What types of people do you vibe with the most, and which are you get along with the least?

[mrlunatic]

How can a degree confirm that knowledge was acquired?

Genuine question, how else would it not? Ofcourse, I don;t believe people with Masters in Computer Science or an MBA to have more knowledge than the average Joe.

But people who read stuff like history, science are the ones with the most knowledge in this world. Don't tell me that the free thinkers from r/conspiracy have the most knowledge. Lol.

 

[tired as fuck]

1) Autists
2) Socially Anxious People
3) Non-tribalists
4) OG Blue Archive fans
5) Otakus (endangered species)
6) .is members

Everyone else I'd rather not interact with tbh.

 

[I_like_pizza]

How can a degree confirm that knowledge was acquired?

It doesnt prove it its a trend, on average people who get degree have to get knowledge in their field of study like law,economy... so in average they have more knowledge than the average blue worker (not hating on blue worker i love them too)

 

[tired as fuck]

Genuine question, how else would it not? Ofcourse, I don;t believe people with Masters in Computer Science or an MBA to have more knowledge than the average Joe.

But people who read stuff like history, science are the ones with the most knowledge in this world. Don't tell me that the free thinkers from r/conspiracy have the most knowledge. Lol.

I would like to give my own input on these points, if I may.
In my (European) experience, frequenting university and graduating are not signs that one is intelligent, nor that knowledge is acquired. I can really only talk about my field, mathematics, and look at the undergraduate years, so keep that in mind, I'm still a 2nd year undergrad. However, in my year there are maybe 2 people out of 60 that I would say have a passion for mathematics and work towards attaining knowledge (3 if you count me in but I deem internal judgments less valid than external ones, so let's keep it at 2); everyone else is only there for "networking" with their "peers" and are all brainrotted zoomers (I'm a zoomer too, but at least not brainrotted). The two people that I mentioned earlier exhibit the usual markers of autism, though they don't seem dysfunctional, more so they perform social masking and light jestermaxxing to fit in with the crowd.

The difference between those 2 and the others isn't just a faster learning curve, but the ability to find connections between areas of mathematics by themselves, study ahead, be creative in order to resolve problems. Everyone else is just there, memorizing things, not really caring, and 5-7 days after the exam they don't remember much, if anything.

That's also in great part the fault of standardized testing (in my uni most exams have a written and an oral part, with the written part being the usual problem-solving stuff that students can find online and practice for hours upon hours, and the oral being not too different with just the theoretical side of things). It's not really incentivized to do meta-thinking about mathematics, or learn to spot the similarities between objects in different areas etc. I could be much more precise but I don't want to be tedious with jargon.

Either way, once outside, the job market does not require you to know much theory, and you're mostly going to learn stuff within a business. Any potential knowledge about logic (not even studied in undergrad btw jfl), meta-thinking, etc. is not developed nor, as a consequence, retained. It's mostly a self-referential world, which is great if you're like me and want to join it in order to do what you like, get paid well, and not having to interact with normies, but it's designed to not promote deeper understanding and complexity because, fundamentally, universities gatekeep such abilities for masters/PhD students.

At least that is what I can observe myself.

Also, while I don't debate that stupid people that think they're smart are actually smart, I don't think that, in general, those who read history or science tend to be smarter than others; history is to be interpreted, and science lends itself well to a memorization type of learning.

Tbh I am not even sure what I consider knowledge so there's that I guess, but functionally I will adopt your definition.

 

[tired as fuck]

Types of people I don't like:
- People who are overly positive to the point of being delusional.
- Dramatic/overly emotional people.
- Douchey rich people.
- Poor people who constantly bitch about rich people.
- Stoners who revolve their whole identity around being a stoner.
- Hipsters.
- Dude-bro types.
- People who wont stop beating you over the head with something they like even when you've made it clear it's not your thing.
- Americans and non-Americans who constantly try to one-up each other over inane bullshit.
- People pleasers.

pretty much same

 

[mrlunatic]

I would like to give my own input on these points, if I may.
In my (European) experience, frequenting university and graduating are not signs that one is intelligent, nor that knowledge is acquired. I can really only talk about my field, mathematics, and look at the undergraduate years, so keep that in mind, I'm still a 2nd year undergrad. However, in my year there are maybe 2 people out of 60 that I would say have a passion for mathematics and work towards attaining knowledge (3 if you count me in but I deem internal judgments less valid than external ones, so let's keep it at 2); everyone else is only there for "networking" with their "peers" and are all brainrotted zoomers (I'm a zoomer too, but at least not brainrotted). The two people that I mentioned earlier exhibit the usual markers of autism, though they don't seem dysfunctional, more so they perform social masking and light jestermaxxing to fit in with the crowd.

