Whats the answer?

[CRASH THE CUCK]

God makes an unbreakable object, that he can not even break himself - this means God isn't all powerful as he can't destroy the object

God can makes an ''unbreakable object'', but he can destroy it, thus its not unbreakable, and God is limited because he cant make an obejct he cant destroy

 

[endoftheskies]

God makes an unbreakable object, that he can not even break himself - this means God isn't all powerful as he can't destroy the object

God can makes an ''unbreakable object'', but he can destroy it, thus its not unbreakable, and God is limited because he cant make an obejct he cant destroy

its ilogical due to infinite descent. the assumptions are illogical due to infinite descent. its an stupid paradox, because the assumptions are illogical and do not make logically coherent sense. its the same argument as x > x. infinity > infinity.

 

[CRASH THE CUCK]

its ilogical due to infinite descent. the assumptions are illogical due to infinite descent. its an stupid paradox, because the assumptions are illogical and do not make logically coherent sense. its the same argument as x > x. infinity > infinity.

 

[FuckYou]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TN25ghkfgQA&pp=ygUMdnNhdWNlIHRoZW1l

 

[Diddy]

its ilogical due to infinite descent. the assumptions are illogical due to infinite descent. its an stupid paradox, because the assumptions are illogical and do not make logically coherent sense. its the same argument as x > x. infinity > infinity.

There are different levels of infinity though.

 

[endoftheskies]

There are different levels of infinity though.

you are talking about the concept of uncountable/countable infinity which is not relevant to this conversation.

 

[RandomGuy]

its ilogical due to infinite descent. the assumptions are illogical due to infinite descent. its an stupid paradox, because the assumptions are illogical and do not make logically coherent sense. its the same argument as x > x. infinity > infinity.

making muh dizzy.