What would come from that situation? where being honest about the reality of human selection, judgment, perspective, reality, and a crack team of many philosophers/ scientists/ sociologists were tlaking about the reality of the human judgmental condition.
What if they were able to trip the cherrypicks of people who go to haiti, and save the rainforests and shit.
Well the thing is, humanity is sensational, and so people get different sensations from doing things.
All people are selfish. Being empathetic gives you a buzz no different than chad having sex.
IT's just the more common denominator for the sensationality of looks, money, status, egotistical pursuits especially amongst status thirsty rice whores.
Only whites/ or highly sentimental people (in their sensationality pattern) will go out and save whales/ protect rainforests.
But good people are not a commonality. Most people are hierarchal.
Yes, people do save rainforests and whales. But they get a certain passionate sensationality form that. It's turning a laidback glance away from them knowing that huamnity finds their sensationalities their desire. Goodness is never in a vacuum. Everything is pillared upon something. And even if people are inherently compassionate, they still have their compassion pillared on intrinsic interest, or prioritization.
Everything that gets prioritized leaves something else unprioritized.
Even if there is compassion, the compassionate person's view/ philosophy of what is of priority can leave people in teh dust.
And they think we incels are all just... whining brats complaining about first world problems. Where we, in the west, are given the perfect medium of being destitute for us never to really be helped.
What if they were able to trip the cherrypicks of people who go to haiti, and save the rainforests and shit.
Well the thing is, humanity is sensational, and so people get different sensations from doing things.
All people are selfish. Being empathetic gives you a buzz no different than chad having sex.
IT's just the more common denominator for the sensationality of looks, money, status, egotistical pursuits especially amongst status thirsty rice whores.
Only whites/ or highly sentimental people (in their sensationality pattern) will go out and save whales/ protect rainforests.
But good people are not a commonality. Most people are hierarchal.
Yes, people do save rainforests and whales. But they get a certain passionate sensationality form that. It's turning a laidback glance away from them knowing that huamnity finds their sensationalities their desire. Goodness is never in a vacuum. Everything is pillared upon something. And even if people are inherently compassionate, they still have their compassion pillared on intrinsic interest, or prioritization.
Everything that gets prioritized leaves something else unprioritized.
Even if there is compassion, the compassionate person's view/ philosophy of what is of priority can leave people in teh dust.
And they think we incels are all just... whining brats complaining about first world problems. Where we, in the west, are given the perfect medium of being destitute for us never to really be helped.
