and therefore she is gulty of abuse ? What are the counter-arguments or flaws in this reasoning?
what is wrong with the argument that women chose the abusive husbands herself
The abuser was 6'5. So the foid personality detector automatically fails
F
Are you asking whether a woman in an abusive relationship is at fault for the abuse she suffers because she chose that partner in the first place? (Please Englishmax.) If so, I'll respond under that presumption.
The problem with that line of reasoning is that it collapses all nuance into a single decision point and pretends that everything that follows was somehow foreseeable. People do not enter relationships expecting to be abused. Abusers do not advertise themselves as such. They are often charismatic, attentive, and persuasive in the early stages. The abuse comes later, often gradually, and often after the victim is emotionally invested or isolated.
That said, not every victim is without fault. Some people ignore red flags, or stay because they value status, looks, or comfort over safety. Some even return to the same kind of partner again and again. But even then, what you are dealing with is poor judgment or self-destructive tendencies, not guilt for someone else's violence. Choosing poorly is not the same as deserving mistreatment. It is one thing to be unwise, another to be culpable for what someone else chooses to do with power over you.
So no, women are not automatically absolved of all judgment. But for the most part, they are not to blame for being abused.
The problem with that line of reasoning is that it collapses all nuance into a single decision point and pretends that everything that follows was somehow foreseeable. People do not enter relationships expecting to be abused. Abusers do not advertise themselves as such. They are often charismatic, attentive, and persuasive in the early stages. The abuse comes later, often gradually, and often after the victim is emotionally invested or isolated.
That said, not every victim is without fault. Some people ignore red flags, or stay because they value status, looks, or comfort over safety. Some even return to the same kind of partner again and again. But even then, what you are dealing with is poor judgment or self-destructive tendencies, not guilt for someone else's violence. Choosing poorly is not the same as deserving mistreatment. It is one thing to be unwise, another to be culpable for what someone else chooses to do with power over you.
So no, women are not automatically absolved of all judgment. But for the most part, they are not to blame for being abused.
He also has an 8 inch penis.
Notice how a white vest is called a wife beater and not a woman beater.
Foids would do anything for chad.
Foids would do anything for chad.
women’s brains are scientifically proven to be smaller, they’re very dependant creatures and can’t make rational decisions for themselves
There's a reason why you get tagged every time the dickpill is mentioned.
You only need to look at scelerophilia and hybristophilia to see that the majority of them are foreseeable, foids are evil, it can only be with other evils.
good at English just lazy. Thanks.
Similar threads
Discussion
Argument from personal incredulity
- MonkeyInaT34
- Inceldom Discussion
MonkeyInaT34
Max Doltman
Users who are viewing this thread