The difference between those 2 and the others isn't just a faster learning curve, but the ability to find connections between areas of mathematics by themselves, study ahead, be creative in order to resolve problems. Everyone else is just there, memorizing things, not really caring, and 5-7 days after the exam they don't remember much, if anything.

That's also in great part the fault of standardized testing (in my uni most exams have a written and an oral part, with the written part being the usual problem-solving stuff that students can find online and practice for hours upon hours, and the oral being not too different with just the theoretical side of things). It's not really incentivized to do meta-thinking about mathematics, or learn to spot the similarities between objects in different areas etc. I could be much more precise but I don't want to be tedious with jargon.

Either way, once outside, the job market does not require you to know much theory, and you're mostly going to learn stuff within a business. Any potential knowledge about logic (not even studied in undergrad btw jfl), meta-thinking, etc. is not developed nor, as a consequence, retained. It's mostly a self-referential world, which is great if you're like me and want to join it in order to do what you like, get paid well, and not having to interact with normies, but it's designed to not promote deeper understanding and complexity because, fundamentally, universities gatekeep such abilities for masters/PhD students.

At least that is what I can observe myself.

Also, while I don't debate that stupid people that think they're smart are actually smart, I don't think that, in general, those who read history or science tend to be smarter than others; history is to be interpreted, and science lends itself well to a memorization type of learning.

Tbh I am not even sure what I consider knowledge so there's that I guess, but functionally I will adopt your definition.

You're quite right that education can simply not correlate to more knowledge.

But also why I specifically gave you the example of computer science grads and MBAs. I'd say maths grads fall into the same area.

I can definitely see the smartest maths guy being a genius but oblivious to life's biggest mysteries.

But this starts merging for other fields like History and Astronomical or biological science for eg. These fields themselves give you knowledge. Not applicable to everyone again of course.

 

[tired as fuck]

I can definitely see the smartest maths guy being a genius but oblivious to life's biggest mysteries.

why?

what are life's biggest mysteries?

 

[I_like_pizza]

I would like to give my own input on these points, if I may.
In my (European) experience, frequenting university and graduating are not signs that one is intelligent, nor that knowledge is acquired. I can really only talk about my field, mathematics, and look at the undergraduate years, so keep that in mind, I'm still a 2nd year undergrad. However, in my year there are maybe 2 people out of 60 that I would say have a passion for mathematics and work towards attaining knowledge (3 if you count me in but I deem internal judgments less valid than external ones, so let's keep it at 2); everyone else is only there for "networking" with their "peers" and are all brainrotted zoomers (I'm a zoomer too, but at least not brainrotted). The two people that I mentioned earlier exhibit the usual markers of autism, though they don't seem dysfunctional, more so they perform social masking and light jestermaxxing to fit in with the crowd.

The difference between those 2 and the others isn't just a faster learning curve, but the ability to find connections between areas of mathematics by themselves, study ahead, be creative in order to resolve problems. Everyone else is just there, memorizing things, not really caring, and 5-7 days after the exam they don't remember much, if anything.

That's also in great part the fault of standardized testing (in my uni most exams have a written and an oral part, with the written part being the usual problem-solving stuff that students can find online and practice for hours upon hours, and the oral being not too different with just the theoretical side of things). It's not really incentivized to do meta-thinking about mathematics, or learn to spot the similarities between objects in different areas etc. I could be much more precise but I don't want to be tedious with jargon.

Either way, once outside, the job market does not require you to know much theory, and you're mostly going to learn stuff within a business. Any potential knowledge about logic (not even studied in undergrad btw jfl), meta-thinking, etc. is not developed nor, as a consequence, retained. It's mostly a self-referential world, which is great if you're like me and want to join it in order to do what you like, get paid well, and not having to interact with normies, but it's designed to not promote deeper understanding and complexity because, fundamentally, universities gatekeep such abilities for masters/PhD students.

At least that is what I can observe myself.

Also, while I don't debate that stupid people that think they're smart are actually smart, I don't think that, in general, those who read history or science tend to be smarter than others; history is to be interpreted, and science lends itself well to a memorization type of learning.

