One of the common arguments against divorce is that it takes wealth away from men. This never convinced me. I've said it before, but if a man has accumulated wealth before, he can do it again. I also feel this argument is weak because reproduction is worth a lot. Even if you lose a lot, you gained even more from marriage even if it ends. And for this reason, some MRAs say it's better not to get married, which is vile.
And that brings me to another point - why does the child custody issue matter? These MRAs never advocate against policing even though incarceration separates fathers and sometimes even mothers from their children, so I'm not going to support the men's rights movement.
Then there's the suicide argument; however, if conservatives really cared about suicide(or euthanasia as they say) why don't they try to raise the birth rate? We know the childless are more likely to commit suicide according to Emile Durkheim.
I know this might be sound blue pilled, but I feel like MRAs aren't just anti-feminist - they're anti-female.
Anywho, the whole point of this thread was that I wanted to say that an argument against divorce can be domestic violence. I realized this as I was reading Imperfect Victims:
However, after writing this thread I do feel like domestic violence is actually bad, though I'm not entirely sure if the author would agree, but I don't think it should be punished with incarceration. It does seem like the author thinks domestic violence should be decriminalized:
It seems she came around to abolition now. Of course I just started this book, so it seems to be too soon to endorse it.
I'm against domestic violence because I think a wife depriving her husband of sex is a form of domestic violence. It's a form of violence because like violence, it makes men feel bad. That's why I support the legalization of marital rape, which is one way of tackling domestic violence.
And that brings me to another point - why does the child custody issue matter? These MRAs never advocate against policing even though incarceration separates fathers and sometimes even mothers from their children, so I'm not going to support the men's rights movement.
Then there's the suicide argument; however, if conservatives really cared about suicide(or euthanasia as they say) why don't they try to raise the birth rate? We know the childless are more likely to commit suicide according to Emile Durkheim.
I know this might be sound blue pilled, but I feel like MRAs aren't just anti-feminist - they're anti-female.
Anywho, the whole point of this thread was that I wanted to say that an argument against divorce can be domestic violence. I realized this as I was reading Imperfect Victims:
However, after writing this thread I do feel like domestic violence is actually bad, though I'm not entirely sure if the author would agree, but I don't think it should be punished with incarceration. It does seem like the author thinks domestic violence should be decriminalized:
It seems she came around to abolition now. Of course I just started this book, so it seems to be too soon to endorse it.
I'm against domestic violence because I think a wife depriving her husband of sex is a form of domestic violence. It's a form of violence because like violence, it makes men feel bad. That's why I support the legalization of marital rape, which is one way of tackling domestic violence.
