Whatever gene you have and the foid has, it must, even if typically dysmoprhic, try and realize itself as a proposiotion of alternative. To add or substract this typically dismorphic trait to the opposite gender and see if the species wants that.

Just trade bro

Lets fucking experiment.

I have nothing against trapping a thousand kids in a lobarotory for 50 years and run social experiments on them. Death cults can anihilate hundreds. How the hell can this social believe so strongly tread on the truths of human self-preservation, how can this feeling be more important then to breed?

Everything we suffer from as incels is the dominance of todays biological prerogatives. Water this shit down. Make it die.

I see no reason why the some humans today are not born different enough to create society where inceldom is just about being alone for looks and is not about also receiving torture from looks. Why abuse an incel who can kill himself?

He can work. Energy wise its stupid to kill an incel or to drive him to suicide. Its the fault of those who were born to think that way and create humans thinking that way, predetermined to also act this way.

There is no God, so people must try and act like him for humanitys sake.

And thing is brocel, ther are men who acted on this or simillar, that's why we have always had a pressure to have a family. Because non incelic men like me in the past, some of them, at least managed to win this much. Naturally there also were cynical men in the patriarchal past who just did it to virtue signal at that time and those who came to the calculated thought that with enough sneakyness they can have one foid at home, fuck many around, and if the husband next door is a betabuxer or the father is just a propability case.

I won't stay stay silent anymore. My faction will win, theirs must die.
I would rather die fighting than being ruled by kalergi mongrel spiteful mutant
 
You never stopped viewing meds as candy. You'll choke on the poison that guarantees inceldom.
I will buy just buy a foid from the place where i live if everything that i try fails (i'm still gathering money)

Who is choking in inceldom now huh?
 
I will buy just buy a foid from the place where i live if everything that i try fails (i'm still gathering money)

Who is choking in inceldom now huh?
Idk if you mean like betabuxing or slavery.

I never said I don't. As a matter of fact I even admitted it in the post you replied to.

What ammounts to making you horny for a stacy is her appearence, no? I am horny becouse the person I would be with posses the trait of being my partner. My brain boosts her looks above what her looks can provide me with by default. Meaning, I make her have a halo effect that only works on me. Third, I also have a easier time to try and engage with a foid whose closer to me on the scales looks, because my brain alredy makes her more then she is for you.

Ultimetly the genes I have to make me like this would also have their effect on foids, whatever trait a female or male posses, it must try and realize itself as a trait in the oppsoite sex even if it is typically dismorphic to propose a evolutionairy alternative. Its easier not be an incel, becouse looks matter less. Its harder for somebody to entice one of the two, because the looks althou better are still beneath the emotional value you get from the partner supported by your halo effect on them.

Stable families, self executing traditional roles, willingness to bring kids to the world, foids cheat less, you have grounds to feel horny both from basic sexual drive as well as your romantic need to show love through sex. And she is just so much sexier thanks to you actually being together, and you can't explain why. You just know.

That only exists as long as we are together. And getting supplied with affection without a relationship would be not as rewarding. People would try and have relationships.

So, a simple becky, with her looks better then my sub5 partner, instantly is worth less. She would have to actually try first make me switch the target of my halo effect.

Good looks still pass on, but slower.

So to phrase it as simply as I can brocel, my partner appears hot, even if to you she is not, because she is with me. This fact, is interpreted by me if it was the best physical trait she has. My happiness and my arousal stands on my awareness who she is for me. The job of my eyes has shifted to feelings now making me able to perceive.

I'm like this, and I know what I feel. There are men who must be simillar to me and ther must be foids too. Physical looks focused people can't understand it, becouse the source of our attraction is of two different natures.

Graphical for them and that triggers attraction and love. Its circumstantial. At old age you will have the same standards and be in pain.

Mental for me, so forever present until she dies, and even then, among the older females, possible to set ablaze anew.
 
137.jpg
 
Idk if you mean like betabuxing or slavery.

I never said I don't. As a matter of fact I even admitted it in the post you replied to.

What ammounts to making you horny for a stacy is her appearence, no? I am horny becouse the person I would be with posses the trait of being my partner. My brain boosts her looks above what her looks can provide me with by default. Meaning, I make her have a halo effect that only works on me. Third, I also have a easier time to try and engage with a foid whose closer to me on the scales looks, because my brain alredy makes her more then she is for you.

Ultimetly the genes I have to make me like this would also have their effect on foids, whatever trait a female or male posses, it must try and realize itself as a trait in the oppsoite sex even if it is typically dismorphic to propose a evolutionairy alternative. Its easier not be an incel, becouse looks matter less. Its harder for somebody to entice one of the two, because the looks althou better are still beneath the emotional value you get from the partner supported by your halo effect on them.

Stable families, self executing traditional roles, willingness to bring kids to the world, foids cheat less, you have grounds to feel horny both from basic sexual drive as well as your romantic need to show love through sex. And she is just so much sexier thanks to you actually being together, and you can't explain why. You just know.

That only exists as long as we are together. And getting supplied with affection without a relationship would be not as rewarding. People would try and have relationships.

So, a simple becky, with her looks better then my sub5 partner, instantly is worth less. She would have to actually try first make me switch the target of my halo effect.

Good looks still pass on, but slower.

So to phrase it as simply as I can brocel, my partner appears hot, even if to you she is not, because she is with me. This fact, is interpreted by me if it was the best physical trait she has. My happiness and my arousal stands on my awareness who she is for me. The job of my eyes has shifted to feelings now making me able to perceive.

I'm like this, and I know what I feel. There are men who must be simillar to me and ther must be foids too. Physical looks focused people can't understand it, becouse the source of our attraction is of two different natures.

Graphical for them and that triggers attraction and love. Its circumstantial. At old age you will have the same standards and be in pain.

Mental for me, so forever present until she dies, and even then, among the older females, possible to set ablaze anew.
All you do is dancing around abstract echo chamber which is fictional at best and unrealistic

Sorry i'm a bit harsh because i'm no longer have any choice after all
 
All you do is dancing around abstract echo chamber which is fictional at best and unrealistic
Muslims thought the same in 1097 during the siege of Antioch. Yet it was morale, feelings, that brought victory.

Rats who were sent to drown and were saved, and this torture repeated a few times, survived longer then rats that were dropped without being saved.

Its not unrealistic. By the looks of it for you it might be. Wouldn't surpise me if yo judged my big coffe mug as a plant pot.
 
This is like Zeno's paradox, but for the improvement of humanity.
 
You are a moron who has never built anything remotely complex. You'd quickly realize the path is never linear.
 
Just a look at ancient architecture will turn you cope into shit.

We've been devolving.
 
How would anyone even know if we are getting better or worse ?
 

Similar threads

VλREN
Replies
6
Views
208
Thaway
Thaway
four1298
Replies
4
Views
502
tired as fuck
tired as fuck

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top