Tbh I am not even sure what I consider knowledge so there's that I guess, but functionally I will adopt your definition.

not about being smart cause its not a defined term, the subject is "can you be educated and left wing" cathuluelitist say its an oxymoron i say no and that people who received more education as in study like PhD will lean more left wing, and mrlunatic say that if you study history or science you will have more knowledge on average wich is i think true, also i dont think IQ or any form of "intelectual superiority" like being able to be good in math is needed it may help because logic is important but a hight iq bluecollar will not be able to outperform a low iq Social science student in this subject in average at least

 

[mrlunatic]

why?

what are life's biggest mysteries?

I cannot pick one single candidate for this. Would a maths guy understand the plight of different races?

 

[nazianime]

I don’t think I vibe with anyone real, most comfortable I have felt was with quite kids the ones that don’t say a word. I pretty much hate anyone that turns interactions into a one up contest. Which is most chads and neurotypical.

I vibe with inanimate objects like stuffed animals and anime figures.

 

[tired as fuck]

I cannot pick one single candidate for this. Would a maths guy understand the plight of different races?

a math guy would ask "maybe if you clearly state what you are thinking of I could try to give you an answer" P

 

[tired as fuck]

not about being smart cause its not a defined term, the subject is "can you be educated and left wing" cathuluelitist say its an oxymoron i say no and that people who received more education as in study like PhD will lean more left wing, and mrlunatic say that if you study history or science you will have more knowledge on average wich is i think true, also i dont think IQ or any form of "intelectual superiority" like being able to be good in math is needed it may help because logic is important but a hight iq bluecollar will not be able to outperform a low iq Social science student in this subject in average at least

IQ is not intellectual superiority necessarily, it is strictly a metric for pattern recognition.

I think the question is void because you'll always find both educated and uneducated people on both sides and at the centre. Maybe a better question would be "On average, which side has the most competence/knowledge on a series of topic?" And then maybe you conduct a study but then again, the study will be inherently flawed to such an extent that I wouldn't even take it as an actual metric.

So personally I can't answer that with anything but what I said before.

Also in my opinion social sciences are indoctrination centers, both due to the people that work as professors and researchers in such areas, and due to the textbooks and manuals (above all, the DSM-V-TR) and the typical mental configuration that such environments bestow on the students. Is there a correlation between leftists and social science students/researchers/professors? Maybe, maybe not.

 

[I_like_pizza]

IQ is not intellectual superiority necessarily, it is strictly a metric for pattern recognition.

I think the question is void because you'll always find both educated and uneducated people on both sides and at the centre. Maybe a better question would be "On average, which side has the most competence/knowledge on a series of topic?" And then maybe you conduct a study but then again, the study will be inherently flawed to such an extent that I wouldn't even take it as an actual metric.

So personally I can't answer that with anything but what I said before.

Also in my opinion social sciences are indoctrination centers, both due to the people that work as professors and researchers in such areas, and due to the textbooks and manuals (above all, the DSM-V-TR) and the typical mental configuration that such environments bestow on the students. Is there a correlation between leftists and social science students/researchers/professors? Maybe, maybe not.

i dont need it to be true in average i just need one person who is at the time left wing and educated to be right

 

[tired as fuck]

i dont need it to be true in average i just need one person who is at the time left wing and educated to be right

GrAY only wants to be right and nothing more I see.

 

[Halfpassedover]

Do you treat me with decency and as an equal? Do you not try to bully and disrespect me just because you can like a bitch? Congratulations! You and I can be good friends. Yeah I'm not that hard to get along with for anybody irl. The problem is that as a man if you have 0 social leverage and aren't physically attractive then you're a walking target for low life faggots desperate for an ego boost.

 

[I_like_pizza]

GrAY only wants to be right and nothing more I see.

yes because you said it yourself this question is shit, people can just define educated differently and never have to actually make a good point

 

[tired as fuck]

yes because you said it yourself this question is shit, people can just define educated differently and never have to actually make a good point

the question was stupid and bro is clearly biased imo.

 

[cathuluelitist]

Genuine question, how else would it not?

You can not learn but still be edulcorated with titles. Look at Vivek.

