Title question. Imagine average height and not an extremely bad face. Something like a 4/10 face with good body vs a 6-7/10 face with a chubby (BMI<30 and BMI>25) body.
Experiment What's better: chubby with good face or ripped with bad face?
Face > all
Chubby mate. You can lose weight
But imagine you can't. You have some condition that makes it very difficult.
Fat is law
There's no such thing as conditions. This is female brainwashing babble. You can lose weight no matter how much coping you have for you softy worry fatty mc fat fat body. You lazy faggot. Stupid fat faggot. Idiotic faggot that cannot comprehend not changing short height. Stupid motherfucker blob of cells. THE COSMIC AUTHORITY IS ON YOUR ASS NOW
for a male , ripped with ugly face
for a woman , chubby with good face
for a woman , chubby with good face
There are medical conditions that severely hinder weight loss.
Incorrect foid. Follow my law and lose it tubby
S
Wheat Waffles has already proved that being fat impacts you way more than just having a bad face:
In his research, he evaluated 1,000 men who sent him photos of their faces.
Only 14% of ripped guys were sub5, against a whopping 93% of overweight ones, with none of the latter group even reaching the 6 threshold.
Sure, there must be some edge cases here and there, but your question would make no sense if both alternatives referred to these cases, so I decided to answer it statistically.
In his research, he evaluated 1,000 men who sent him photos of their faces.
Only 14% of ripped guys were sub5, against a whopping 93% of overweight ones, with none of the latter group even reaching the 6 threshold.
Sure, there must be some edge cases here and there, but your question would make no sense if both alternatives referred to these cases, so I decided to answer it statistically.
Good face and chubby. You can lose weight. You can't gain face.
R
Obviously I wont answer with the dumbass response of well just lose weight as the chubby one
To actually weigh them up face and chubby is better for the female gaze but ugly ripped is better for the male gaze more respect from other men more intimidating and stuff but I think being attractive to foids is more important so really chubby good face.
Also a ripped dude even if ugly will make a better first impression and a chubby person a worse one, however once you spend more time around people you would start to focus on their body a little less
To actually weigh them up face and chubby is better for the female gaze but ugly ripped is better for the male gaze more respect from other men more intimidating and stuff but I think being attractive to foids is more important so really chubby good face.
Also a ripped dude even if ugly will make a better first impression and a chubby person a worse one, however once you spend more time around people you would start to focus on their body a little less
Lol imagine buying into the normie myth that being chubby lowers your smv in any meaningful way. All that matters is bone structure, masculine frame and height. Of course you shouldn't be heavily overweight but that's obvious.
I'd go as far as saying chubby and good face is more attractive to foids, they want men that fill out space and have a powerful presence.
I'd go as far as saying chubby and good face is more attractive to foids, they want men that fill out space and have a powerful presence.
This. Face means everything, subhuman face = subhuman forever.
R
It does matter in a way, hamza is a good example of a previously chubby kid with lower SMV. The thing is he had good genetics hiding underneath it.
What does matter in a way? Are you even responding to anything i wrote?
R
I am saying being chubby can meaningfully affect your SMV, hence why this thread was even made in the first place.
Enough fat can hide your bone structure especially on your face
But this is based on his opinion alone. Even worse, this is from after he became a scammer.
There is also research showing that men with a 25-30 BMI have the most partners. With a sharp drop when BMI goes beyond 30.
Thank you for this. It's what I meant initially.
This makes a lot of sense. Although once you get a gf you'll receive all the respect and good impressions you need even if you're chubby. Girlfriend is a the biggest social proof a man can have.
S
Is he a scammer? I found his channel just recently. Yeah, he is the one rating the faces, but from other videos I saw he does have common sense in his analyses.
As for these BMI studies, that's only true if you don't take muscles into account. Women don't want skinny guys, but they do want ripped guys.
I am the tallest in my family at a meagre 178 cm, my big bro is 175 cm, very fat but also strong, he has a i'd say 8 to 8.5/10 face and it's insane how many people try to talk to him, women try to oblige him, scan their cards at the grocery store so he gets free shit etc
Doesn't matter if you got fat as long as you got strength and face as proven by ol big bro
Doesn't matter if you got fat as long as you got strength and face as proven by ol big bro
S
BMI is a trash retard tier system
It's really not. Especially when combined with other metrics, like BF.
He started selling these ratings, which frankly are bullshit to me. He also sold out. Some of his newer content goes against what he says in his older videos. His older content is much better. One thing he said that stuck with is: women pursue chads, tolerate normies, and are hostile to ugly guys. That's all the rating you need.
It takes a lot of muscle to make the BMI scale inaccurate.
S
no it sucks. it says if you are an average height male you look normal at 130 lbs but overweight at 180-190 lbs
130 at 5'10 would be thin as fuck and definitely not normal
^
It's a retarded metric until you get body fat % data for all the people you have BMIs of. BMI considers heavily muscled people to be fat. This is how you get that stupid statistic that people with BMIs between 25 and 30 have the most sex partners. It's not the fat fucks getting laid, it's the roiders.
It takes a lot of muscle for guys to be considered overweight by the BMI scale. Most people, even gymbros, don't have that kind of muscle.
Christian Bale is 183 cm tall and he looked big and strong at 86 kg in the Batman movies. That's a BMI of 25,7 which is barely overweight. At this point, getting even more pure muscle is very difficult. Most people don't achieve this without roids. And most people, even most gymbros, don't use roids. Huge, roided dudes are not throwing off the study, unless the researchers purposely fucked with their own data by interviewing roided dudes mostly.
Kind of agree on this. The lower end is really not a good representation. Being that thin doesn't apply to the great majority of people though.
R
Oh absolutely its the biggest social proof especially in 2023.
It doesnt even matter about the quality of the foid so long as you bag one
That'd be a best case scenario as far as data fraud goes. We've got a bunch of outright data fabrication coming to light in the social sciences. It's a certainty that fat fucks aren't getting laid more, so pick your poison on how that result got published.
Not fat fucks, overweight fucks. Fat = obese
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
