chudur-budur
5'2" ugliest currycel, freak of nature.
-
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
- Posts
- 15,542
- Online
- 65d 16h 39m
Secular normgroids use the "consent" argument to condone and legalize faggotry. As a recap, the consent argument goes like this:
"If two consenting adults (generally defined by their age and their mental state) are agreed to engage in certain act that does not cause harm to themselves and anyone else, they should be allowed to do whatever they want".
Faggotry: If two men are consenting adults, and if they want to engage in sexual act, and if the sexual act does not cause any harm to themselves or anyone else, they should be allowed to engage in sexual act.
Shit-fetish: If two persons are consenting adults, and if they want to engage in a sexual act that involves their feces, and if the act does not cause any harm to themselves or anyone else, they should be allowed to engage in that particular act.
Those two are completely legal, now what about this?
Incest: If mother and her son are consenting adults, and if they want to engage in sexual act, and if they are not going to procreate, and if the sexual act does not cause any harm to themselves or anyone else, they should be allowed to engage in sexual act.
Whenever you ask this to any normgroid, they will come up with a new goal post, it's called "Abuse by the position of power". They unironically assume there are "abuse" involved in all forms of incest. Generally parents are abusing/grooming the child etc.
"Abuse" can be present in any relationship, not just between parents and their children. A straight relationship can be abusive, a homosexual relationship can be abusive. A relationship can be abusive even if there is no "sex" involved. A friendship can be abusive, a teacher can abuse a student, a student can abuse a teacher, a boss can abuse the employee and the list goes so on.
But none of those relationships is outlawed.
Normgroids need to be consistent with their bull-shit tbh. If you want to go with your post-modernist secular argument, you need allow all forms of degenerate behaviors, from incest to faggotry to dog-fucking to shit-eating even to corpse-fucking.
Morality can't be defined by logic, that's the exact point where secular argument fails. Law needs to be adapted from religious scriptures only. If scripture says something is bad, that's bad. A law is a law.
"If two consenting adults (generally defined by their age and their mental state) are agreed to engage in certain act that does not cause harm to themselves and anyone else, they should be allowed to do whatever they want".
Faggotry: If two men are consenting adults, and if they want to engage in sexual act, and if the sexual act does not cause any harm to themselves or anyone else, they should be allowed to engage in sexual act.
Shit-fetish: If two persons are consenting adults, and if they want to engage in a sexual act that involves their feces, and if the act does not cause any harm to themselves or anyone else, they should be allowed to engage in that particular act.
Those two are completely legal, now what about this?
Incest: If mother and her son are consenting adults, and if they want to engage in sexual act, and if they are not going to procreate, and if the sexual act does not cause any harm to themselves or anyone else, they should be allowed to engage in sexual act.
Whenever you ask this to any normgroid, they will come up with a new goal post, it's called "Abuse by the position of power". They unironically assume there are "abuse" involved in all forms of incest. Generally parents are abusing/grooming the child etc.
"Abuse" can be present in any relationship, not just between parents and their children. A straight relationship can be abusive, a homosexual relationship can be abusive. A relationship can be abusive even if there is no "sex" involved. A friendship can be abusive, a teacher can abuse a student, a student can abuse a teacher, a boss can abuse the employee and the list goes so on.
But none of those relationships is outlawed.
Normgroids need to be consistent with their bull-shit tbh. If you want to go with your post-modernist secular argument, you need allow all forms of degenerate behaviors, from incest to faggotry to dog-fucking to shit-eating even to corpse-fucking.
Morality can't be defined by logic, that's the exact point where secular argument fails. Law needs to be adapted from religious scriptures only. If scripture says something is bad, that's bad. A law is a law.