 

[chihiro]

i dont rly get along with anyone

 

[Sir Silentium]

- follow Chirst
- introverted
- right winged
- not falling for modern propaganda

 

[Freixel]

I clash a lot with low-iq NPCs (normis) and various types of losers

I never had a problem or confrontation with good looking people jfl

Its always other incel-tier people that have problems with me, even irl

Its a pattern that i have noticed in my life

I think i go along with free thinkers

 

[Rapistcel]

People I vibe with the most:

1) Lower class
2) Less educated, never went to college
3) Late gen X or 80s born millennials
4) NT
5) Apolitical or not (conventionally) right wing or left wing
6) Open minded, free thinker
7) Not happy with the state of society
8) Extroverted
9) Self-aware
10) Humble
11) Direct and more masculine communication, but not obnoxious.
12) Not terminally online (endangered species)
13) Simple interests, simple hobbies
14) Realist, down-to-earth.
15) Blue collar worker
16) Sub5 blackpillers with a lot of real world experience that also don't fall for any of the red herrings or pseudoscience shit (Rare to the point where they're almost impossible to find in the real world, and are becoming increasingly hard to find even in blackpill spaces.)

People I'm more likely to clash with:

1) Passive-aggressive
2) Smug
3) ND, especially the ones with neurotic/obsessive or schizo tendencies
4) Dunning-kruger
5) Has a degree. Especially if they're the academic types, grad student, or have a postgraduate degree.
6) Upper middle class or wealthy
7) Very political and clearly belongs to a "right wing" or "left wing" tribe
8) Terminally online, especially tiktok or redditor
9) NPC
10) Pathological contrarian (IE inverted NPC)
11) "Nerdy" types
12) Anti-AI
13) Likes to talk down to people and lecture them
14) Redpillers
15) Bluepillers
16) Midwits
17) Literal boomers and zoomers
18) Hyper-competitive
19) Irony-bros
20) Performative
21) Broscience types and people who otherwise fall for schizo-tier quackery.


All that being said, none of these are hard and fast rules for me. I've had friends who checked more of the boxes in the second category than the first. But in general this is the pattern. Gender not mentioned because while the people I've vibed with the most have been male, the people I've clashed with the most have also mostly been male.

You could also oversimplify this list by just saying "redditors (clash with) and anti-redditors (vibe with)" and you'd be like 90 percent correct.

People I tend to like (would be friend):
Not too much social.
Shares interests with me.
Bad educative level.
Humble.
Doesn't talk down to me.
Realistic.
Brutally honest.
FC Barcelona fan.
Comes early.
Tends to question official version.
Doesn't have sexual/romantic success (or at least don't talk about that in front of me)
Serious, isn't constantly trying to sound fun.
Prefers deep and long conversations over small talk.
Says what he believes and isn't an hypocritical.


I will tell what kind of people I dislike the most (would never be friend):
Excessively optimistic people.
Condescending people.
Sexually successful people, ( specially if they brag about it).
Liars.
Extroverts.
Man who has foid attitudes.
People who aren't direct and use too much euphemisms at talking.
People who always come late
"funny guys" who make fun of you while supposedly being your friends.
Traitors.
People who care too much about cleanship, hygiene, etc.
People who are friends of everyone.
People who trust official version/majority opinion too much.
People who support feminism or LGBT ideology(otherwise I don't really discriminate you because of your ideology).
Cool wannabes.
Jesters.
Naive people.
People who talk behind your back.
People whose "humour" is mocking your looks or any circunstance you can't controll.
Simp, constantly tries to impress foids even if they reject him.
Bienqueda/hypocritical, lies about himself to be in a better position.
Brags about being "successful in life" (dating, money, etc).
"muh you need to change and improve bro"

 

[proudweeb]

I really only interact with people on this forum and at work

I prolly get along best with autists with obscure interests (at least online)

irl I hate being around people who are too loud and overly outgoing and talk way too much

or people who generally like a lot of chaos. that shit stresses me tf out

 

[Rapistcel]

irl I hate being around people who are too loud and overly outgoing and talk way too much

Same

 

[FoidsEnshittifyAll]

with none. a truecel shouldnt have friends but be pariah of society. fakecel trait if not.
bro should have been born as a hay stacker in a texan farm in the 70s to find his audience.

 

[FoidsEnshittifyAll]

I vibe with foid prostitutes. They suck my dick and I fuck them.

 

[fastnbulbous]

I vibe the most with older zoomercels, losers like me and nerds pretty much.

The ones that i get along with the worst are all the pretentious types who think they are above you because they are a certain race or have a certain reputation. I hate them. I also can't relate to very young people, the generational gap is just too big and the way they talk is obnoxious.

