Numerous philosophers have proposed that humans possess an innate social nature, seeking attention and interaction with others. However, an intriguing aspect arises when considering thinkers like Karl Marx, who argued that those who don't work shouldn't receive sustenance, while also addressing the issue of alienation experienced by certain individuals. This prompts questions about exceptional individuals who prefer solitude, engaging in activities like crafting, gaming, or reading, finding it challenging to be around others. This inclination is more commonly observed among men, who tend to exhibit individualistic tendencies rather than a strong inclination towards group dynamics, which is more characteristic of women. Sociologists and psychologists have often associated "crowd mentality" with femininity, perceiving women as conforming to societal norms and following instructions.
Even Adolf Hitler suggested that winning the hearts of women would lead men to follow suit, as men are more prone to questioning narratives compared to women. This disparity may explain why many conspiracy theorists and philosophers are predominantly male. Men's inclination to delve deeply into matters, coupled with women's tendency to form judgments based on initial impressions, can result in many men remaining perpetually single. Women possess a sixth sense known as "intuition," allowing them to swiftly assess a man's value within minutes of conversation.
This contrast raises questions about NEETs (Not in Education, Employment, or Training). Why should these men be compelled to step outside their comfort zones to fulfill basic needs like food, housing, or transportation? Instead of imposing such requirements, it would be more appropriate to establish a basic minimum income for all individuals, regardless of employment status, while also expanding social safety nets for the working class. The increasing reliance on technology presents both advantages and challenges for NEETs. On one hand, technology allows them to avoid face-to-face interactions and the biases associated with their circumstances. On the other hand, it can lead to their detachment from society. A society predominantly composed of introverts would struggle to function, as trust between individuals diminishes, potentially undermining the cohesiveness of the community.
Reducing excessive dependence on technology would incentivize the integration of those marginalized by technological progress and encourage them to give society a chance. However, it is important to note that coercive measures are not favorable. People generally resist control unless they have a particular affinity for power dynamics. In times of collapse, we may find ourselves heavily reliant on one another. Additionally, it is worth considering that women often contribute to the mistreatment of less fortunate men, as they hold expectations that not all men can meet. NEETs would benefit from more male friendships and a sense of belonging. The world needs more men supporting one another and providing emotional support, as women's in-group preferences often hinder them from fully fulfilling that role. Women tend to avoid questioning the status quo or societal assumptions about men, and changing this would require substantial efforts. Furthermore, it is worth acknowledging that women have been known to betray their own men in times of defeat, a phenomenon referred to as "war bride syndrome." In extreme cases, it may be necessary to depersonalize women (legally, not literally) to prevent interference with the dialectical mode of history, whether material or otherwise.
Political quizzes often pose the question of prioritizing personal safety over freedom, and during times of crisis, prioritizing safety seems more prudent. Once the crisis has passed, society can focus on improving workers' rights, ensuring they receive fair compensation for their labor, implementing land taxes for development, and ultimately reestablishing the market. Given that women are more inclined to be consumers and are often the target audience of advertisements, it is crucial to recognize that "women are human beings, men are human doings," as Warren Farrell famously stated. Let us consider that some men have no stake in doing anything for women or society at large. A basic income can provide them with the means to afford certain comforts without the pressure to conform to societal expectations, motivating them to integrate into the community and establish their own homes. It remains to be seen if this income can be limited to necessities like food, shelter, and transportation to facilitate quicker integration. They would not need to climb the social ladder to impress others, their employers, their partners (if they have one), or society as a whole. Coexistence without active participation addresses the inherent socialist problem of "work or starve" for those unable to work or socialize. This aspect warrants consideration, taking into account its psychological and social implications for the state as a whole.
Even Adolf Hitler suggested that winning the hearts of women would lead men to follow suit, as men are more prone to questioning narratives compared to women. This disparity may explain why many conspiracy theorists and philosophers are predominantly male. Men's inclination to delve deeply into matters, coupled with women's tendency to form judgments based on initial impressions, can result in many men remaining perpetually single. Women possess a sixth sense known as "intuition," allowing them to swiftly assess a man's value within minutes of conversation.
This contrast raises questions about NEETs (Not in Education, Employment, or Training). Why should these men be compelled to step outside their comfort zones to fulfill basic needs like food, housing, or transportation? Instead of imposing such requirements, it would be more appropriate to establish a basic minimum income for all individuals, regardless of employment status, while also expanding social safety nets for the working class. The increasing reliance on technology presents both advantages and challenges for NEETs. On one hand, technology allows them to avoid face-to-face interactions and the biases associated with their circumstances. On the other hand, it can lead to their detachment from society. A society predominantly composed of introverts would struggle to function, as trust between individuals diminishes, potentially undermining the cohesiveness of the community.
Reducing excessive dependence on technology would incentivize the integration of those marginalized by technological progress and encourage them to give society a chance. However, it is important to note that coercive measures are not favorable. People generally resist control unless they have a particular affinity for power dynamics. In times of collapse, we may find ourselves heavily reliant on one another. Additionally, it is worth considering that women often contribute to the mistreatment of less fortunate men, as they hold expectations that not all men can meet. NEETs would benefit from more male friendships and a sense of belonging. The world needs more men supporting one another and providing emotional support, as women's in-group preferences often hinder them from fully fulfilling that role. Women tend to avoid questioning the status quo or societal assumptions about men, and changing this would require substantial efforts. Furthermore, it is worth acknowledging that women have been known to betray their own men in times of defeat, a phenomenon referred to as "war bride syndrome." In extreme cases, it may be necessary to depersonalize women (legally, not literally) to prevent interference with the dialectical mode of history, whether material or otherwise.
Political quizzes often pose the question of prioritizing personal safety over freedom, and during times of crisis, prioritizing safety seems more prudent. Once the crisis has passed, society can focus on improving workers' rights, ensuring they receive fair compensation for their labor, implementing land taxes for development, and ultimately reestablishing the market. Given that women are more inclined to be consumers and are often the target audience of advertisements, it is crucial to recognize that "women are human beings, men are human doings," as Warren Farrell famously stated. Let us consider that some men have no stake in doing anything for women or society at large. A basic income can provide them with the means to afford certain comforts without the pressure to conform to societal expectations, motivating them to integrate into the community and establish their own homes. It remains to be seen if this income can be limited to necessities like food, shelter, and transportation to facilitate quicker integration. They would not need to climb the social ladder to impress others, their employers, their partners (if they have one), or society as a whole. Coexistence without active participation addresses the inherent socialist problem of "work or starve" for those unable to work or socialize. This aspect warrants consideration, taking into account its psychological and social implications for the state as a whole.