 

[SociallyStunted]

I can get along with most people its just seems like most people cant get along with me (as it seems)

I guess the only people i dont really get along with are
-richfags
-faggots, troons, furries
-people who make politics/philosophy their entire personality
- non incels/blackpillers
- kids that are below 16
- people that have or had many friends in the past
- Gen x’ers and before
- overly dramatic/aggresive
- bullies people and tries to pass it off as a “joke”
- NT
-“mentalcels”

 

[Ricecel Sungnodius]

I vibe with:

Fucking no one.

 

[Chud Norris72]

Government and corporation dick suckers

I hate those especially

 

[Grodd]

I'm not sure as i have no friends

 

[DjentlemanDuke]

people im likely to vibe with most
1: religious peple who keep it to themselves (irl some of the most descent folk i've met are muslims, christians, hindus, even some pagans who actually follow their faith. i dont care if its because they think they'll go to hell for it. as long as their not too preachy they generally the least sociopathic groups i've met)
2. those with passions (i never developed a personal passion that i cared a lot about. so those who have artists, muscians, some geninunue intellectuals always get a vote of )
3: introverts in terms of leaving other people alone (if you dont interact or belittle me and leave me alone to be a weirdo. ill like you passively)
people im not likely to vibe with
1: hyper political types (if they cant go 2 seconds without mentioning current thing ill probably dislike them.)
2: nihilists (not that i dont agree but they never shut the fuck. yes i've read nietzche god is dead)
3: edge lords (usually attention whores)
4: women (any kind)
5: nerds (usually just coomsumers in denial)
6: sports fucks
7: troons/alt-righters (horse shoe theory is real)

 

[Mr.Breb]

people i vibe with:

1)my brothers
2) Social outcasted people
3) truly introvert people (considering introvert at least having 0 irl friends)


people i hate
1)in general sexhavers, the most narcisistic theyŕe the most i hate them
2)impulsive people

 

[Cosmicsdorito]

are you black?

 

[Cosmicsdorito]

I don't like people with excessive pride, ND schizos, and circle jerkers

 

[Junkosbiggestdicker]

intelligent NDs, any NT or any sub- at least 115IQ is either boring or annoying, if not both

 

[Yabadadabadoo]

Best:
Low inhib retarda
Aspies
Good people

Worse:
Stacies
Chads
Extremely shy people

 

[TooSomething]

I vibe most with:
Down to earth people
Smart people - who arent arrogant

I dont vibe well with:
Stoners
Aggressive people
Obnixous people

I smoke some weed in the evening, sometimes.
But tbh, I have only started because I needed to stop thinking toouch after being bullied out of my last job.

Now I am basically just taking a small him every other day in the evening until I run out of the last crumbs that I have to never buy it again.

I simply needed it to give my mind a bit of a break from the bullshit that I've experienced.

Before that I haven't touched weed since 16/17.

I was never a stoner though. Just occasionally back then.

Or does that still make me a stoner?

Shame if it does.

 

[TooSomething]

I like real people, who are humble and question even their strongest convictions regularely, as in free thinkers.
I like when people are honest, even if it hurts. What I don't like are literal sellouts who have no real moral code but just pretend to have one and even throw their own friends under the bus for pussy and or money.

Happened to me recently, btw. Another friendship down the drain, man.

Currently completely alone.

 

[Aventador]

I smoke some weed in the evening, sometimes.
But tbh, I have only started because I needed to stop thinking toouch after being bullied out of my last job.

Now I am basically just taking a small him every other day in the evening until I run out of the last crumbs that I have to never buy it again.

I simply needed it to give my mind a bit of a break from the bullshit that I've experienced.

Before that I haven't touched weed since 16/17.

I was never a stoner though. Just occasionally back then.

Or does that still make me a stoner?

Shame if it does.

No no, stoners as in they make weed and drugs their whole personality. I have friends who smoked weed, nothing strange bro.

I like real people, who are humble and question even their strongest convictions regularely, as in free thinkers.
I like when people are honest, even if it hurts. What I don't like are literal sellouts who have no real moral code but just pretend to have one and even throw their own friends under the bus for pussy and or money.

Happened to me recently, btw. Another friendship down the drain, man.

Currently completely alone.

Agreed. Also what happened?

 

[TooSomething]

No no, stoners as in they make weed and drugs their whole personality. I have friends who smoked weed, nothing strange bro.


Agreed. Also what happened?

A now former friend of mine sold out to my former employer basically.
While I was still employed there he'd boast about how he'd leave this shitty company soon for good and how he can find bette, yada yada yada.
He also complained a lot about the three bullies but he never made any of his empty threats true.

I eventually told him that none of the people there even tale him seriousely anymore since he has been promising to leave for over a year now and he has instead decided to suck the new boss's dick as well as cozy up with the bullies even.
When I confronted him about how he is now all of a sudden singing to the tune of these pieces of shit like a good little boy he almost snapped on me and got aggressive and told me that I was bringing bad vibes to his home and how I have super low confidence and am a very small boy, very insecure.

I did not even ever scream at him or anything. I always remained calm and collected because I actually see this things clearly.

Then I left his place only to return shortly after because I forgot my backpack there.

While taking it he asked me in a very condescending tone "What now? Are you sulking now because of this?" .

I did not recognize this faggot anymore. I remember how I've supported him so he could get his driver's licence back but he never really wanted my help and wasted a whole year.
After I'd left he's started sucking the boss's dick because he wanted him to help him get his driver's licence back and possibly get a loan for a car.

If he actually does this he will be the bosses bitch for a LONG time.
With me, he would not be in such a dilemma. I would have never taken advantage of his weakness, but this corporate asshole absolutely will.

He sold out.

Also, him and I did not get the covid vaxx and survived the craze together.
Since he is a sexhaver I warned him to not get intimate with vaxxed foids because you never know what effects it could have on an unvaxxed person.

Back then he was super vigilant about this.
But ever since a hot vaxxed foid showed interest in him he scrapped all of his convictions, all of his boundaries and fucked the bitch raw on the first date.

You can think what you want about anti-vaxxers, but this dude has no spine and I wonder how he can stand upright.

Absolute sellout.

 

[Aventador]

A now former friend of mine sold out to my former employer basically.
While I was still employed there he'd boast about how he'd leave this shitty company soon for good and how he can find bette, yada yada yada.
He also complained a lot about the three bullies but he never made any of his empty threats true.

I eventually told him that none of the people there even tale him seriousely anymore since he has been promising to leave for over a year now and he has instead decided to suck the new boss's dick as well as cozy up with the bullies even.
When I confronted him about how he is now all of a sudden singing to the tune of these pieces of shit like a good little boy he almost snapped on me and got aggressive and told me that I was bringing bad vibes to his home and how I have super low confidence and am a very small boy, very insecure.

I did not even ever scream at him or anything. I always remained calm and collected because I actually see this things clearly.

Then I left his place only to return shortly after because I forgot my backpack there.

While taking it he asked me in a very condescending tone "What now? Are you sulking now because of this?" .

I did not recognize this faggot anymore. I remember how I've supported him so he could get his driver's licence back but he never really wanted my help and wasted a whole year.
After I'd left he's started sucking the boss's dick because he wanted him to help him get his driver's licence back and possibly get a loan for a car.

If he actually does this he will be the bosses bitch for a LONG time.
With me, he would not be in such a dilemma. I would have never taken advantage of his weakness, but this corporate asshole absolutely will.

He sold out.

Also, him and I did not get the covid vaxx and survived the craze together.
Since he is a sexhaver I warned him to not get intimate with vaxxed foids because you never know what effects it could have on an unvaxxed person.

Back then he was super vigilant about this.
But ever since a hot vaxxed foid showed interest in him he scrapped all of his convictions, all of his boundaries and fucked the bitch raw on the first date.

You can think what you want about anti-vaxxers, but this dude has no spine and I wonder how he can stand upright.

Absolute sellout.

Fuck me. At least he showed you his true colors so you could avoid him. Stay safe bro.

I got the vaxx unfortunately, never going to repeat this mistake again.

 

[TooSomething]

Fuck me. At least he showed you his true colors so you could avoid him. Stay safe bro.

I got the vaxx unfortunately, never going to repeat this mistake again.

Man, I wish you would have told me that you too avoided the vaxx.

I have read that all the manifacturers could not keep up with demand so they had to resort to producing a lot of placebos also.

So, you might be lucky. I don't know.

But I do know how to identify the vaxxed without even knowing or asking them.

Believe it or not, they are sporting their own bluetooth signal.

I have no idea what the purpose of this is, but they all have their own bluetooth signal.

Another user he has shared a lot more information on that but that was a long time ago and I don't remember his name.

You can see all those unidentified bluetooth signals yourself with older smartphones and woth newer smartphones when you switch to developer mode or administrator mode or whatever.

My current phone does not show them either way, but my Motorola E22 does show them.

Especially in vaccination centers there are dozens of such signals and none is identified by the phone as for example a printer, headphone, tv etc. .

They just show the bluetooth symbol and the MAC address.

Something very sinister is going on.

 

[TooSomething]

Fuck me. At least he showed you his true colors so you could avoid him. Stay safe bro.

I got the vaxx unfortunately, never going to repeat this mistake again.

What is interesting is that certain conspiracy theories are claiming that the Jews got just empty placebos to not harm them.

As if. I remember seeing many hasidic or so Jews trying to be exempt from the vaxx due to religious reason.
So even they had to fight against it.

Then again, we'd have to check the mortality rate after that vaxx canpaign.

Before the vaxx turbo cancer wasn't even a term.

 

[VλREN]

There's not a single demographic that I have a predominantly positive interactions with

 

[Aventador]

Man, I wish you would have told me that you too avoided the vaxx.

I have read that all the manifacturers could not keep up with demand so they had to resort to producing a lot of placebos also.

So, you might be lucky. I don't know.

But I do know how to identify the vaxxed without even knowing or asking them.

Believe it or not, they are sporting their own bluetooth signal.

I have no idea what the purpose of this is, but they all have their own bluetooth signal.

Another user he has shared a lot more information on that but that was a long time ago and I don't remember his name.

You can see all those unidentified bluetooth signals yourself with older smartphones and woth newer smartphones when you switch to developer mode or administrator mode or whatever.

My current phone does not show them either way, but my Motorola E22 does show them.

Especially in vaccination centers there are dozens of such signals and none is identified by the phone as for example a printer, headphone, tv etc. .

They just show the bluetooth symbol and the MAC address.

Something very sinister is going on.

Interesting.
I got severe symptoms from the vaccine, they ruined my health. I recovered but still wasnt like before.

About bluetooth signals, I don't think a microchip is possible without a battery, otherwise there is no power source.

Unless you are using cellular level energy - think atp, and convert it to electricity, i dont see it happen.

It was just an exercise in control, and unfortunately i trust the government at the time.

 

[TooSomething]

Interesting.
I got severe symptoms from the vaccine, they ruined my health. I recovered but still wasnt like before.

About bluetooth signals, I don't think a microchip is possible without a battery, otherwise there is no power source.

Unless you are using cellular level energy - think atp, and convert it to electricity, i dont see it happen.

It was just an exercise in control, and unfortunately i trust the government at the time.

Believe it or not, these chips apparently run on just electromagnetic radiation.

I have done a test with two vaxxed co-workers once who had bluetooth signals as well.

We kept moving away from our workshop, further and further out on the field and at first their signals were there and only these two but then, eventually they disappeared.

We then started slowly moving back and all of a sudden they reappeared. The exact same signal, the same MAC addresses and only those two.

Electromagnetic radiation is enough to power these small chips.
I wish I was making this up.

I am sorry this happened to you. But I will be honest with you. So far, everyone who's had complications after getting the vaxx and survived those eventually developed worse once or even died.

Some died very fast because they developed turbo cancer.

My mother lost A LOT OF customers to turbo cancer.
After the vaxxination campaign our old people homes were emptied almost over night.

Some people jokingly said that the vaxx was the solution to the aging population.

 

[cirno369]

I hate racist people

 

[Aventador]

Believe it or not, these chips apparently run on just electromagnetic radiation.

I have done a test with two vaxxed co-workers once who had bluetooth signals as well.

We kept moving away from our workshop, further and further out on the field and at first their signals were there and only these two but then, eventually they disappeared.

We then started slowly moving back and all of a sudden they reappeared. The exact same signal, the same MAC addresses and only those two.

Electromagnetic radiation is enough to power these small chips.
I wish I was making this up.

I am sorry this happened to you. But I will be honest with you. So far, everyone who's had complications after getting the vaxx and survived those eventually developed worse once or even died.

Some died very fast because they developed turbo cancer.

My mother lost A LOT OF customers to turbo cancer.
After the vaxxination campaign our old people homes were emptied almost over night.

Some people jokingly said that the vaxx was the solution to the aging population.

Well, guess im screwed haha

 

[Aventador]

I hate racist people

Based. I hate everyone equally.